This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/world/europe/bbc-naga-munchetty.html
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
BBC Overturns Complaint Decision Against Naga Munchetty | BBC Overturns Complaint Decision Against Naga Munchetty |
(about 2 hours later) | |
The BBC’s director general has reversed the findings of a commission that ruled that Naga Munchetty, a veteran BBC news anchor, breached the company’s editorial guidelines when she criticized President Trump for saying that four female United States lawmakers should return to the “broken and crime infested places from which they came.” | |
The ruling from the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit brought a furious reaction from supporters of Ms. Munchetty and set off a broader debate about racism and double standards at the organization. Although Mr. Hall said in a statement on Monday that “these are often finely balanced and difficult judgments,” he elected to overrule the unit’s finding. | |
The complaint against Ms. Munchetty, a news anchor on the high-profile “BBC Breakfast” show, came after an exchange in July with her co-host, Dan Walker. | |
“Every time I have been told, as a woman of color, to go back to where I came from, that was embedded in racism,” said Ms. Munchetty, whose mother is from India and whose father is from Mauritius. “Now, I’m not accusing anyone of anything here, but you know what certain phrases mean.” | “Every time I have been told, as a woman of color, to go back to where I came from, that was embedded in racism,” said Ms. Munchetty, whose mother is from India and whose father is from Mauritius. “Now, I’m not accusing anyone of anything here, but you know what certain phrases mean.” |
She went on to say that it had made her “absolutely furious that a man in that position thinks it’s O.K. to skirt the lines by using language like that.” | She went on to say that it had made her “absolutely furious that a man in that position thinks it’s O.K. to skirt the lines by using language like that.” |
The Executive Complaints Unit said on Sept. 25 that its editorial guidelines allowed a personal response, but that Ms. Munchetty had gone too far because they “do not allow for journalists to give their opinions about the individual making the remarks or their motives for doing so — in this case President Trump.” | The Executive Complaints Unit said on Sept. 25 that its editorial guidelines allowed a personal response, but that Ms. Munchetty had gone too far because they “do not allow for journalists to give their opinions about the individual making the remarks or their motives for doing so — in this case President Trump.” |
The reprimand of Ms. Munchetty outraged journalists, members of Parliament, and fellow BBC staff members. | |
Sajid Javid, the chancellor of the Exchequer in the Conservative government, called the decision “ridiculous,” while Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the opposition Labour Party, said that the company “must explain this astonishing decision.” | Sajid Javid, the chancellor of the Exchequer in the Conservative government, called the decision “ridiculous,” while Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the opposition Labour Party, said that the company “must explain this astonishing decision.” |
Mr. Hall said on Monday that the company’s impartiality was fundamental, but he added that, “Racism is racism, and the BBC is not impartial on the topic.” | |