This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/15/chile-referendum-new-constitution-protests

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Chilean lawmakers agree to referendum on new constitution Chilean lawmakers agree to referendum on new constitution
(about 5 hours later)
Vote in April on whether to rewrite document and how after scrapping of Pinochet-era constitution emerged as protesters’ key demandVote in April on whether to rewrite document and how after scrapping of Pinochet-era constitution emerged as protesters’ key demand
Lawmakers in Chile have agreed hold a referendum next April on replacing the Pinochet-era constitution, bowing to demands of protesters who want the country’s social and economic model overhauled. Chilean political parties have agreed to a referendum on replacing the country’s Pinochet-era constitution, in a deal which could help end nearly a month of sometimes violent political unrest.
Voters will be asked whether they approve the idea of a new constitution and whether current lawmakers should serve on the commission that would redraft the document. The country has been rocked by weeks of demonstrations which began over subway fares and quickly grew into a broader protest over economic inequality and political exclusion.
The two-page “Agreement for Peace and a New Constitution”, signed early on Friday following intense negotiations, calls for a “commitment to re-establish peace and public order in Chile”. Much of the protestors’ anger has focused on Chile’s 1980 constitution, which is seen as the embodiment of Augusto Pinochet’s neoliberal model, prioritizing a market-driven economy but failing to adequately guarantee healthcare, education and pensions.
A month of protests has sowed chaos in the South American nation. Riots, arson and looting have killed more than 20 people, caused extensive damage and prompted President Sebastián Piñera to call soldiers on to the streets. The Chilean peso this week plunged to a new low against the dollar. After an agreement hammered out in congress early on Friday, a nationwide plebiscite in April will ask Chileans if they want a new constitution – and how it will be drafted.
Though protesters lack a clear leader or spokesperson, a new constitution emerged quickly as an important demand. Critics say Chile’s existing Magna Carta, written and approved during General Augusto Pinochet’s 1973-90 military dictatorship, lacks legitimacy. Once the draft is complete, the new constitution will be submitted to a second, compulsory referendum for ratification.
Lawmakers revised the original 1980 document after Chile returned to democracy but many say it still falls short, failing to ensure for proper healthcare, education and citizen participation in government. Interior minister Gonzalo Blumel said: “This agreement is a first step, but it is a historic and fundamental first step to start building our new social pact, and in this the citizenry will have a leading role.”
Opponents of an overhaul say the charter has been a pillar of stability for Chile, among the region’s strongest and most investor-friendly economies. The deal represents a major concession from president Sebastián Piñera, who had previously rejected the idea of a constitutional assembly in favour of drafting a new framework in congress.
The details will be worked out by a constitutional convention whose composition will be determined in the April referendum. A second vote, in October 2020, will allow voters to select those who will finally serve on the convention. But pressure on Piñera rose this week after a string of arson attacks on landmark buildings and speculation that the army could be called back on to the streets.
A final vote on the draft itself will be obligatory for all voting age Chileans, according to the agreement. In response, the Chilean government finally warmed to a political compromise, inviting party leaders to discuss protesters’ demands.
“Overall, this is a good agreement because it represents political consensus and we had reached a dead end,” said Cristóbal Bellolio, a politics professor at Adolfo Ibañez University in Santiago.
“It means that for the first time in our history we will have a constitution that belongs to all of us, which is the product of a true democratic process – not drafted by a group of six or seven experts and given to us by a dictator,” he said.
The latest poll from Cadem asserted that 78% of Chileans wanted a new constitution, while a constitutional assembly was the most popular mechanism through which to achieve this.
“The constitution of the dictatorship has died,” progressive senator and former foreign minister Heraldo Muñoz said after Friday’s vote.
Although full details of how the process will work remain unclear, Catalina Pérez, the leader of the Revolución Democrática party and one of the document’s 10 signatories, described it as a watershed moment for Chile.
“After more than 25 days of protests, the government was left with no option but to transfer power to the people – this is just the beginning of a fundamental change towards a more equal society,” she told AFP.
Protesters who had gathered in Santiago’s Plaza Italia on Friday morning suggested that the deal was a step in the right direction, but remained unconvinced by some of the details.
“Of course it’s an historic moment, but it’s just not enough,” said small business owner Enrique Cisterna, who expressed concern that reforms could still be hobbled by a requirement that every article in the new constitution will require approval by a two-thirds majority in congress.
Close by, 74-year-old retiree Juan Manuel Lanata held a hand-painted sign underlining his disappointment with the agreement.
“I believe that it is my duty to come here to register my dissent,” he said. “The two-thirds requirement is absurd – it’s a betrayal of the people! These protests will continue because this deal is not enough.”