This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/03/boris-johnson-ignores-call-to-stop-politicising-london-bridge-victims-death

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Boris Johnson ignores call to stop politicising London Bridge victim's death Boris Johnson ignores call to stop politicising London Bridge attack
(32 minutes later)
Despite David Merritt’s plea over his son, Jack, PM repeats claim that terror incident justifies tougher sentencing Despite plea from father of Jack Merritt, PM repeats claim that tougher sentences are justified
Boris Johnson has refused to acknowledge a heartfelt call from David Merritt to stop politicising the death of his son, Jack, in the London Bridge terror attack last week.Boris Johnson has refused to acknowledge a heartfelt call from David Merritt to stop politicising the death of his son, Jack, in the London Bridge terror attack last week.
On the campaign trail in Salisbury, the prime minister was confronted with the words of Merritt, who said that Jack would have been “seething that his death was being used to perpetuate an agenda of hate that he gave his everything fighting against”.On the campaign trail in Salisbury, the prime minister was confronted with the words of Merritt, who said that Jack would have been “seething that his death was being used to perpetuate an agenda of hate that he gave his everything fighting against”.
But Johnson ignored Merritt’s message and reiterated his insistence that tougher sentencing was the answer to dealing with the threat of terrorists reoffending.But Johnson ignored Merritt’s message and reiterated his insistence that tougher sentencing was the answer to dealing with the threat of terrorists reoffending.
Asked whether he accepted Merritt’s calls for the politicisation to stop, he said: “I’ve campaigned for tougher sentencing for a long time. It was in my manifesto when I stood to be mayor of London in 2012 and I said in August it was a mistake to have automatic release of serious and violent offenders. As you know, there is a bill waiting to go in the Queen’s speech to implement that.Asked whether he accepted Merritt’s calls for the politicisation to stop, he said: “I’ve campaigned for tougher sentencing for a long time. It was in my manifesto when I stood to be mayor of London in 2012 and I said in August it was a mistake to have automatic release of serious and violent offenders. As you know, there is a bill waiting to go in the Queen’s speech to implement that.
“One of the frustrations that I had about this parliament and the lack of a working Conservative majority is that we were unable to progress that. I do think I’m afraid that automatic early release for prisoners of this kind is not the right thing for this country.” “One of the frustrations that I had about this parliament and the lack of a working Conservative majority is that we were unable to progress that. I do think, I’m afraid, that automatic early release for prisoners of this kind is not the right thing for this country.”
The prime minister’s repeated calls for tougher sentencing since the attack on Friday in London have drawn condemnation from opposition parties, who said it was distasteful to exploit the event to promote his policies and to seek to pin the blame on Labour.The prime minister’s repeated calls for tougher sentencing since the attack on Friday in London have drawn condemnation from opposition parties, who said it was distasteful to exploit the event to promote his policies and to seek to pin the blame on Labour.
In an earlier interview with Sky News, Johnson claimed there were “some people who cannot be rehabilitated” and argued that in the case of the attacker, Usman Khan, it would have been “better for the protection of the society and us all to keep him in than run the risk of letting him out”.In an earlier interview with Sky News, Johnson claimed there were “some people who cannot be rehabilitated” and argued that in the case of the attacker, Usman Khan, it would have been “better for the protection of the society and us all to keep him in than run the risk of letting him out”.
Merritt, in his article, said Jack had campaigned against locking people up and “throwing away the key”.Merritt, in his article, said Jack had campaigned against locking people up and “throwing away the key”.
Writing in the Guardian, Merritt said: “If Jack could comment on his death – and the tragic incident on Friday 29 November – he would be livid. We would see him ticking it over in his mind before a word was uttered between us. Jack would understand the political timing with visceral clarity.Writing in the Guardian, Merritt said: “If Jack could comment on his death – and the tragic incident on Friday 29 November – he would be livid. We would see him ticking it over in his mind before a word was uttered between us. Jack would understand the political timing with visceral clarity.
“He would be seething at his death, and his life, being used to perpetuate an agenda of hate that he gave his everything fighting against. We should never forget that.”“He would be seething at his death, and his life, being used to perpetuate an agenda of hate that he gave his everything fighting against. We should never forget that.”
Johnson has been emphasising his security policies this week but advisers claim this was long planned because of the Nato leaders’ meeting taking place on Wednesday.Johnson has been emphasising his security policies this week but advisers claim this was long planned because of the Nato leaders’ meeting taking place on Wednesday.