This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-49568760

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Brexit: Judge rejects parliament shutdown legal challenge Brexit: Judge rejects parliament shutdown legal challenge
(32 minutes later)
A Scottish judge has rejected a bid to have Boris Johnson's plan to shut down parliament ahead of Brexit declared illegal.A Scottish judge has rejected a bid to have Boris Johnson's plan to shut down parliament ahead of Brexit declared illegal.
The case was brought to the Court of Session in Edinburgh by a cross-party group of 75 parliamentarians, who argued the PM had exceeded his powers.The case was brought to the Court of Session in Edinburgh by a cross-party group of 75 parliamentarians, who argued the PM had exceeded his powers.
But Lord Doherty ruled on Wednesday that the issue was for politicians and voters to judge, and not the courts.But Lord Doherty ruled on Wednesday that the issue was for politicians and voters to judge, and not the courts.
He said there had been no contravention of the law by the UK government.He said there had been no contravention of the law by the UK government.
The group of MPs and peers behind the legal challenge, who are headed by SNP MP Joanna Cherry and Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson, have indicated they will appeal against the ruling. The group of MPs and peers behind the legal challenge, who are headed by SNP MP Joanna Cherry and Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson, have said they will appeal against the ruling.
The prime minister announced on 28 August he wanted to shut down Parliament, a process known as proroguing, ahead of a Queen's Speech on 14 October. The appeal would almost certainly be heard this week - and potentially as early as Wednesday afternoon.
The prime minister announced on 28 August he wanted to shut down Parliament, a process known as proroguing, for five weeks ahead of a Queen's Speech on 14 October.
His political opponents argue Mr Johnson's aim is to avoid parliamentary scrutiny and to stop them passing legislation that would prevent the UK leaving the European Union without a deal on 31 October.His political opponents argue Mr Johnson's aim is to avoid parliamentary scrutiny and to stop them passing legislation that would prevent the UK leaving the European Union without a deal on 31 October.
The UK government insists this is not the case, and says proroguing Parliament will allow Mr Johnson to set out his "exciting" legislative plans in the Queen's Speech while still allowing sufficient time for MPs to debate Brexit. The UK government insists this is not the case, and says proroguing Parliament will allow Mr Johnson to set out his legislative plans in the Queen's Speech while still allowing sufficient time for MPs to debate Brexit.
In his ruling, Lord Doherty said the decision to prorogue parliament was justiciable - a matter for the courts -in some circumstances but not in others, depending on the context. In his ruling, Lord Doherty said the decision to prorogue parliament was justiciable - a matter for the courts - in some circumstances but not in others, depending on the context.
But he told the court that he had not been persuaded after hearing legal arguments from both sides on Tuesday that this case was justiciable.But he told the court that he had not been persuaded after hearing legal arguments from both sides on Tuesday that this case was justiciable.
He added: "In my view, the advice given in relation to the prorogation decision is a matter involving high policy and political judgement.He added: "In my view, the advice given in relation to the prorogation decision is a matter involving high policy and political judgement.
"This is political territory and decision making which cannot be measured against legal standards, but only by political judgements."This is political territory and decision making which cannot be measured against legal standards, but only by political judgements.
"Accountability for the advice is to parliament, and ultimately the electorate - not to the courts.""Accountability for the advice is to parliament, and ultimately the electorate - not to the courts."
Responding to the ruling, Ms Cherry said it would be immediately appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session and then to the Supreme Court in London.
Ms Cherry, who is a QC, added: "The idea that if the prime minister suspends Parliament the courts can't get involved looses some ugly demons.
"If he can do it for 34 days why not 34 weeks or 34 months? Where does the political power end? It is not the law as I understand it."
It emerged during Tuesday's hearing that Mr Johnson appears to have approved a plan to shut down the UK Parliament two weeks before publicly announcing it.
The Court of Session heard that the prime minister was sent a note on 15 August asking if he wanted to prorogue parliament from mid-September.
A tick and the word "yes" was written on the document.
Prorogation in a nutshellProrogation in a nutshell
Parliament is normally suspended - or prorogued - for a short period before a new session begins. It is done by the Queen, on the advice of the prime minister.Parliament is normally suspended - or prorogued - for a short period before a new session begins. It is done by the Queen, on the advice of the prime minister.
Parliamentary sessions normally last a year, but the current one has been going on for more than two years - ever since the June 2017 election.Parliamentary sessions normally last a year, but the current one has been going on for more than two years - ever since the June 2017 election.
When Parliament is prorogued, no debates and votes are held - and most laws that haven't completed their passage through Parliament die a death.When Parliament is prorogued, no debates and votes are held - and most laws that haven't completed their passage through Parliament die a death.
This is different to "dissolving" Parliament - where all MPs give up their seats to campaign in a general election.This is different to "dissolving" Parliament - where all MPs give up their seats to campaign in a general election.
The last two times Parliament was suspended for a Queen's Speech that was not after a general election, the closures lasted for four and 13 working days respectively.The last two times Parliament was suspended for a Queen's Speech that was not after a general election, the closures lasted for four and 13 working days respectively.
If this prorogation happens as expected, it will see Parliament closed for 23 working days.If this prorogation happens as expected, it will see Parliament closed for 23 working days.
MPs have to approve recess dates, but they cannot block prorogation.MPs have to approve recess dates, but they cannot block prorogation.