This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50249649

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
General election 2019: What is tactical voting? General election 2019: How do election pacts and tactical voting work?
(6 days later)
The result of the 2019 general election could determine whether Brexit happens or not.The result of the 2019 general election could determine whether Brexit happens or not.
Some campaign groups are suggesting people use tactical-voting websites, to help them decide which candidate to support. One website has faced criticism over the nature of its advice. Some parties have withdrawn candidates to help their rivals. Meanwhile, campaign groups are encouraging people to use tactical-voting websites, to help them decide which candidate to support.
But what is tactical voting and is there any evidence it works? So, what are election pacts and tactical voting - and how does each work?
Why do parties withdraw their own candidates?
Parties and candidates themselves sometimes make tactical decisions.
This generally means one party agreeing not to stand candidates in certain areas, so that another party with similar views on key issues has a stronger change of winning.
The aim is to stop the vote splitting, which could help rivals with very different views from taking the seat.
In Canterbury, Liberal Democrat candidate Tim Walker has stood down because he feared dividing the Remain vote. He said he was concerned standing would allow the Conservative candidate to take the seat from Labour.
And the Brexit Party has announced it will not contest the 317 seats won by the Conservatives in 2017. This is so as not to split the pro-Brexit vote in those areas. Instead, it says it will concentrate its efforts on taking seats from Labour, whom it suggested had "betrayed" its Leave-supporting voters.
The Green Party has stood down its candidate in Chingford and Woodford Green, to help Labour try to unseat former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith.
Separately, anti-Brexit parties Plaid Cymru, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens have agreed an electoral pact in 11 of the 40 seats in Wales. The aim is to get as many Remain-supporting MPs elected as possible.
Back in August, the Lib Dems beat the Conservatives in the Brecon and Radnorshire by-election, after Plaid Cymru and the Greens agreed not to stand.
Labour has ruled out forming pacts with other parties.
What is tactical voting?What is tactical voting?
Put simply, tactical voting is when someone backs a candidate they wouldn't normally support, to stop someone else winning. Put simply, tactical voting is when any of the UK's voters chooses to back a candidate they wouldn't normally support. This is done in the hope of stopping another candidate winning.
This could happen in a constituency where two parties are in a tight race and candidates from other parties trail far behind.This could happen in a constituency where two parties are in a tight race and candidates from other parties trail far behind.
In these circumstances, a supporter of the candidate who was a distant third, might pick their favourite of the two who are in with a chance.In these circumstances, a supporter of the candidate who was a distant third, might pick their favourite of the two who are in with a chance.
At this election, campaigners say voting tactically could help MPs who share voters' views on Brexit win more seats.At this election, campaigners say voting tactically could help MPs who share voters' views on Brexit win more seats.
Why would tactical voting matter in the UK? A number of tactical voting websites have been set up, but there is criticism over the nature of their advice.
In a general election, the UK's 46 million voters are invited to choose an MP for their area - one of 650 constituencies. Why would tactical voting and election pacts matter in the UK?
In a general election, the UK's voters are invited to choose an MP for their area - one of 650 constituencies.
The UK uses a first-past-the-post voting system, sometimes described as "winner takes all".The UK uses a first-past-the-post voting system, sometimes described as "winner takes all".
It means the local candidate who receives the most votes becomes an MP - and the party with the most winning candidates nationally normally forms a government.It means the local candidate who receives the most votes becomes an MP - and the party with the most winning candidates nationally normally forms a government.
Am I allowed to vote tactically? Coming a good second does not help a party win any more power in Parliament.
Tactical voting is perfectly legal in the UK. Voters are free to choose any candidate on the ballot paper, no matter what the reason is.Tactical voting is perfectly legal in the UK. Voters are free to choose any candidate on the ballot paper, no matter what the reason is.
Parties themselves sometimes make tactical decisions not to stand in certain seats.
This is to prevent the vote splitting, which could prevent another party with similar political views being elected.
In August, for example, the Liberal Democrats beat the Conservatives in the Brecon and Radnorshire by-election, after Plaid Cymru and the Greens agreed not to stand.
At this election, the Brexit Party has said it could be open to an electoral pact with the Conservatives. It believes this could increase the chances of a Brexit-supporting government winning power.
The general election explainedThe general election explained
Will tactical voting increase at this election?Will tactical voting increase at this election?
This election is going to be highly unpredictable, researchers at the British Election Study say.This election is going to be highly unpredictable, researchers at the British Election Study say.
That's because voters could be more likely to switch their support, largely because of the uncertainty over Brexit.That's because voters could be more likely to switch their support, largely because of the uncertainty over Brexit.
Last month, the Electoral Reform Society campaign group asked polling company BMG Research to find out how widespread tactical voting might be.Last month, the Electoral Reform Society campaign group asked polling company BMG Research to find out how widespread tactical voting might be.
Of 1,500 voters questioned, 24% said they planned to vote tactically to keep out a candidate they dislike.Of 1,500 voters questioned, 24% said they planned to vote tactically to keep out a candidate they dislike.
That compares with 66% who said they would vote for their first preference - regardless of how likely they were to win. The remaining 10% said they didn't know.That compares with 66% who said they would vote for their first preference - regardless of how likely they were to win. The remaining 10% said they didn't know.
When the same question was asked before the 2017 general election, 20% of people said they planned to vote tactically.When the same question was asked before the 2017 general election, 20% of people said they planned to vote tactically.
What are the parties doing about tactical voting?
Anti-Brexit parties the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and the Green Party have formed an electoral pact.
They have agreed not to stand against each other in dozens of seats to boost the remaining candidate's chances of victory.
In Welsh seats, two of the three will stand down to allow the third a clear run at attracting Remain voters, while in the rest of the UK one of the Lib Dems and Greens will make way for the other.
All three parties support another Brexit referendum and want the UK to remain in the EU.
However, the Conservatives have rejected the offer of a similar pact with the Brexit Party.
And Labour have also ruled out forming pacts with other parties.
Is there any evidence tactical voting works?Is there any evidence tactical voting works?
Tactical voting has been a very powerful tool in the past, says Stephen Fisher, professor of political sociology at the University of Oxford.Tactical voting has been a very powerful tool in the past, says Stephen Fisher, professor of political sociology at the University of Oxford.
"It played a big role in delivering a landslide for Labour's Tony Blair in 1997 and it's been a staple of elections since then," he says."It played a big role in delivering a landslide for Labour's Tony Blair in 1997 and it's been a staple of elections since then," he says.