This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49669811

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Trump immigration plans: Supreme Court allows curb on migrants Trump immigration plans: Supreme Court approves asylum curbs
(about 5 hours later)
The US Supreme Court has given the go-ahead to Trump administration plans that severely limit the ability of migrants to claim asylum.The US Supreme Court has given the go-ahead to Trump administration plans that severely limit the ability of migrants to claim asylum.
Under the rule, people arriving via a third country must claim asylum there first before arriving at the US border.Under the rule, people arriving via a third country must claim asylum there first before arriving at the US border.
Legal challenges against it continue but the ruling means for now it can be enforced nationwide.Legal challenges against it continue but the ruling means for now it can be enforced nationwide.
President Donald Trump tweeted that it was a "BIG United States Supreme Court WIN for the Border on Asylum!". The plan will affect migrants from Central America who travel north, often on foot, through Mexico.
Curbing migration to the US has been a key goal of his presidency and forms a major part of his bid for re-election in 2020. The Trump administration unveiled the new asylum policy in July but it was almost immediately blocked from taking effect by a lower court ruling by a judge in San Francisco.
When it was unveiled this year in July it was almost immediately blocked from taking effect so the move is being seen as a victory for the Trump administration in US media. There has been a legal tussle over his block since but the decision issued on Wednesday will temporarily delay his rulings and allow the policy to come into effect.
What do the changes mean? Curbing migration levels has been a key goal of Donald Trump's presidency and forms a major part of his bid for re-election in 2020.
Migrants from Central America travel north, often on foot, through Mexico until they reach the US border. Many of those arriving are fleeing violence or poverty. What will the changes mean?
In practice the changes mean that migrants from Honduras, Nicaragua and El Salvador must first claim asylum in a neighbouring country or Mexico. But it affects people from beyond the region too. The change will affect non-Mexican migrants trying to enter through the US southern border.
This includes, but is not limited to, those from Central American countries who have made up the vast majority of those seeking asylum so far this year.
Of the 424,000 family members arrested on the south-western border up until August 2019 almost 419,831 were from Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua and only 4,312 were from Mexico, border patrol data show.
Many of those arriving are fleeing violence or poverty and travel north through Mexico until they reach the US border. Upon arrival, they must pass a "credible fear" interview to seek asylum in the US.
The rule change means they would fail had they not claimed asylum in another country they had first passed through.
The American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged the ruling, argued it drastically limited those eligible for asylum.The American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged the ruling, argued it drastically limited those eligible for asylum.
"The current ban would eliminate virtually all asylum at the southern border, even at ports of entry, for everyone except Mexicans," it said in a petition."The current ban would eliminate virtually all asylum at the southern border, even at ports of entry, for everyone except Mexicans," it said in a petition.
A lawyer for the group described the ruling as a "temporary step" and said it remained confident at challenging the change.
"The lives of thousands of families are at stake," Lee Gelerent said.
Anyone who has been rejected by a third country or is a victim of human trafficking can still apply.Anyone who has been rejected by a third country or is a victim of human trafficking can still apply.
Trump's 'big win'
Analysis by David Willis, LA correspondent, BBC News
Facing a surge in asylum claims by Central American and other migrants who have been crossing the southern US border in record numbers, the Trump administration has been desperate to clamp down.
In July the President announced new rules restricting asylum applications from migrants from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala.
That move was immediately challenged in the lower courts, and it may come back to the Supreme Court once ongoing legal challenges have been completed.
But for now the president has something to celebrate - on Twitter he hailed the decision as a Big Win.
Why is this controversial?Why is this controversial?
The policy overturns long-standing convention that the US hears asylum claims however people have arrived at the border. The rule change overturns long-standing convention that the US hears asylum claims no matter how people have arrived at the border.
On the nine-judge Supreme Court liberal-leaning Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the ruling. On the nine-judge Supreme Court, liberal-leaning Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the ruling.
"Once again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution," Justice Sotomayor wrote."Once again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution," Justice Sotomayor wrote.
The route to the US is dangerous, with Central American migrants often deliberately sought out by gangs in neighbouring countries because they are vulnerable.The route to the US is dangerous, with Central American migrants often deliberately sought out by gangs in neighbouring countries because they are vulnerable.
There are questions over whether Mexico and Guatemala can cope with a surge in asylum claimants.There are questions over whether Mexico and Guatemala can cope with a surge in asylum claimants.
Mexico has also repeatedly refused to become a US "third country" meaning it would be obliged to first consider asylum claims from people wanting to enter the US. Mexican officials, who have been working to crack down on migration, have already pushed back strongly against the plan.
Step into the shoes of a migrant Earlier this week, Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard reiterated that Mexico would not become a "third country" for US-bound asylum seekers.
Maria is fictional. But everything that happens to her here is based on the real experiences of migrants who have travelled to America, experiences that have been documented by rights groups, journalists and lawyers. The Mexican president, Andres Manuel Labrador, earlier on Wednesday posted an image of himself on the phone to President Trump.
See for yourself the decisions and dangers a migrant like Maria may face. They are yet to publicly comment on the Supreme Court's latest ruling - which is the second in favour of Mr Trump's migration plans so far this year.
In July the nation's top court ruled Mr Trump can use $2.5bn (£2bn) of Pentagon funds for his long-promised southern border wall.