This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/11/trump-census-citizenship-question-supreme-court
The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Trump abandons effort to put citizenship question on 2020 census | |
| (about 3 hours later) | |
| Faced with a defeat in court and few viable options, Donald Trump on Thursday backed off his effort to place a question about citizenship on the next US census while announcing executive action by his administration to collect information on its own. | |
| Speaking from the White House Rose Garden, the president said he will order federal agencies to turn over records on the number of citizens, non-citizens and undocumented immigrants living in the US. | |
| “The only people that are not proud to be citizens are the ones who are fighting us all the way about the word ‘citizen’,” Trump said. | |
| House panel votes to subpoena key Trump officials including Kushner – live | House panel votes to subpoena key Trump officials including Kushner – live |
| The president’s statement came after he teased a news conference on the census and citizenship in a Thursday morning tweet, sparking numerous reports that Trump would unilaterally take executive action to include the citizenship question on 2020 census forms even after his administration was blocked by the supreme court. | |
| But Trump’s controversial plan never saw the light of day – within hours of putting the public on notice, administration officials said the president would defer to the court rulings on the census and instead instruct the commerce department to obtain citizenship data “through other means”. | |
| Standing at the White House podium on a rainy Thursday evening in Washington, Trump began his remarks by letting out a sigh and posing the question he wished to ask of the nation’s population: “Are you a citizen of the United States of America?” | |
| Casting blame on the “radical left”, Trump accused Democrats of turning a blind eye to illegal immigration and cast the fight as one over the very meaning of citizenship. | |
| “This is part of a broader leftwing effort to erode the rights of the American citizen and it is very unfair to our country,” Trump said. | |
| In hedging his actions on the matter, Trump could avoid triggering a legal shockwave, by directly defying a federal court order explicitly enjoining the commerce department from adding the question “without curing the legal defects” of its argument in favor of adding the question on the once-a-decade population count. | In hedging his actions on the matter, Trump could avoid triggering a legal shockwave, by directly defying a federal court order explicitly enjoining the commerce department from adding the question “without curing the legal defects” of its argument in favor of adding the question on the once-a-decade population count. |
| Legal advocates promised an immediate challenge to any attempted executive action on the matter by Trump. “This will not go unanswered,” tweeted Dale Ho, director of the voting rights project at the American Civil Liberties Union. | Legal advocates promised an immediate challenge to any attempted executive action on the matter by Trump. “This will not go unanswered,” tweeted Dale Ho, director of the voting rights project at the American Civil Liberties Union. |
| In a ruling last month, the supreme court upheld the lower court decision against Trump, saying that the commerce department’s stated rationale for including the question – to protect voting rights – “seems to have been contrived” and was a “distraction”. | In a ruling last month, the supreme court upheld the lower court decision against Trump, saying that the commerce department’s stated rationale for including the question – to protect voting rights – “seems to have been contrived” and was a “distraction”. |
| Trump acknowledged the truth of that assessment last week, when he told reporters at the White House that the proposed citizenship question was part of a longterm Republican blueprint to use the congressional redistricting process to tilt power in their favor. “Number one, you need it for Congress – you need it for Congress for districting,” Trump said. “You need it for appropriations – where are the funds going?” | Trump acknowledged the truth of that assessment last week, when he told reporters at the White House that the proposed citizenship question was part of a longterm Republican blueprint to use the congressional redistricting process to tilt power in their favor. “Number one, you need it for Congress – you need it for Congress for districting,” Trump said. “You need it for appropriations – where are the funds going?” |
| Legal analysts warned that any attempt by Trump now to alter the census could open administration lawyers to charges of lying before the supreme court, because in an effort to accelerate the case they told the court five times that the census had to be finalized by 30 June – nearly two weeks ago. | Legal analysts warned that any attempt by Trump now to alter the census could open administration lawyers to charges of lying before the supreme court, because in an effort to accelerate the case they told the court five times that the census had to be finalized by 30 June – nearly two weeks ago. |
