This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/24/us/michael-drejka-stand-your-ground.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
‘Stand Your Ground’ Trial in Florida Ends With Manslaughter Verdict ‘Stand Your Ground’ Trial in Florida Ends With Manslaughter Verdict
(32 minutes later)
In a test of the self-defense law known as “Stand Your Ground,” a Florida jury on Friday night found Michael Drejka guilty of manslaughter for killing Markeis McGlockton after an argument over a parking spot escalated outside a convenience store in Clearwater, Fla., last summer. In a test of the self-defense law known as “Stand Your Ground,” a Florida jury on Friday night found Michael Drejka guilty of manslaughter for killing Markeis McGlockton, after an argument over a parking spot escalated outside a convenience store in Clearwater, Fla., last summer.
After the death of Mr. McGlockton, who was black and unarmed, officials did not arrest Mr. Drejka, who is white, for three weeks, citing the state’s self-defense laws. Citing the state’s self-defense law, the county sheriff did not arrest Mr. Drejka, who is white, until three weeks after he fatally shot Mr. McGlockton, who was black and unarmed.
The citing of the law, as well as the races of the men, reminded many of the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, in Sanford, Fla., in 2012. The mention of the law, as well as the races of the men, reminded many of the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, in Sanford, Fla., in 2012.
Prosecutors in Pinellas County, Fla., eventually charged Mr. Drejka, who is white, with one count of manslaughter. He did not testify in the trial, according to The Associated Press, and the six-person jury deliberated for about six hours on Friday. Prosecutors in Pinellas County, Fla., eventually charged Mr. Drejka with one count of manslaughter. He did not testify in the trial, and the six-person jury deliberated for about six hours before reaching a verdict on Friday.
The maximum sentence Mr. Drejka could face is 30 years in prison. He had been free on bond since September 2018, but a judge remanded him to jail after the verdict, according to court records. Mr. Drejka’s sentencing hearing has been set for Oct. 10, and he could face up to 30 years in prison. He had been free on bond since last September, but a judge remanded him to jail after the verdict, according to court records.
Mr. Drejka was “frustrated” and “mystified” by the ruling, one of his lawyers said, vowing to appeal.
“He doesn’t know how it went from the sheriff saying he committed no crime to the state attorney then charging him and so aggressively pursuing him,” the lawyer, John Trevena, said on Saturday morning.
Mr. Trevena said the state attorney’s office had caved to political pressure from activists — including the Rev. Al Sharpton and the lawyer Benjamin Crump — by filing charges in the first place.
After the verdict was read, prosecutors hugged and consoled members of Mr. McGlockton’s family, according to The Tampa Bay Times.
“We’ve had to listen to that defense team talk down your son quite a bit now. No more,” the newspaper quoted Fred Schaub, an assistant state attorney, as telling the family in a hallway outside of the courtroom.
On July 19, 2018, Mr. McGlockton, 28, was in the convenience store with his 5-year-old son while his girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, and two small children were sitting in a car parked in a handicapped space. Mr. Drejka, 49, approached the car and started arguing with Ms. Jacobs about parking in the space without a handicap permit, according to the sheriff.On July 19, 2018, Mr. McGlockton, 28, was in the convenience store with his 5-year-old son while his girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, and two small children were sitting in a car parked in a handicapped space. Mr. Drejka, 49, approached the car and started arguing with Ms. Jacobs about parking in the space without a handicap permit, according to the sheriff.
In grainy surveillance footage of the scene, Mr. McGlockton leaves the store, approaches Mr. Drejka and shoves him to the ground. Mr. McGlockton then appears to take a few steps back from Mr. Drejka, who pulls out a gun while sitting on the pavement and shoots Mr. McGlockton once in the chest.In grainy surveillance footage of the scene, Mr. McGlockton leaves the store, approaches Mr. Drejka and shoves him to the ground. Mr. McGlockton then appears to take a few steps back from Mr. Drejka, who pulls out a gun while sitting on the pavement and shoots Mr. McGlockton once in the chest.
Mr. McGlockton was seen stumbling back into the store, clutching his wound. He collapsed next to his son and was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.Mr. McGlockton was seen stumbling back into the store, clutching his wound. He collapsed next to his son and was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
Mr. Trevena said he would argue, in his appeal, that the jury should not have been allowed to view surveillance video in slow motion given the importance that the quick pace of events had on the defense team’s argument. The lawyers also plan to argue that the Pinellas County sheriff, himself a former lawyer, should have been allowed to testify about why he declined to charge Mr. Drejka.
Originally passed in 2005, the law allows people to use deadly force without first trying to retreat from a dangerous situation if they “reasonably believe” that their lives are threatened. The law received support from the National Rifle Association but was vigorously opposed by law enforcement officers.Originally passed in 2005, the law allows people to use deadly force without first trying to retreat from a dangerous situation if they “reasonably believe” that their lives are threatened. The law received support from the National Rifle Association but was vigorously opposed by law enforcement officers.
A majority of states have adopted laws that are similar to Florida’s, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Violence.A majority of states have adopted laws that are similar to Florida’s, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Violence.
In 2017, the Florida Legislature strengthened the law, shifting the burden of proof to prosecutors: Defendants are no longer required to offer evidence, typically by taking the stand, to prove their claim to Stand Your Ground.In 2017, the Florida Legislature strengthened the law, shifting the burden of proof to prosecutors: Defendants are no longer required to offer evidence, typically by taking the stand, to prove their claim to Stand Your Ground.
After Mr. Martin was killed, the police invoked the Stand Your Ground law when they initially declined to arrest George Zimmerman, who had fired the weapon. Mr. Zimmerman argued that he acted in self-defense but did not offer a Stand Your Ground case. He was acquitted when a jury found he was justified in pulling the trigger.After Mr. Martin was killed, the police invoked the Stand Your Ground law when they initially declined to arrest George Zimmerman, who had fired the weapon. Mr. Zimmerman argued that he acted in self-defense but did not offer a Stand Your Ground case. He was acquitted when a jury found he was justified in pulling the trigger.
Critics of the law say it is a shoot-first law that inflames already violent confrontations, and the Trayvon Martin case brought renewed scrutiny to racial profiling.Critics of the law say it is a shoot-first law that inflames already violent confrontations, and the Trayvon Martin case brought renewed scrutiny to racial profiling.
“You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot I said that this could have been my son,” President Barack Obama said at the time. “Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.”“You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot I said that this could have been my son,” President Barack Obama said at the time. “Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.”
The six jurors had to decide whether Mr. Drejka feared being killed and justifiably shot Mr. McGlockton after he knocked him to the pavement. In the video, which was shown at the trial, it is clear Mr. McGlockton was stepping away from the confrontation. But Mr. Drejka has told the authorities he was fearful that he was going to be struck again. The six jurors had to decide whether Mr. Drejka reasonably feared being killed or greatly harmed and justifiably shot Mr. McGlockton after he knocked him to the pavement. In the video, which was shown at the trial, it is clear Mr. McGlockton was stepping away from the confrontation. But Mr. Drejka has told the authorities he was blindsided by the shove and was fearful that he was going to be struck again.
Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs contributed reporting. Mr. Drejka’s lawyers said that even though there was video, people watched what happened and had conflicting views of who was in the right.
“This case really divided the community,” said one of his lawyers, Theresa Jean-Pierre Coy. “As the only African-American female that was on the team, I’m getting a lot of pushback and unfavorable response as a result, especially from other defense attorneys.”
She said she had taken an oath to defend clients regardless of their race.