This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Democrats’ Rules Approved for Impeachment Inquiry: Live Updates Democrats’ Rules Approved for Impeachment Inquiry: Live Updates
(about 3 hours later)
The vote was on a resolution that sets rules for the public phase of an impeachment inquiry that has so far been conducted exclusively behind closed doors. The final tally was 232-196, largely along party lines.The vote was on a resolution that sets rules for the public phase of an impeachment inquiry that has so far been conducted exclusively behind closed doors. The final tally was 232-196, largely along party lines.
It authorized the House Intelligence Committee — the panel that has been leading the investigation and conducting private depositions — to convene public hearings and produce a report that will guide the Judiciary Committee as it considers whether to draft articles of impeachment against President Trump.It authorized the House Intelligence Committee — the panel that has been leading the investigation and conducting private depositions — to convene public hearings and produce a report that will guide the Judiciary Committee as it considers whether to draft articles of impeachment against President Trump.
The measure also gives the president rights in the Judiciary Committee, allowing his lawyers to participate in hearings and giving Republicans the chance to request subpoenas for witnesses and documents. But the White House says it does not provide “basic due process rights,” and Republicans complain that their ability to issue subpoenas is limited. They will need the consent of Democrats, or a vote of a majority of members. That has been standard in previous modern impeachments. The majority has the final say over how the proceedings unfold.The measure also gives the president rights in the Judiciary Committee, allowing his lawyers to participate in hearings and giving Republicans the chance to request subpoenas for witnesses and documents. But the White House says it does not provide “basic due process rights,” and Republicans complain that their ability to issue subpoenas is limited. They will need the consent of Democrats, or a vote of a majority of members. That has been standard in previous modern impeachments. The majority has the final say over how the proceedings unfold.
Immediately after the vote, President Trump again attacked the inquiry on Twitter.Immediately after the vote, President Trump again attacked the inquiry on Twitter.
In a statement, the White House press secretary also attacked the inquiry and the Democratic leader, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, calling it “unhinged obsession” of her party.In a statement, the White House press secretary also attacked the inquiry and the Democratic leader, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, calling it “unhinged obsession” of her party.
“The president has done nothing wrong, and the Democrats know it,” the press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, said.“The president has done nothing wrong, and the Democrats know it,” the press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, said.
The witness, Timothy Morrison, the former top Russia expert for the National Security Council, appeared under subpoena despite a White House directive not to, according to an official involved in the inquiry. He is the second current white House official to testify before the inquiry this week, following Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman.
Little was known about what Mr. Morrison intends to say. Other witnesses have said he informed them about efforts by Mr. Trump and his ambassador to the European Union, Gordon D. Sondland, made clear to the Ukrainians that they expected a public pledge for certain politically advantageous investigations before the security assistance would be released. The witness, Timothy Morrison, the former top Russia expert for the National Security Council, testified Thursday that a top diplomat who was close to President Trump told him that a package of military assistance for Ukraine would not be released until the country committed to investigating Mr. Trump’s political rivals, corroborating a key episode at the center of the impeachment inquiry.
Mr. Morrison’s testimony backed up details provided last week by Ambassador William B. Taylor Jr., the top American diplomat in Ukraine, during his private testimony.
In his opening remarks, which were reviewed by The New York Times, Mr. Morrison resisted drawing conclusions about Mr. Trump’s involvement, and in subsequent testimony he made clear he did not view the actions of the president or others involved as illegal or improper. Instead, he characterized their behavior as bad foreign policy of the sort that could potentially squander a “once-in-a-generation opportunity” afforded by the election of Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
Mr. Morrison appeared under subpoena despite a White House directive not to, according to an official involved in the inquiry. He is the second current white House official to testify before the inquiry this week, following Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman.
Mr. Morrison resigned his post at the National Security Council on Thursday ahead of the testimony, though he had been weighing leaving for some time, according to another official familiar with the matter.Mr. Morrison resigned his post at the National Security Council on Thursday ahead of the testimony, though he had been weighing leaving for some time, according to another official familiar with the matter.
