This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/11/opinion/confederate-monuments-charlottesville.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
What Changed in Charlottesville What Changed in Charlottesville
(32 minutes later)
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Two years ago this week, hundreds of white nationalists descended on Charlottesville, Va., under the pretense of protesting the city’s decision to remove a monument to Robert E. Lee from a public park.CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Two years ago this week, hundreds of white nationalists descended on Charlottesville, Va., under the pretense of protesting the city’s decision to remove a monument to Robert E. Lee from a public park.
They were joined by old-guard white supremacists like David Duke, and before they were through, a young man, inspired by this gathering and the white supremacist ideology, drove his car into a crowd of peaceful counterdemonstrators, injuring several dozen and killing a young woman, Heather Heyer.They were joined by old-guard white supremacists like David Duke, and before they were through, a young man, inspired by this gathering and the white supremacist ideology, drove his car into a crowd of peaceful counterdemonstrators, injuring several dozen and killing a young woman, Heather Heyer.
Until Charlottesville, the debate over Confederate monuments was mostly about history, pitting claims about the preservation of Southern heritage against the monuments’ historical ties to slavery and Jim Crow. What has become crystal clear in the last two years is that these monuments are no longer relics of a horrendous past — they have been resurrected as symbols of white nationalism.Until Charlottesville, the debate over Confederate monuments was mostly about history, pitting claims about the preservation of Southern heritage against the monuments’ historical ties to slavery and Jim Crow. What has become crystal clear in the last two years is that these monuments are no longer relics of a horrendous past — they have been resurrected as symbols of white nationalism.
The people who showed up in Charlottesville were not there because of their nostalgia for the Confederacy. Many had no Confederate ancestry, nor were they Southern. They arrived angry about being displaced, or perhaps replaced, by immigrants; by women; by African-Americans; by anyone who, in effect, challenged white male patriarchy. They saw the potential removal of the Lee monument, a statue with historical links to white supremacy, as a siren call for their movement.The people who showed up in Charlottesville were not there because of their nostalgia for the Confederacy. Many had no Confederate ancestry, nor were they Southern. They arrived angry about being displaced, or perhaps replaced, by immigrants; by women; by African-Americans; by anyone who, in effect, challenged white male patriarchy. They saw the potential removal of the Lee monument, a statue with historical links to white supremacy, as a siren call for their movement.
The United Daughters of the Confederacy, the organization that sponsored the construction of most of the country’s Confederate monuments, has tried to distance itself from the white nationalists’ embrace of the women’s work in the first half of the 20th century. In December 2018, the organization’s president general, Nelma Crutchers, denounced “any individual or group that promotes racial divisiveness or white supremacy” and called “on these people to cease using Confederate symbols for their abhorrent and reprehensible purposes.”The United Daughters of the Confederacy, the organization that sponsored the construction of most of the country’s Confederate monuments, has tried to distance itself from the white nationalists’ embrace of the women’s work in the first half of the 20th century. In December 2018, the organization’s president general, Nelma Crutchers, denounced “any individual or group that promotes racial divisiveness or white supremacy” and called “on these people to cease using Confederate symbols for their abhorrent and reprehensible purposes.”
Of course, the fact that white supremacists have so easily attached themselves to the monument debate gives the lie to the assertion that it was ever simply about “Southern heritage.” In truth, as the monuments’ opponents have always claimed, honoring Lee or any other Confederate figure is to honor the brutal system of slavery they sought to defend, and the white supremacist ideology of the Jim Crow era during which the monuments were erected.Of course, the fact that white supremacists have so easily attached themselves to the monument debate gives the lie to the assertion that it was ever simply about “Southern heritage.” In truth, as the monuments’ opponents have always claimed, honoring Lee or any other Confederate figure is to honor the brutal system of slavery they sought to defend, and the white supremacist ideology of the Jim Crow era during which the monuments were erected.
Ms. Crutchers, like other modern defenders of the Confederate past, suggests that such assertions are just a matter of interpretation and historical relativism, and that we should not “impose the standards of the 21st century on these Americans of the 19th century.”Ms. Crutchers, like other modern defenders of the Confederate past, suggests that such assertions are just a matter of interpretation and historical relativism, and that we should not “impose the standards of the 21st century on these Americans of the 19th century.”
