This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/13/trump-impeachment-inquiry-public-hearings-democrats-republicans

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
‘Historic task’: Democrats aim to prove Trump's actions warrant impeachment Trump cared more about investigating Biden than Ukraine, key witness reveals
(about 3 hours later)
The House begins public hearings against the president – who has struggled furiously to prevent the investigationThe House begins public hearings against the president – who has struggled furiously to prevent the investigation
With less than a year until Donald Trump faces re-election, the House of Representatives began public hearings on Wednesday into alleged misconduct by the president that Democrats and some Republicans say could warrant his impeachment. Donald Trump cared more about investigating his political rival Joe Biden than the fate of Ukraine, according to dramatic testimony from a key witness in the first impeachment inquiry hearing before the American public.
It is a day that Trump has struggled furiously to prevent, blocking witnesses, attacking investigators and throwing up a social media smokescreen. Less than a year before the president faces re-election, the House of Representatives began public hearings on Wednesday into allegations that Trump abused the power of his office.
As Democratic chair Adam Schiff gaveled the House intelligence committee to order, cameras from every major network carried the proceedings to millions of Americans, some of whom will be encountering the allegations against Trump for the first time. As Adam Schiff, the Democratic chair, gaveled the House intelligence committee into session, cameras from every major network carried the proceedings to millions of Americans, some of whom were encountering the allegations against Trump for the first time.
Trump has denied any wrongdoing. Now, the country will decide. In an opening statement, Schiff said the hearings would explore whether Trump sought to exploit Ukraine’s vulnerability, condition White House acts on Ukraine’s willingness to help his re-election, and “whether such an abuse of his power is compatible with the presidency.”.
In an opening statement, Schiff said the hearings would explore whether Trump sought to exploit Ukraine’s vulnerability, condition White House acts on Ukraine’s willingness to help his reelection, and “whether such an abuse of his power is compatible with the presidency.” “The matter is as simple and as terrible as that,” Schiff said. “Our answer to these questions will affect not only the future of this presidency but the future of the presidency itself.”
“The matter is as simple and as terrible as that,” Schiff said. “Our answer to these questions will affect not only the future of this presidency but the future of the presidency itself. Trump filled his Twitter account on Wednesday morning with video clips of his defenders attacking the proceedings. But in the hearing room, new testimony tied Trump directly to a plot to condition US military aid and a White House visit on a Ukrainian announcement of the Biden investigation.
“Is this what Americans should now expect from their president? If this is not impeachable conduct, what is?” Bill Taylor, acting US ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, state department deputy assistant secretary, were the first witnesses to be called. Taylor said one of his aides had heard Gordon Sondland, US ambassador to the EU, talking to Trump on the phone in July.
In response, senior Republican on the committee Devin Nunes declared the proceedings “a carefully orchestrated media smear campaign” and a “horrifically one-sided process.” “Following the phone call with president Trump, the member of my staff asked Ambassador Sondland what president Trump thought about Ukraine,” Taylor said. “Ambassador Sondland responded that Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, which [Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy] Giuliani was pressing for.”
“It’s nothing more than an impeachment process in search of a crime.” The opening of the public impeachment hearings was a day Trump has struggled furiously to prevent, blocking witnesses, attacking investigators and throwing up a social media smokescreen. Trump has claimed his push for investigations in Ukraine arose from his concern about corruption in the country.
The opening statements reflected the broader messaging battle that has surrounded the impeachment proceedings since they were announced in late September, with Democrats accusing Trump of corruption and Republicans accusing Democrats of running an unfair process. “I’m too busy to watch it,” Trump told reporters about the hearings. “It’s a witch-hunt, it’s a hoax, I’m too busy to watch it. So, I’m sure I’ll get a report. There’s nothing – I have not been briefed. There’s nothing there.”
The White House press secretary tweeted that the hearings were “boring”.
In response to Schiff’s opening statement, Devin Nunes, the senior Republican on the committee, declared the proceedings “a carefully orchestrated media smear campaign” and a “low-rent Ukrainian sequel” to previous committee hearings about alleged collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.
“It’s nothing more than an impeachment process in search of a crime,” Nunes said.
The Schiff and Nunes statements reflected the broader messaging battle that has surrounded the impeachment proceedings since they were announced in late September, with Democrats accusing Trump of corruption and Republicans accusing Democrats of running an unfair process.
Three Republicans interrupted the proceedings just as the witnesses were to begin testifying with demands that the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint launched the impeachment inquiry be called to testify. Schiff rebuffed the demands.Three Republicans interrupted the proceedings just as the witnesses were to begin testifying with demands that the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint launched the impeachment inquiry be called to testify. Schiff rebuffed the demands.
“I am not here to take one side or the other, or to advocate for any particular outcome of these proceedings” said Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador in Kyiv, who testified Wednesday alongside state department deputy assistant secretary George Kent. “My purpose is to provide the facts as I know them.” “I am not here to take one side or the other, or to advocate for any particular outcome of these proceedings,” said Taylor. “My purpose is to provide the facts as I know them.”
