This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/sep/26/peter-dutton-cannabis-christian-porter-challenge-act-law-legalise-drugs

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Peter Dutton: government may override 'dangerous' ACT decision to legalise cannabis Peter Dutton: government may override 'dangerous' ACT decision to legalise cannabis
(32 minutes later)
Christian Porter has warned Australian Capital Territory cannabis users they may not be protected by a new law legalising recreational use, weighing in alongside home affairs minister Peter Dutton against the law. Christian Porter has warned Australian Capital Territory cannabis users they may not be protected by a new law legalising recreational use, weighing in alongside the home affairs minister, Peter Dutton, against the law.
On Thursday, Dutton described the new laws as unconscionable, comments interpreted as urging the attorney general to challenge or overturn the ACT law, passed on Wednesday. On Thursday Dutton described the new laws as unconscionable, comments interpreted as urging the attorney general to challenge or overturn the ACT law, passed on Wednesday.
“I think it might be trendy for the ACT government to go down this path, and they’ll say they’re enlightened and progressive and all the rest of it,” Dutton told 2GB radio. “But I think it’s dangerous … Christian Porter is having a look at it at the moment.”“I think it might be trendy for the ACT government to go down this path, and they’ll say they’re enlightened and progressive and all the rest of it,” Dutton told 2GB radio. “But I think it’s dangerous … Christian Porter is having a look at it at the moment.”
Porter played down – but did not rule out – the possibility of the commonwealth directly overriding the laws. He told Guardian Australia the laws are “obviously a matter for the ACT” and he will consider “what issues may arise to the enforcement of existing commonwealth laws that criminalise the possession of prohibited drugs, including marijuana”.Porter played down – but did not rule out – the possibility of the commonwealth directly overriding the laws. He told Guardian Australia the laws are “obviously a matter for the ACT” and he will consider “what issues may arise to the enforcement of existing commonwealth laws that criminalise the possession of prohibited drugs, including marijuana”.
Porter told 6PR Radio he “personally [thinks] this is a very bad idea” but argued cannabis possession was “very different” to instances where the commonwealth had intervened to override the ACT on same-sex marriage and euthanasia. Porter told 6PR Radio he “[thinks] this is a very bad idea” but argued cannabis possession was “very different” from instances where the commonwealth had intervened to override the ACT on same-sex marriage and euthanasia.
Porter warned it was an “open question” whether the ACT parliament had successfully overridden existing commonwealth offences.Porter warned it was an “open question” whether the ACT parliament had successfully overridden existing commonwealth offences.
“If you’re in the ACT waking up today and you want to possess marijuana, be careful, because there are commonwealth laws that still apply.” “If you’re in the ACT waking up today and you want to possess marijuana, be careful, because there are commonwealth laws that still apply,” he said.
Porter said he would ask the AFP their view but if the commonwealth laws still apply “the expectation would be commonwealth laws would be enforced”. He would ask the Australian federal police its view but if the commonwealth laws still applied “the expectation would be commonwealth laws would be enforced”.
Australian Capital Territory votes to legalise cannabis for personal useAustralian Capital Territory votes to legalise cannabis for personal use
The laws allow residents over 18 to possess up to 50 grams and grow two plants. Under existing legislation, people with up to 50 grams or two plants for personal use face fines. If paid within 60 days, they will not appear on a criminal record.The laws allow residents over 18 to possess up to 50 grams and grow two plants. Under existing legislation, people with up to 50 grams or two plants for personal use face fines. If paid within 60 days, they will not appear on a criminal record.
ACT’s chief minister has shrugged off concerns Canberrans will be targeted by federal prosecutors when the new scheme comes into effect next January. The territory’s police had been balancing the overlap with commonwealth for nearly three decades, Andrew Barr said. ACT’s chief minister shrugged off concerns Canberrans would be targeted by federal prosecutors when the scheme comes into effect in January. The territory’s police had been balancing the overlap with commonwealth for nearly three decades, Andrew Barr said.
