This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/oct/24/harry-dunn-family-legal-action-against-the-foreign-office

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Harry Dunn family to begin legal action against the Foreign Office Harry Dunn family to begin legal action against Foreign Office
(32 minutes later)
The family of Harry Dunn will shortly issue a letter of claim to begin legal action against the Foreign Office, their spokesman has said.The family of Harry Dunn will shortly issue a letter of claim to begin legal action against the Foreign Office, their spokesman has said.
They have also referred Northamptonshire police to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) over the investigation into the death of their son, Radd Seiger said.They have also referred Northamptonshire police to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) over the investigation into the death of their son, Radd Seiger said.
After the Dunn family held a meeting with the human rights barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC, Seiger told Sky News: “It was a very detailed, thorough and lengthy meeting … The first action we will be taking is against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.” Dunn, 19, died after a collision outside RAF Croughton involving Anne Sacoolas, the wife of a US intelligence official who claimed diplomatic immunity and returned to her home country.
After the Dunn family held a meeting with the human rights barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC on Thursday, Seiger told Sky News: “It was a very detailed, thorough and lengthy meeting … The first action we will be taking is against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.”
The family would issue the letter as a prelude to seeking a judicial review.The family would issue the letter as a prelude to seeking a judicial review.
Seiger said: “We are absolutely clear that the Foreign Office’s decision to advise Northamptonshire police that Mrs [Anne] Sacoolas had the benefit of diplomatic immunity was unlawful and we will be seeking a judicial review of that decision to have it quashed.” Seiger said: “We are absolutely clear that the Foreign Office’s decision to advise Northamptonshire police that Mrs Sacoolas had the benefit of diplomatic immunity was unlawful and we will be seeking a judicial review of that decision to have it quashed.”
Northamptonshire police would also face legal action from the Dunn family following the force’s decision to travel to the US to interview Sacoolas.Northamptonshire police would also face legal action from the Dunn family following the force’s decision to travel to the US to interview Sacoolas.
Seiger said: “It’s absolutely clear that Mrs Sacoolas was involved in a very serious collision that ended in the loss of Harry’s life.Seiger said: “It’s absolutely clear that Mrs Sacoolas was involved in a very serious collision that ended in the loss of Harry’s life.
“We are clear she’s admitted her culpability, that she … committed a very serious crime that night. “We are clear she’s admitted her culpability, that she … committed a very serious crime that night. At the very least … causing death by careless driving and at the worst causing death by dangerous driving. She is a fugitive from this country and she is on the run.”
“At the very least … causing death by careless driving and at the worst causing death by dangerous driving. She is a fugitive from this country and she is on the run.”
Seiger said the family would continue to appeal for Sacoolas to return to the UK.Seiger said the family would continue to appeal for Sacoolas to return to the UK.
The Dunn family’s spokesman also questioned if Sacoolas was entitled to diplomatic immunity through her husband, saying: “This person, whoever he is, was not a diplomat and therefore does not have the benefit of diplomatic immunity and nor does his family.”The Dunn family’s spokesman also questioned if Sacoolas was entitled to diplomatic immunity through her husband, saying: “This person, whoever he is, was not a diplomat and therefore does not have the benefit of diplomatic immunity and nor does his family.”
Seiger said the family planned to refer Northamptonshire police to the IOPC.Seiger said the family planned to refer Northamptonshire police to the IOPC.
He said that although the force “have not disclosed all the information this family are entitled to, we have deep concerns about the manner in which this investigation was conducted, and simply adds insult to injury to this family at their darkest hour.”He said that although the force “have not disclosed all the information this family are entitled to, we have deep concerns about the manner in which this investigation was conducted, and simply adds insult to injury to this family at their darkest hour.”
UK news Police
Foreign policyForeign policy
Crime
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content