Her predecessors had fewer qualms about embracing white supremacy. Mildred Rutherford, who served as the organization’s historian in the early part of the 20th century, made it her personal crusade see to it that future generations of white children were not “misinformed” about Southern slavery. She spoke of how former slaves were “savage to the last degree” and claimed that “slavery was no disgrace to the owner or the owned.” Her predecessors had fewer qualms about embracing white supremacy. Mildred Rutherford, who served as the organization’s historian in the early part of the 20th century, made it her personal crusade to see to it that future generations of white children were not “misinformed” about Southern slavery. She spoke of how former slaves were “savage to the last degree” and claimed that “slavery was no disgrace to the owner or the owned.”
Lizzie George Henderson, an early president general of the organization, praised her father, Senator James Z. George, for writing the Mississippi Plan of 1890, which systematically excluded black men from politics. According to Henderson, the plan, adopted by other states of the former Confederacy, placed “white supremacy on an enduring and constitutional basis.”Lizzie George Henderson, an early president general of the organization, praised her father, Senator James Z. George, for writing the Mississippi Plan of 1890, which systematically excluded black men from politics. According to Henderson, the plan, adopted by other states of the former Confederacy, placed “white supremacy on an enduring and constitutional basis.”
The women who raised the money to build the monuments understood the connections between these symbols and white supremacy. African-Americans and their ancestors who were persecuted under the system of Jim Crow have made the connection, as have many white Southerners. And the men who organized and participated in the Charlottesville uprising made that connection.The women who raised the money to build the monuments understood the connections between these symbols and white supremacy. African-Americans and their ancestors who were persecuted under the system of Jim Crow have made the connection, as have many white Southerners. And the men who organized and participated in the Charlottesville uprising made that connection.
But there is a large group of white Americans who are hesitant to acknowledge the link between white supremacist ideology and Confederate monuments. They are the same Americans who hesitate to criticize an inhumane immigration policy, and the hateful rhetoric President Trump has directed at members of Congress and entire American cities.But there is a large group of white Americans who are hesitant to acknowledge the link between white supremacist ideology and Confederate monuments. They are the same Americans who hesitate to criticize an inhumane immigration policy, and the hateful rhetoric President Trump has directed at members of Congress and entire American cities.
We cannot simply romanticize founding fathers and Confederate leaders, or quote from great speeches about our democracy, if we are not also willing to acknowledge the nation’s racist underbelly. And this is not just about the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the monuments it erected. It’s about white Americans looking into the mirror and taking stock of the past.We cannot simply romanticize founding fathers and Confederate leaders, or quote from great speeches about our democracy, if we are not also willing to acknowledge the nation’s racist underbelly. And this is not just about the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the monuments it erected. It’s about white Americans looking into the mirror and taking stock of the past.
Nor is it, any longer, just about the past. When white nationalists look at these monuments, they do not get teary-eyed about lost causes and noble Southern men in gray. They feel emboldened by the racist vision that unites America’s white-supremacist past and the future they are fighting for — one in which people of color and women are again subjugated under the rule of white men.Nor is it, any longer, just about the past. When white nationalists look at these monuments, they do not get teary-eyed about lost causes and noble Southern men in gray. They feel emboldened by the racist vision that unites America’s white-supremacist past and the future they are fighting for — one in which people of color and women are again subjugated under the rule of white men.
Confederate monuments can no longer be debated solely as objects of history, when they have become rallying points for a violent movement. We cannot afford to be hesitant. We must speak truth to power and act accordingly. Our democracy is at stake.Confederate monuments can no longer be debated solely as objects of history, when they have become rallying points for a violent movement. We cannot afford to be hesitant. We must speak truth to power and act accordingly. Our democracy is at stake.
Karen J. Cox is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and the author, most recently, of “Dixie’s Daughters: The United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Preservation of Confederate Culture.”Karen J. Cox is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and the author, most recently, of “Dixie’s Daughters: The United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Preservation of Confederate Culture.”
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.