In a rare gesture, Speaker Nancy Pelosi presided over the House chamber as the text of the procedures and the resolution outlining the public stage of the inquiry was read into the Congressional Record.In a rare gesture, Speaker Nancy Pelosi presided over the House chamber as the text of the procedures and the resolution outlining the public stage of the inquiry was read into the Congressional Record.
Standing next to a poster of the American flag, Ms. Pelosi repeatedly evoked the tenets of the Constitution as she framed the vote as an act of transparency as lawmakers investigate whether Mr. Trump abused his office in pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political rival.Standing next to a poster of the American flag, Ms. Pelosi repeatedly evoked the tenets of the Constitution as she framed the vote as an act of transparency as lawmakers investigate whether Mr. Trump abused his office in pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political rival.
“That is really what this vote is about,” Ms. Pelosi said. “It is about the truth.”“That is really what this vote is about,” Ms. Pelosi said. “It is about the truth.”
After she concluded her remarks, the dozens of Democrats already gathered in the chamber broke into applause.After she concluded her remarks, the dozens of Democrats already gathered in the chamber broke into applause.
Republican lawmakers continued to argue that under the procedures and the resolution outlined by House Democrats, Mr. Trump would not have the opportunity to sufficiently defend himself against the allegations.Republican lawmakers continued to argue that under the procedures and the resolution outlined by House Democrats, Mr. Trump would not have the opportunity to sufficiently defend himself against the allegations.
At a news conference early Thursday morning, Ms. Pelosi dismissed questions about Republican concerns, saying that “these rules are fairer than anything that have gone before in terms of an impeachment proceeding.”— Emily CochraneAt a news conference early Thursday morning, Ms. Pelosi dismissed questions about Republican concerns, saying that “these rules are fairer than anything that have gone before in terms of an impeachment proceeding.”— Emily Cochrane
Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the Republican whip, emerged from the House floor triumphant that not a single member of his party broke ranks to support the House Democrats’ resolution.Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the Republican whip, emerged from the House floor triumphant that not a single member of his party broke ranks to support the House Democrats’ resolution.
“There were a lot of questions today about whether or not Republicans would stick together on this vote and do the right thing for the country,” Mr. Scalise said. “I can tell you that our conference stood strong.”“There were a lot of questions today about whether or not Republicans would stick together on this vote and do the right thing for the country,” Mr. Scalise said. “I can tell you that our conference stood strong.”
In a victory lap in the speaker’s lobby, Mr. Scalise noted that two Democrats opposed the resolution.In a victory lap in the speaker’s lobby, Mr. Scalise noted that two Democrats opposed the resolution.
“Nancy Pelosi, at the beginning of this Congress, said if there’s going to be impeachment it has to be bipartisan,” he said. “In fact the only bipartisan vote today was against impeachment.”— Catie Edmondson“Nancy Pelosi, at the beginning of this Congress, said if there’s going to be impeachment it has to be bipartisan,” he said. “In fact the only bipartisan vote today was against impeachment.”— Catie Edmondson
Republicans are already making hay of the fact that their side was the only one to stay united in today’s House vote. Two Democrats broke ranks to vote against a resolution endorsing an impeachment inquiry into President Trump.Republicans are already making hay of the fact that their side was the only one to stay united in today’s House vote. Two Democrats broke ranks to vote against a resolution endorsing an impeachment inquiry into President Trump.
But 21 years ago, a much larger defection on a similar vote was viewed differently. Back in 1998, the Republican-led House voted 258 to 176 to initiate an impeachment inquiry into President Bill Clinton.But 21 years ago, a much larger defection on a similar vote was viewed differently. Back in 1998, the Republican-led House voted 258 to 176 to initiate an impeachment inquiry into President Bill Clinton.
As an article in The New York Times noted at the time: “The quarreling on the House floor was plainly partisan. So was the subsequent vote of 258 to 176, as only 31 of the 206 House Democrats joined the Republican majority and signed on to the resolution for an open-ended impeachment inquiry.”As an article in The New York Times noted at the time: “The quarreling on the House floor was plainly partisan. So was the subsequent vote of 258 to 176, as only 31 of the 206 House Democrats joined the Republican majority and signed on to the resolution for an open-ended impeachment inquiry.”