Taylor described his concern to discover, last spring, an informal policy channel in Ukraine led by Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and advanced by US officials close to the White House, including Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union. Taylor described his concern to discover, last spring, an informal policy channel in Ukraine led by Giuliani, and advanced by US officials close to the White House, including Sondland.
Sondland told Taylor that “everything” – military aid and a White House meeting for Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy – depended on Zelesnkiy’s willingness to announce an investigation of Joe Biden, Trump’s political rival, Taylor testified. Sondland told Taylor that “everything” – military aid and a White House meeting for Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy – depended on Zelesnkiy’s willingness to announce an investigation of Biden, Trump’s political rival, Taylor testified.
In a scene that did not appear in his previous closed-door deposition, Taylor said one of his aides overheard Trump on a cell phone call “asking ambassador Sondland about the investigations” during a Sondland visit to Ukraine in July. With a half-century of foreign service experience between them, the witnesses described a US policy of supporting Ukraine as a frontline state against what they said was a Russian assault on the “rules-based order” in eastern Europe. For the newly elected Zelenskiy, Kent testified, a White House meeting would be crucial.
“Following the phone call with president Trump, the member of my staff asked ambassador Sondland what president Trump thought about Ukraine,” Taylor said. “Ambassador Sondland responded that Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, which Giuliani was pressing for.” “A meeting with the US president in the Oval Office at the White House” would be seen, said Kent, “as the ultimate sign of endorsement and support from the United States”.
Democrats allege Trump abused the power of his office by withholding military aid and dangling a White House visit in an effort to force Ukraine to announce sham investigations of Biden. Republicans say Trump had good reasons for stalling aid and acted within his power to do so. The US demand that Ukraine pursue politically-motivated investigations, and the withholding of aide for Ukraine, undermined US efforts to promote the rule of law and threatened to give Russia a free hand in the region, the diplomats testified.
“It is a very momentous occasion,” said Richard Briffault, an impeachment expert and professor at Columbia law school, said of the opening of the public impeachment hearings. “This will only be the fourth time in more than 225 years that Congress has considered the impeachment of a president.” Taylor was asked what he meant when he said in a text message obtained by the committee that withholding security assistance for Ukraine to help a political campaign was “crazy”.
Democrats have a two-part case to make, Briffault said: “One part is about the facts. It doesn’t sound like the president is really contesting a lot of the facts anymore, although we’ll find out as that goes forward. “To withhold that assistance for no good reason other than to help with a political campaign made no sense,” Taylor said. “It was counterproductive. It was illogical, it could not be explained, it was crazy.”
Richard Briffault, an impeachment expert and professor at Columbia Law School, said of the opening of the public impeachment hearings was “a very moment occasion”, adding: “This will only be the fourth time in more than 225 years that Congress has considered the impeachment of a president.”
In the public hearings, which will continue for two weeks, Democrats have a two-part case to make, Briffault said: “One part is about the facts. It doesn’t sound like the president is really contesting a lot of the facts anymore, although we’ll find out as that goes forward.
“But the harder part, I think, is saying that this is serious enough that it justifies removal from office.”“But the harder part, I think, is saying that this is serious enough that it justifies removal from office.”
Corey Brettschneider, the author of The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents and a professor of constitutional law at Brown University, said that while the president has broad powers to exercise foreign policy, those powers do not include exercising foreign policy for his own personal benefit.Corey Brettschneider, the author of The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents and a professor of constitutional law at Brown University, said that while the president has broad powers to exercise foreign policy, those powers do not include exercising foreign policy for his own personal benefit.
“When it comes to impeachment, the framers dedicated a significant amount of time to thinking about this,” Brettschneider said. “They made a deliberate decision to say ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’, emphasizing that if the president abused power – not just committed a crime – then he or she would be removed.”“When it comes to impeachment, the framers dedicated a significant amount of time to thinking about this,” Brettschneider said. “They made a deliberate decision to say ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’, emphasizing that if the president abused power – not just committed a crime – then he or she would be removed.”
In a nod to the gravity of the moment, Schiff instructed colleagues in a letter on Tuesday to be “mindful of the solemn and historic task before us”.
The Democrats plan to call nine additional witnesses in the space of eight days, including almost everyone they have deposed behind closed doors, with the last public testimony currently scheduled for next Thursday.The Democrats plan to call nine additional witnesses in the space of eight days, including almost everyone they have deposed behind closed doors, with the last public testimony currently scheduled for next Thursday.
Public impeachment hearings are expected to last about two weeks, until the Thanksgiving holiday break. Upon conclusion of its work, the intelligence committee is to submit a report to the judiciary committee, which then could draw up and vote on articles of impeachment.Public impeachment hearings are expected to last about two weeks, until the Thanksgiving holiday break. Upon conclusion of its work, the intelligence committee is to submit a report to the judiciary committee, which then could draw up and vote on articles of impeachment.
The full House could proceed to a vote on the impeachment of Trump by the end of the year.The full House could proceed to a vote on the impeachment of Trump by the end of the year.