This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/03/woman-wins-first-stage-in-battle-to-overturn-conviction-farieissia-martin

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Woman wins first stage in battle to overturn murder conviction Woman wins first stage in battle to overturn murder conviction
(about 5 hours later)
Farieissia Martin stabbed ex-partner Kyle Farrell during a row at her home in Liverpool in 2014Farieissia Martin stabbed ex-partner Kyle Farrell during a row at her home in Liverpool in 2014
A woman serving a life sentence for stabbing her ex-partner to death has won the first stage of an attempt to overturn her murder conviction. A 26-year-old mother of two serving a life sentence for stabbing her children’s father to death has won the first stage of an attempt to overturn her murder conviction.
Farieissia Martin stabbed Kyle Farrell, 21, during a row at her home in Dingle, Liverpool, in November 2014. Farieissia Martin stabbed Kyle Farrell, 21, through the heart with a kitchen knife at her home in Dingle, Liverpool, in November 2014, during a row that began after she returned late from a friend’s house.
She was jailed for at least 13 years after being found guilty of murder at Liverpool crown court in June 2015. She claimed to have acted in self-defence after Farrell turned violent. But after a two-week trial in June the following year, a jury took just an hour and a half to find her guilty of murder and she was jailed for a minimum term of 13 years.
Three leading judges gave Martin, 26, the go-ahead to bring a full challenge against her conviction at the court of appeal in London on Tuesday. Her lawyers say there is fresh medical evidence relating to her mental state at the time of the killing. Now three judges at the court of appeal in London have agreed to allow Martin to bring a full challenge to her conviction after her lawyers told them is fresh medical evidence relating to her mental state at the time of the killing.
The campaign group Justice for Women, which is supporting her appeal, said the evidence pointed to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder caused by violence to which she had been subjected by Farrell. When Farieissia was arrested, she had initially lied about the events of the evening, and tried to dispose of the knife, behaviour which counted against her in her original trial.
Lady Justice Simler, sitting with Mr Justice Soole and Judge Martin Picton, said it was “arguable” that evidence about the mental disorders Martin had at the time of the killing would have affected the jury’s verdict. But, as a recent Guardian article described, she had also suffered a series of assaults at the hands of her partner, and her defence during her original trial failed to highlight the history of violence in the relationship and assess her mental health.
Martin’s appeal follows a successful challenge brought by Sally Challen over her conviction for the murder of her husband Richard. Challen’s conviction was quashed by the court of appeal in a landmark decision in February, after her lawyers argued she had been the victim of her husband’s coercive and controlling behaviour throughout their marriage. A forensic psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist have both concluded that Martin was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic amnesia at the time of the killing, substantially impairing her ability to exercise self control, Clare Wade QC told the appeal court on Tuesday morning.
She admitted manslaughter and walked free from the Old Bailey in June following more than nine years in prison, after a judge announced she would not be retried for murder. Wade said the domestic abuse Martin suffered during the course of their five-year relationship included outbursts of jealousy, physical violence, insults and gaslighting.
No date was set for Martin’s appeal, which is expected to last a day and a half. Farrell also isolated her from family and friends, kicked her in the stomach when she was pregnant and damaged her possessions, the court heard.
Had all that evidence been put before the jury at the 2015 trial, it would have made a “significant difference” to the way they considered the case, Wade told the court.
Wade said: “Coercive control consists of coercion, degradation and control. It is a form of abuse which focuses particularly on the specific vulnerabilities of the victim.
“And, although its role within the partial defences is a developing jurisprudence, it is this which gives it significance in the context of the partial defence of loss of control.”
Lady Justice Simler, sitting with Mr Justice Soole and Judge Martin Picton, said it is “arguable” that evidence about the mental disorders she had at the time of the killing would have affected the jury’s verdict.
The judge said: “We consider that it is arguable ... that the fresh evidence, if admitted at trial, would have had a substantial effect on the loss of control defence.
“The evidence of PTSD and dissociative behaviour would arguably have gone to the gravity of the trigger for loss of control.
“Had that evidence been available, there would have been medical evidence available at trial that would arguably have explained the moment of the stabbing, about which [Martin] herself could not give any explanation.”
She added: “It would also arguably have provided context for the lies she told in the immediate aftermath of the stabbing, and for all those reasons we consider it arguable that the evidence could have made a difference to the jury’s assessment ... of the partial defence of loss of control and could have supported diminished responsibility.”
Speaking outside court after the hearing, Martin’s parents Lyly Maughan and Leroy Martin said they hoped their daughter would now be given another chance and be able to put forward the new evidence.