The story described White House officials as “heartened that not enough Democrats defected to make the vote appear bipartisan.”The story described White House officials as “heartened that not enough Democrats defected to make the vote appear bipartisan.”
A CNN article on the vote at the time also described Democrats as “pleased only 15 percent of their caucus broke ranks.”A CNN article on the vote at the time also described Democrats as “pleased only 15 percent of their caucus broke ranks.”
Several Democrats seeking the party’s nomination for president in 2020 uniformly praised the House vote to endorse an impeachment inquiry and urged Congress to continue with the process.Several Democrats seeking the party’s nomination for president in 2020 uniformly praised the House vote to endorse an impeachment inquiry and urged Congress to continue with the process.
Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey tweeted that he was “proud of House Democrats” for approving the resolution; former Representative Beto O’Rourke of Texas called it a “good step” but “only the beginning.” And Senator Kamala Harris of California issued what she called a well-timed “reminder” that “no one is above the law, including the president of the United States.”Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey tweeted that he was “proud of House Democrats” for approving the resolution; former Representative Beto O’Rourke of Texas called it a “good step” but “only the beginning.” And Senator Kamala Harris of California issued what she called a well-timed “reminder” that “no one is above the law, including the president of the United States.”
“This president took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution,” said Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind. “So did every member of Congress. This president violated that oath, betraying our country and leaving our representatives with no choice but to uphold their own. Congress must move forward with impeachment.”“This president took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution,” said Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind. “So did every member of Congress. This president violated that oath, betraying our country and leaving our representatives with no choice but to uphold their own. Congress must move forward with impeachment.”
In a statement, Tom Steyer, the billionaire and former hedge fund manager who has supported impeachment for more than two years, called Thursday’s vote a “significant step forward” but resisted taking a victory lap. In a statement, Tom Steyer, the billionaire and former hedge fund manager who has supported impeachment for more than two years, called Thursday’s vote a “significant step forward.”
“I am confident that holding public hearings and showing the people the facts will force Republicans to listen to their constituents and vote to remove Donald Trump from office,” he said. “Only then will we be able to restore our confidence in Congress and move our country forward together.”— Matt Stevens Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. said in a statement Thursday that Mr. Trump had “weaponized the institutions of our government for political purposes, subverting our national security for his own political gain.” Mr. Biden has a personal connection to the events that helped trigger the impeachment inquiry: Mr. Trump asked the government of Ukraine to investigate the Biden family.
“Today, the House did its constitutional duty to proceed with a solemn investigation of unprecedented wrongdoing,” Mr. Biden said. “Members of Congress take an oath of loyalty to the Constitution when they are sworn in, not an oath to their party or to the president. Congress must do its duty to ensure that Donald Trump’s assault on the Constitution does not seep beyond his presidency, with a lasting and devastating impact on our democracy.”— Matt Stevens and Katie Glueck
Mr. Trump repeatedly pressured President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to investigate people and issues of political concern to Mr. Trump, including former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Here’s a timeline of events since January.Mr. Trump repeatedly pressured President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to investigate people and issues of political concern to Mr. Trump, including former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Here’s a timeline of events since January.
A C.I.A. officer who was once detailed to the White House filed a whistle-blower complaint on Mr. Trump’s interactions with Mr. Zelensky. Read the complaint.A C.I.A. officer who was once detailed to the White House filed a whistle-blower complaint on Mr. Trump’s interactions with Mr. Zelensky. Read the complaint.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced in September that the House would open a formal impeachment proceeding in response to the whistle-blower’s complaint. Here’s how the impeachment process works and here’s why political influence in foreign policy matters.Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced in September that the House would open a formal impeachment proceeding in response to the whistle-blower’s complaint. Here’s how the impeachment process works and here’s why political influence in foreign policy matters.
House committees have issued subpoenas to the White House, the Defense Department, the budget office and other agencies for documents related to the impeachment investigation. Here’s the evidence that has been collected so far.House committees have issued subpoenas to the White House, the Defense Department, the budget office and other agencies for documents related to the impeachment investigation. Here’s the evidence that has been collected so far.
Read about the Democrats’ rules to govern impeachment proceedings.Read about the Democrats’ rules to govern impeachment proceedings.