“Does anyone seriously think the commonwealth DPP (director of public prosecutions) is going to spend all of their time, or a considerable amount of their time, prosecuting individuals in the ACT for the possession of less than 50 grams of cannabis?” he told ABC’s Radio National on Thursday. “Does anyone seriously think the commonwealth DPP [director of public prosecutions] is going to spend all of their time, or a considerable amount of their time, prosecuting individuals in the ACT for the possession of less than 50 grams of cannabis?” he told ABC’s Radio National on Thursday.
“It’s one thing for police to arrest someone, it’s another thing to successfully prosecute someone.”“It’s one thing for police to arrest someone, it’s another thing to successfully prosecute someone.”
Cannabis prohibition doesn't work anywhere. It's New Zealand's turn to legalise it | Helen ClarkCannabis prohibition doesn't work anywhere. It's New Zealand's turn to legalise it | Helen Clark
The existence of the ACT legislation was a defence if people were charged under commonwealth laws, Barr said. “My advice to everyone is that this is an evolution not a revolution,” he said.The existence of the ACT legislation was a defence if people were charged under commonwealth laws, Barr said. “My advice to everyone is that this is an evolution not a revolution,” he said.
Barr’s position had support from the commonwealth director of public prosecutions Sarah McNaughton, who wrote to the ACT government on 17 September suggesting the commonwealth law provides a defence for people engage in conduct “justified or excused” by a state or territory law. McNaughton also noted the CDPP would consider the defence when deciding whether to press charges. Barr’s position had support from the commonwealth director of public prosecutions, Sarah McNaughton, who wrote to the ACT government on 17 September suggesting the commonwealth law provided a defence for people engaged in conduct “justified or excused” by a state or territory law. McNaughton also noted the commonwealth director of public prosecutions would consider the defence when deciding whether to press charges.
But then on 22 September McNaughton withdrew her earlier advice, suggesting there were further unspecified “legal complexities”, declining to give a view on whether the ACT law could protect residents from commonwealth charges. But on 22 September McNaughton withdrew her earlier advice, suggesting there were further unspecified “legal complexities”, declining to give a view on whether the ACT law could protect residents from commonwealth charges.
On 23 September the attorney general’s department deputy secretary Sarah Chidgey agreed the ACT law could provide a defence but warned the “justification or excuse may need to be more explicitly identified” in the bill. On 23 September the attorney general’s department’s deputy secretary, Sarah Chidgey, agreed the ACT law could provide a defence but warned the “justification or excuse may need to be more explicitly identified” in the bill.
The territory’s shadow attorney general, Jeremy Hanson, still thinks legalisation is sending the wrong message, citing research showing marijuana’s link to psychosis. The territory’s shadow attorney general, Jeremy Hanson, thinks the legalisation was sending the wrong message, citing research showing marijuana’s link to psychosis.
Hanson is concerned it will lead to more drug driving and doesn’t believe the laws are enough of a deterrent. But he doesn’t expect the federal government to test the overlap in the courts. Hanson was concerned it would lead to more drug driving and did not believe the laws were enough of a deterrent. But he did not expect the federal government to test the overlap in the courts.
“A greater concern is an individual out there thinking they’re doing the right thing, thinking they’re doing something legal and finding themselves being charged with a commonwealth offence,” he told Sky News. “A greater concern is an individual out there thinking they’re doing the right thing, thinking they’re doing something legal, and finding themselves being charged with a commonwealth offence,” he told Sky News.
“The reality is we had a pretty good regime up until yesterday, it’s not like people were being thrown into jail for cannabis use holus-bolus.” “The reality is we had a pretty good regime up until yesterday. It’s not like people were being thrown into jail for cannabis use holus-bolus.”
Australian Capital TerritoryAustralian Capital Territory
CannabisCannabis
Peter DuttonPeter Dutton
DrugsDrugs
Law (Australia)Law (Australia)
Australian politicsAustralian politics
Christian PorterChristian Porter
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content