This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-47391821

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Afghanistan: Has the war cost America $500bn? Afghanistan war: What has the conflict cost the US?
(6 months later)
The US military has spent billions of dollars since 2001 fighting the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan. There've been months of negotiations between the US and the Taliban to try to end the conflict and reach a peace deal in Afghanistan.
There's now uncertainty over diplomatic efforts to bring an end to America's military presence there after an upsurge in violence. President Donald Trump has often said that he's keen to bring soldiers home from America's longest-running war.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has said the war has "cost the United States government and society $500bn". So we've been looking at how much the US has spent in Afghanistan since the war began.
How accurate is this figure and how might it have been reached? What forces did the US send?
The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001, accusing the Taliban of harbouring Osama bin Laden and senior al-Qaeda figures linked to the 9/11 attacks. The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 to oust the Taliban, whom they said were harbouring Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda figures linked to the 9/11 attacks.
They removed the Taliban from power, after which the militant group started a long-running insurgency across the country. US troop numbers in Afghanistan grew as Washington poured in billions of dollars to fight a Taliban insurgency and fund reconstruction.
US troop numbers in Afghanistan grew as Washington poured in billions of dollars to fight the Taliban and fund reconstruction. Between 2010 to 2012, when the US for a time had more than 100,000 soldiers in the country, the cost of the war grew to almost $100bn a year, according to US government figures.
Between 2010 to 2012, when the US for a time had more than 100,000 soldiers in the country, the cost of the war grew to almost $100bn a year, according to figures provided by the US government. As the US military shifted its focus away from offensive operations and concentrated more on training up Afghan forces, costs fell sharply.
As the US military shifted its focus away from offensive operations and concentrated more on training Afghan forces, costs fell sharply and between 2016 and 2018 annual expenditure was around $40bn. Between 2016 and 2018 annual expenditure was around $40bn, and the estimated spend for 2019 (up to September) is $38bn.
The estimated spend for the year to March 2019 is $18bn. According to the US Department of Defense, the total military expenditure in Afghanistan (from October 2001 until September 2019) was $778bn.
So, according to the US Department of Defense, the total military expenditure in Afghanistan (from October 2001 until March 2019) was $760bn. In addition, the US State Department - along with the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and other government agencies - spent $44bn on reconstruction projects.
That's significantly more than the figure given by the Afghan president. That brings the total cost - based on official data - to $822bn since the war began in 2001, but it doesn't include any spending in Pakistan, which the US uses as a base for Afghan-related operations.
But it doesn't include spending in Pakistan, which the US uses as a base for Afghan-related operations.
An independent study carried out by Brown University's Cost of War Project argues that the official US figures for the Afghan war are a substantial underestimate.An independent study carried out by Brown University's Cost of War Project argues that the official US figures for the Afghan war are a substantial underestimate.
It says that Congress has approved funds amounting to about one trillion dollars for Afghanistan as well as for Pakistan.It says that Congress has approved funds amounting to about one trillion dollars for Afghanistan as well as for Pakistan.
Neta Crawford, co-director of the Cost of the War Project, also says this "does not include any of the other costs for war veterans' care, money spent on other government departments for war-related activities and the cost of interest on debt incurred to pay for the conflict,"Neta Crawford, co-director of the Cost of the War Project, also says this "does not include any of the other costs for war veterans' care, money spent on other government departments for war-related activities and the cost of interest on debt incurred to pay for the conflict,"
If you factor this in, the cost is closer to two trillion dollars, she adds.If you factor this in, the cost is closer to two trillion dollars, she adds.
Where has the money gone?Where has the money gone?
The bulk of the money has been spent on counter-insurgency operations, and on the needs of US troops, such as food, clothing, medical care, special pay and benefits. The bulk of the money has been spent on counter-insurgency operations, and on the needs of US troops such as food, clothing, medical care, special pay and benefits.
Official data shows the US has also contributed approximately $133bn -16% of all money spent in the last 17 years - to reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan. Official data shows the US has also contributed approximately $137bn -16% of all money spent in the last 18 years - to reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.
And more than half of that ($83bn) has gone on building up Afghan security forces, including the Afghan National Army and police force. And more than half of that ($86bn) has gone on building up Afghan security forces, including the Afghan National Army and police force.
The rest has been mainly spent on improving governance and infrastructure, as well as on economic and humanitarian aid and anti-drug initiatives.The rest has been mainly spent on improving governance and infrastructure, as well as on economic and humanitarian aid and anti-drug initiatives.
The US has spent on average $1.5m day - or nearly $9bn since 2002 until June this year - on anti-narcotics efforts, yet the area devoted to growing opium poppy has actually increased, according to UN figures. The US has spent on average $1.5m day - or nearly $9bn since 2002 until September last year - on anti-narcotics efforts, yet UN figures show that the total estimated area devoted to opium poppy cultivation reached a record high in 2017.
In 2017, the US watchdog responsible for the oversight of reconstruction efforts said that as much as $15.5bn had been lost on "waste, fraud and abuse" over the past 11 years.In 2017, the US watchdog responsible for the oversight of reconstruction efforts said that as much as $15.5bn had been lost on "waste, fraud and abuse" over the past 11 years.
That figure is probably "only a portion" of the total waste, according to the watchdog, which added that US money "often exacerbated conflicts, enabled corruption, and bolstered support for insurgents".That figure is probably "only a portion" of the total waste, according to the watchdog, which added that US money "often exacerbated conflicts, enabled corruption, and bolstered support for insurgents".
What about the human cost?What about the human cost?
Since the war against the Taliban began in 2001, US forces have suffered 2,300 deaths and around 20,500 soldiers injured in action. Since the war against the Taliban began in 2001, US forces have suffered more than 2,300 deaths and around 20,660 soldiers injured in action.
According to official figures, approximately 14,000 US military personnel were in Afghanistan as of June 2018, but there were also nearly 11,000 US civilians who were working as contractors. According to official figures, approximately 13,000 US military personnel were in Afghanistan as of December 2019, but there were also nearly 11,000 US civilians who were working as contractors.
But US casualty figures are dwarfed by the loss of life among Afghan security forces and civilians.But US casualty figures are dwarfed by the loss of life among Afghan security forces and civilians.
President Ghani said this year that more than 45,000 members of the Afghan security forces had been killed since he became president in 2014. President Ghani said last year that more than 45,000 members of the Afghan security forces had been killed since he became president in 2014.
Mr Ghani's decision to reveal casualty figures was unusual, as the US and Afghan governments don't normally publish Afghan death tolls. Mr Ghani's decision to reveal casualty figures was unusual as the US and Afghan governments don't normally publish Afghan death tolls.
However, some reports say that Afghan security force fatalities have been very high in recent years, sometimes averaging 30-40 deaths a day. However, some media reports say that in recent years Afghan security force fatalities have been very high, sometimes averaging 30-40 deaths a day.
And according to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama), more than 32,000 civilians have been killed and about 60,000 injured since it began systematically recording civilian casualties in 2009. And according to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama), more than 100,000 civilians have been killed or injured since it began systematically recording civilian casualties in 2009.
Read more from Reality CheckRead more from Reality Check
Send us your questionsSend us your questions
Follow us on TwitterFollow us on Twitter