This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/18/nyregion/michael-cohen-trump-investigation.html

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Trump Campaign Finance Inquiry Was Expanded, Prosecutors Disclose New Charges in Trump Campaign Finance Inquiry Are Unlikely, Prosecutors Signal
(32 minutes later)
Federal prosecutors confirmed for the first time, in documents released Thursday, that they had expanded their investigation into campaign finance violations involving President Trump to include whether at least one person lied to investigators or tried to obstruct the inquiry. Federal prosecutors signaled in a court document released on Thursday that it was unlikely they would file additional charges in the hush-money investigation that ensnared members of Donald J. Trump’s inner circle and threatened to derail his presidency.
The prosecutors, however, said their investigations had “effectively concluded,” signaling that it was unlikely they planned to file additional charges. In the document, the prosecutors said they had “effectively concluded” their inquiry, which centered on payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign to buy the silence of two women who said they had had affairs with Mr. Trump.
The disclosure came in a document filed this week with William H. Pauley III, a federal judge in Manhattan. The judge had ordered the prosecutors to publicly release a number of documents related to their investigation, which centered on payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign to buy the silence of two women who said they had had affairs with Mr. Trump. The prosecutors with the United States attorney’s office in Manhattan also revealed for the first time that they had expanded their investigation from campaign finance violations to include whether “certain individuals” lied to investigators or tried to obstruct the inquiry.
The documents included a report from the prosecutors with the United States attorney’s office in Manhattan indicating that as of Monday, they had ended their investigations not only into possible campaign finance violations but also into whether “certain individuals” had committed perjury or obstruction of justice during the inquiry. The brief report did not identify the targets of those investigations, although it contained redactions of what appeared to be at least one name. That investigation has also ended, prosecutors said.
The brief report did not identify the targets of those investigations, although it contained several redactions of what appeared to be at least one name. The disclosures came in a document filed with William H. Pauley III, a federal judge in Manhattan. The judge had ordered the prosecutors on Wednesday to publicly release a number of documents related to their investigation.
As recently as this spring, prosecutors were still considering whether one Trump Organization executive was untruthful when testifying before the grand jury, according to people briefed on the matter. The president’s former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, was convicted in the case. He has said he helped arrange the hush money at the direction of Mr. Trump, and prosecutors have repeated the accusation in court papers. Mr. Cohen is serving a three-year prison sentence.
One member of the president’s inner circle, Michael D. Cohen, the president’s former lawyer, was convicted in the case. He has said he helped arrange the hush money at the direction of Mr. Trump, and prosecutors have repeated the accusation in court papers. Mr. Cohen is serving a three-year prison sentence.
Mr. Trump has denied the affairs and any campaign finance violations.Mr. Trump has denied the affairs and any campaign finance violations.
As recently as this spring, prosecutors were still considering whether one Trump Organization executive was untruthful when testifying before the grand jury, according to people briefed on the matter.
The search warrant documents shed light on the breadth of evidence the prosecutors amassed against Mr. Cohen even before searching his property and interviewing a number of witnesses. The prosecutors initially had released the documents in March, with nearly every detail of the campaign finance evidence redacted.The search warrant documents shed light on the breadth of evidence the prosecutors amassed against Mr. Cohen even before searching his property and interviewing a number of witnesses. The prosecutors initially had released the documents in March, with nearly every detail of the campaign finance evidence redacted.
The Trump Organization reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the hush money he paid to Stormy Daniels, a pornographic film actress. Mr. Cohen also urged American Media Inc., which publishes The National Enquirer, to buy the rights to a former Playboy model’s story of an affair with Mr. Trump. Both deals effectively silenced the women in the run-up to the 2016 election.The Trump Organization reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the hush money he paid to Stormy Daniels, a pornographic film actress. Mr. Cohen also urged American Media Inc., which publishes The National Enquirer, to buy the rights to a former Playboy model’s story of an affair with Mr. Trump. Both deals effectively silenced the women in the run-up to the 2016 election.