This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/22/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
The Trump Impeachment Inquiry: Latest Updates The Trump Impeachment Inquiry: Latest Updates
(about 1 hour later)
William B. Taylor Jr., the United States ambassador to Ukraine, on Tuesday became the latest Trump administration official to make his way to Capitol Hill to offer his account to impeachment investigators as they search for answers about Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine. William B. Taylor Jr., the United States ambassador to Ukraine, on Tuesday became the latest Trump administration official to defy an administration blockade of the impeachment inquiry by going to Capitol Hill to offer his account to investigators as they search for answers about Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine.
Mr. Taylor is expected to be questioned about a series of text messages from September revealed by a former colleague, Kurt D. Volker, the former special envoy to Ukraine, in which Mr. Taylor wrote that he thought it was “crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”Mr. Taylor is expected to be questioned about a series of text messages from September revealed by a former colleague, Kurt D. Volker, the former special envoy to Ukraine, in which Mr. Taylor wrote that he thought it was “crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”
The exchange appeared to suggest that the Trump administration was trying to use a $319 million package of aid to Ukraine as leverage to squeeze the nation’s president to open investigations that would boost Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign — and that Mr. Taylor was alarmed by the effort. That exchange and others appeared to suggest that the Trump administration was trying to use a $391 million package of aid to Ukraine and the prospect of a White House meeting as leverage to squeeze the nation’s president to open investigations that would boost Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign — and that Mr. Taylor was alarmed by the efforts.
Democrats have argued that the mere suggestion by Mr. Trump that Ukraine investigate his political rivals is potentially impeachable conduct, calling it an abuse of power. But investigators are eager to uncover any evidence of an explicit quid pro quo, and Mr. Taylor could be crucial to filling out that picture.Democrats have argued that the mere suggestion by Mr. Trump that Ukraine investigate his political rivals is potentially impeachable conduct, calling it an abuse of power. But investigators are eager to uncover any evidence of an explicit quid pro quo, and Mr. Taylor could be crucial to filling out that picture.
The State Department tried to block Mr. Taylor from appearing for Tuesday’s deposition, or to limit his testimony if he did, according to an official working on the impeachment inquiry who insisted on anonymity to described the negotiations. Early Tuesday morning, in keeping with a pattern that has allowed investigators to extract crucial information from numerous administration witnesses, the House Intelligence Committee quietly issued a subpoena to compel Mr. Taylor to testify, and he complied.
— Nicholas Fandos
Mr. Trump took to Twitter early Tuesday to denounce the impeachment inquiry in ugly terms, describing it as a “lynching.”Mr. Trump took to Twitter early Tuesday to denounce the impeachment inquiry in ugly terms, describing it as a “lynching.”
It was the latest instance of the president, who has been complaining publicly that Republicans are not defending him strongly enough against the impeachment process, portraying himself as a victim being unfairly targeted.It was the latest instance of the president, who has been complaining publicly that Republicans are not defending him strongly enough against the impeachment process, portraying himself as a victim being unfairly targeted.
The posting, which sparked swift outrage among Democrats and particularly African Americans, was the second time in two days that the president had publicly disparaged a concept central to the Constitution. On Monday, Mr. Trump referred to the constitutional prohibition against a president profiting from foreign governments as the “phony Emoluments Clause.”The posting, which sparked swift outrage among Democrats and particularly African Americans, was the second time in two days that the president had publicly disparaged a concept central to the Constitution. On Monday, Mr. Trump referred to the constitutional prohibition against a president profiting from foreign governments as the “phony Emoluments Clause.”
Representative Bobby L. Rush, Democrat of Illinois, implored Mr. Trump to delete his Tuesday morning tweet, citing the ugly history of lynching in the United States. “Do you know how many people who look like me have been lynched, since the inception of this country, by people who look like you.” Representative Bobby L. Rush, Democrat of Illinois, implored Mr. Trump to delete his Tuesday morning tweet, citing the ugly history of lynching in the United States. “Do you know how many people who look like me have been lynched, since the inception of this country, by people who look like you,” Mr. Rush said on Twitter.
Some Republicans were also clearly uncomfortable with Mr. Trump’s words.
Representative Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California and the minority leader, denounced the impeachment inquiry and said it lacked due process, but said of the president’s tweet, “That’s not the language I would use.”
“I don’t agree with that language,” Mr. McCarthy added. “It’s pretty simple.”
President Trump repeatedly pressured President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to investigate people and issues of political concern to Mr. Trump, including former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Here’s a timeline of events since January.President Trump repeatedly pressured President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to investigate people and issues of political concern to Mr. Trump, including former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Here’s a timeline of events since January.
A C.I.A. officer who was once detailed to the White House filed a whistle-blower complaint on Mr. Trump’s interactions with Mr. Zelensky. Read the complaint.A C.I.A. officer who was once detailed to the White House filed a whistle-blower complaint on Mr. Trump’s interactions with Mr. Zelensky. Read the complaint.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced in September that the House would open a formal impeachment proceeding in response to the whistle-blower’s complaint. Here’s how the impeachment process works.Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced in September that the House would open a formal impeachment proceeding in response to the whistle-blower’s complaint. Here’s how the impeachment process works.
House committees have issued subpoenas to the White House, the Defense Department, the budget office and other agencies for documents related to the impeachment investigation. Here’s the evidence that has been collected so far.House committees have issued subpoenas to the White House, the Defense Department, the budget office and other agencies for documents related to the impeachment investigation. Here’s the evidence that has been collected so far.