| “Separate from whether the president has the power to take this step,” tweeted the University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck, “the Solicitor General repeatedly represented to #SCOTUS that the #2020Census had to be finalized by 6/30. Any move to add the question at this point suggests those representations were false.” | “Separate from whether the president has the power to take this step,” tweeted the University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck, “the Solicitor General repeatedly represented to #SCOTUS that the #2020Census had to be finalized by 6/30. Any move to add the question at this point suggests those representations were false.” |
| Following the supreme court ruling in June, the matter appeared to be settled – until a Trump tweet. | Following the supreme court ruling in June, the matter appeared to be settled – until a Trump tweet. |
| Justice department lawyers affirmed to federal judges that the decision had been taken to print the census without the question, and the commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, announced on 3 July that “the Census Bureau has started the process of printing the decennial questionnaires without the question”. | Justice department lawyers affirmed to federal judges that the decision had been taken to print the census without the question, and the commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, announced on 3 July that “the Census Bureau has started the process of printing the decennial questionnaires without the question”. |
| Then it came crashing down in 280 characters. | Then it came crashing down in 280 characters. |
| “The News Reports about the Department of Commerce dropping its quest to put the Citizenship Question on the Census is incorrect or, to state it differently, FAKE!” Trump tweeted. “We are absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question.” | “The News Reports about the Department of Commerce dropping its quest to put the Citizenship Question on the Census is incorrect or, to state it differently, FAKE!” Trump tweeted. “We are absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question.” |
| One Trump adviser, former federal judge Michael Luttig, argued that executive action by Trump would not precipitate a legal crisis, but “would more than satisfy the supreme court which has wanted nothing more than a rational justification for the question”. | One Trump adviser, former federal judge Michael Luttig, argued that executive action by Trump would not precipitate a legal crisis, but “would more than satisfy the supreme court which has wanted nothing more than a rational justification for the question”. |
| But Luttig appeared to be among a small minority to think that. | But Luttig appeared to be among a small minority to think that. |
| “He won’t defy a court order,” tweeted Marty Lederman, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, about Trump. “Nor will he issue an executive order directing the bureau to add the question. Eventually, Secretary Ross will issue a new directive with a new rationale, and *that* will be subject to legal challenge.” | “He won’t defy a court order,” tweeted Marty Lederman, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, about Trump. “Nor will he issue an executive order directing the bureau to add the question. Eventually, Secretary Ross will issue a new directive with a new rationale, and *that* will be subject to legal challenge.” |
| The attorney general, William Barr, said earlier this week that he saw a legal path forward to including the question. “I agree with [Trump] that the supreme court decision was wrong,” Barr told the Associated Press, adding that he believes there is “an opportunity potentially to cure the lack of clarity that was the problem and we might as well take a shot at doing that”. | The attorney general, William Barr, said earlier this week that he saw a legal path forward to including the question. “I agree with [Trump] that the supreme court decision was wrong,” Barr told the Associated Press, adding that he believes there is “an opportunity potentially to cure the lack of clarity that was the problem and we might as well take a shot at doing that”. |
| But the Trump administration appeared to be running out of options. A federal court dealt a blow to the administration earlier this week by refusing a justice department request to change its legal team on the case. “Defendants provide no reasons, let alone ‘satisfactory reasons’, for the substitution of counsel,” wrote the judge in a blistering denial. | But the Trump administration appeared to be running out of options. A federal court dealt a blow to the administration earlier this week by refusing a justice department request to change its legal team on the case. “Defendants provide no reasons, let alone ‘satisfactory reasons’, for the substitution of counsel,” wrote the judge in a blistering denial. |
| Trump said last week that he was contemplating ordering the commerce department to print the question on the census, regardless of the supreme court ruling. | Trump said last week that he was contemplating ordering the commerce department to print the question on the census, regardless of the supreme court ruling. |
| “We’re thinking about doing that,” Trump said. “It’s one of the ways. We have four or five ways we can do it. It’s one of the ways and we’re thinking about doing it very seriously.” | “We’re thinking about doing that,” Trump said. “It’s one of the ways. We have four or five ways we can do it. It’s one of the ways and we’re thinking about doing it very seriously.” |
| Census | Census |
| US immigration | US immigration |
| Donald Trump | Donald Trump |
| US politics | US politics |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |