This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2019/oct/02/royal-shakespeare-company-to-end-bp-sponsorship-deal

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Royal Shakespeare Company to end BP sponsorship deal Royal Shakespeare Company to end BP sponsorship deal
(about 3 hours later)
The Royal Shakespeare Company is to end its sponsorship deal with BP after growing opposition to big oil’s involvement with the UK’s leading theatre company. The Royal Shakespeare Company is to end its sponsorship deal with BP amid growing opposition to big oil’s sponsorship of many of the UK’s leading cultural institutions.
The RSC announced on Wednesday that after months of deliberations and a vociferous campaign from artists, the public and environmentalists, it had decided to end its eight-year relationship. The RSC announced that after months of deliberations and a vociferous campaign from artists, the public and environmentalists, it had decided to curtail its eight-year relationship.
In a joint statement, Gregory Doran, the RSC’s artistic director, and Catherine Mallyon, its executive director, said there had been a “careful and often difficult debate” internally. The move will increase pressure on other cultural institutions such as the Royal Opera House, British Museum and National Portrait Gallery, which have all come under pressure over their tie-ins with fossil fuel companies.
It added: “Amidst the climate emergency, which we recognise, young people are now saying clearly to us that the BP sponsorship is putting a barrier between them and their wish to engage with the RSC. We cannot ignore that message.” Jess Worth, the co-director of the campaign group Culture Unstained, said the decision was “fantastic news” that signalled the end of fossil fuel sponsorship of the arts.
The sponsorship deal will end at the end of this year – more than two years before it was due to expire. “The RSC has understood that a climate emergency means that business as usual cannot continue, and we congratulate them for showing leadership,” she added.
There has been growing criticism of RSC’s sponsorship deal in the past year. In June, the Guardian revealed that Mark Rylance, who had been an associate artist with the RSC for 30 years, was resigning from his position, arguing BP’s sponsorship deal allowed the company to “obscure the destructive reality of its activities”, which he said threatened the future of the planet. In a joint statement, Gregory Doran, the RSC’s artistic director, and Catherine Mallyon, its executive director, said the decision had been taken after a “careful and often difficult debate” internally.
They added: “Amidst the climate emergency, which we recognise, young people are now saying clearly to us that the BP sponsorship is putting a barrier between them and their wish to engage with the RSC. We cannot ignore that message.”
The sponsorship deal will conclude at the end of this year – more than two years early.
There has been growing criticism of fossil fuel corporations involvement in the arts over the past year as concern about the scale and severity of the climate crisis grows.
In February, hundreds of people occupied the British Museum to object to its relationship with BP, and in June several leading artists wrote to the director of the National Portrait Gallery on the eve of its annual awards calling on it to end its links to the company.
Also in June, the Guardian revealed that Mark Rylance, who had been an associate artist with the RSC for 30 years, was resigning from his position, arguing BP’s sponsorship deal allowed the company to “obscure the destructive reality of its activities”, which he said threatened the future of the planet.
Last week, young people who had taken to the streets in huge numbers across the UK in the school climate strikes, said they would boycott the RSC unless it severed its ties with big oil.Last week, young people who had taken to the streets in huge numbers across the UK in the school climate strikes, said they would boycott the RSC unless it severed its ties with big oil.
The RSC statement said: “Central to our organisational values is that we listen to and respond to the views of young people.” The RSC statement said the growing opposition from young people had been a critical factor in its decision.
It added: “It is with all of this in mind that we have taken the difficult decision to conclude our partnership with BP at the end of this year. There are many fine balances and complex issues involved and the decision has not been taken lightly or swiftly.” “Central to our organisational values, is that we listen to and respond to the views of young people. Each year we actively engage 500,000 children and young people with Shakespeare’s plays … It is with all of this in mind that we have taken the difficult decision to conclude our partnership with BP at the end of this year. There are many fine balances and complex issues involved and the decision has not been taken lightly or swiftly.”
It thanked BP for its “generous support” since 2011. Adding that the ticket scheme that the oil giant subsidised for 16- to 25-year-olds had allowed tens of thousands to youngsters to access world-class performances. It thanked BP for its “generous support” since 2011, adding that the ticket scheme that the oil giant subsidised for 16- to 25-year-olds had allowed tens of thousands of young people to see world-class performances.
But BP said it was “disappointed and dismayed” by the decision. In a statement BP said it was “disappointed and dismayed” by the decision.
A statement by the company added: “We’re disappointed that this will bring a successful programme to a premature end. Over the past eight years our sponsorship has enabled 80,000 young people to see RSC performances at reduced rates.” “We’re disappointed that this will bring a successful programme to a premature end. Over the past eight years our sponsorship has enabled 80,000 young people to see RSC performances at reduced rates.”
It said it was dismayed because the oil giant shared “many of the concerns that apparently contributed to the decision”.It said it was dismayed because the oil giant shared “many of the concerns that apparently contributed to the decision”.
“We recognise the world is on an unsustainable path and needs to transition rapidly to net-zero in the coming decades. The debate centres around how to deliver this whilst meeting the world’s growing energy demands.” “We recognise the world is on an unsustainable path and needs to transition rapidly to net-zero [emissions] in the coming decades. The debate centres around how to deliver this whilst meeting the world’s growing energy demands … this global challenge needs everyone – companies, governments and individuals – to work together to achieve a low carbon future.”
It added that the “increasing polarisation of debate” was unhelpful. Rylance said he was delighted to hear of the decision. “I credit this change of heart within the RSC to the good people working there and the young people who expressed so powerfully their love for the RSC and Shakespeare and their concern for the future – a love and concern I share wholeheartedly,” he said in a statement.
“This global challenge needs everyone – companies, governments and individuals – to work together to achieve a low carbon future.” “Now, let us all hope that the good people within BP who are conscious of what an enormous difference BP could make in the world if it actually changed its ways and stopped blocking renewable energy, stopped investing in carbon extraction, stopped greenwashing its reputation and actually truthfully joined with the young people of Britain and lived up to their advertising as a ‘green’ company.”
Jess Worth, the co-director of the campaign group Culture Unstained, which has been spearheading the campaign against fossil fuel involvement in the arts, said it was “fantastic news” that RSC’s deal with BP was ending and a tribute to years of “creative opposition” from a range of groups. In 2016 BP signed a new five-year sponsorship deal worth £7.5m with four leading UK institutions – the Royal Opera House, British Museum, National Portrait Gallery and Royal Shakespeare Company. This followed the £10m, five-year deal it had made with Tate, the British Museum, the NPG and the Royal Opera House in 2011.
She added: “The RSC has understood that a climate emergency means that business as usual cannot continue, and we congratulate them for showing leadership.” But campaigners said it was now time for all major cultural institutions to follow the RCS’s lead and cut their ties with fossil fuel companies.
Worth urged other major cultural institutions such as the British Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Science Museum that still have links with fossil fuel companies to follow suit. “There is no longer any excuse for promoting a fossil fuel company in the middle of a climate crisis,”said Worth.
“There is no longer any excuse for promoting a fossil fuel company in the middle of a climate crisis.”
Royal Shakespeare CompanyRoyal Shakespeare Company
BPBP
Climate changeClimate change
Energy industryEnergy industry
OilOil
CommoditiesCommodities
Oil and gas companiesOil and gas companies
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content