This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7800846.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Website age ratings 'an option' Website age ratings 'an option'
(about 5 hours later)
Film-style age ratings could be applied to websites to protect children from harmful and offensive material, Culture Secretary Andy Burnham has said.Film-style age ratings could be applied to websites to protect children from harmful and offensive material, Culture Secretary Andy Burnham has said.
Mr Burnham told the Daily Telegraph the government was looking at a number of possible new internet safeguards.Mr Burnham told the Daily Telegraph the government was looking at a number of possible new internet safeguards.
He said some content, such as clips of beheadings, was unacceptable and new standards of decency were needed.He said some content, such as clips of beheadings, was unacceptable and new standards of decency were needed.
He also plans to negotiate with the US on drawing up international rules for English language websites.He also plans to negotiate with the US on drawing up international rules for English language websites.
Mr Burnham, a father of three young children, believes internet-service providers should offer child-friendly web access.Mr Burnham, a father of three young children, believes internet-service providers should offer child-friendly web access.
'Public interest''Public interest'
"Leaving your child for two hours completely unregulated on the internet is not something you can do," he told the Telegraph. This is not a campaign against free speech... it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake Andy Burnham, Culture Secretary"Leaving your child for two hours completely unregulated on the internet is not something you can do," he told the Telegraph. This is not a campaign against free speech... it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake Andy Burnham, Culture Secretary
"This isn't about turning back the clock. The internet has been empowering and democratising in many ways, but we haven't yet got the stakes in the ground to help people navigate their way safely around it.""This isn't about turning back the clock. The internet has been empowering and democratising in many ways, but we haven't yet got the stakes in the ground to help people navigate their way safely around it."
He went on to say it was time to review the accessibility of certain content on the internet and insisted he was not trying to curb free speech.He went on to say it was time to review the accessibility of certain content on the internet and insisted he was not trying to curb free speech.
His plans are likely to anger those who advocate the freedom of the worldwide web.His plans are likely to anger those who advocate the freedom of the worldwide web.
"You can still view content on the internet which I would say is unacceptable. You can view a beheading," he said."You can still view content on the internet which I would say is unacceptable. You can view a beheading," he said.
HAVE YOUR SAYThis suggestion has obviously been made by somebody who knows nothing about how the internet worksBrendan, Birmingham, UKSend us your comments
"This is not a campaign against free speech, far from it, it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake when it involves harm to other people.""This is not a campaign against free speech, far from it, it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake when it involves harm to other people."
On the issue of giving individual websites film-style classifications, Mr Burnham said: "That would be an option. This is an area that is really now coming into full focus."On the issue of giving individual websites film-style classifications, Mr Burnham said: "That would be an option. This is an area that is really now coming into full focus."
Licence feeLicence fee
In Saturday's wide-ranging newspaper interview, Mr Burnham also suggested he would allocate money raised from the BBC's commercial activities to fund other broadcasters, such as Channel Four.In Saturday's wide-ranging newspaper interview, Mr Burnham also suggested he would allocate money raised from the BBC's commercial activities to fund other broadcasters, such as Channel Four.
On the future of the licence fee, he said: "Top-slicing the licence fee [to fund other broadcasters] is an option that is going to have to remain on the table."On the future of the licence fee, he said: "Top-slicing the licence fee [to fund other broadcasters] is an option that is going to have to remain on the table."
But he added: ''I have to say it is not the option that I instinctively reach for first. I think there are other avenues to be explored."But he added: ''I have to say it is not the option that I instinctively reach for first. I think there are other avenues to be explored."
Concerns over children's safety on the internet have already led to calls from the NSPCC for computer manufacturers and retailers to install security to stop children finding violent or sexual content.Concerns over children's safety on the internet have already led to calls from the NSPCC for computer manufacturers and retailers to install security to stop children finding violent or sexual content.
A poll carried out by the children's charity in October suggested three out of four children had been disturbed by images they had seen on the internet.A poll carried out by the children's charity in October suggested three out of four children had been disturbed by images they had seen on the internet.
In July this year, the Commons culture, media and sport select committee criticised video-sharing website YouTube, saying it needed to do more to vet its content.In July this year, the Commons culture, media and sport select committee criticised video-sharing website YouTube, saying it needed to do more to vet its content.
At the time, Google, the firm which owns YouTube, stressed the site had strict rules and a system that allowed users to report inappropriate content.At the time, Google, the firm which owns YouTube, stressed the site had strict rules and a system that allowed users to report inappropriate content.