This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/02/civil-servants-who-deserve-to-be-honoured

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Civil servants who deserve to be honoured Civil servants who deserve to be honoured
(about 3 hours later)
Letter: John Mallinson points out that civil servants often earn less than their private-sector equivalentsLetter: John Mallinson points out that civil servants often earn less than their private-sector equivalents
I’m with you most of the way on the need for honours reform (Editorial, 30 December). In fact, I’d like to see the system abolished completely, so long as the worst offender, the House of Lords, is included. Community honours are a good idea in themselves, but with a degree of arbitrariness that surely makes them susceptible to criticism for being unfair overall – wouldn’t it be better to have suitable recognition locally?I’m with you most of the way on the need for honours reform (Editorial, 30 December). In fact, I’d like to see the system abolished completely, so long as the worst offender, the House of Lords, is included. Community honours are a good idea in themselves, but with a degree of arbitrariness that surely makes them susceptible to criticism for being unfair overall – wouldn’t it be better to have suitable recognition locally?
But while the centralised system remains with us, I have to object strongly to what you say about civil servants – to the extent that you include them in the group that gets gongs “simply because they have done their nine-to-five stint and kept their noses clean”. And since Whitehall and environs is the main source of “automatic” honours, my assumption seems fair.But while the centralised system remains with us, I have to object strongly to what you say about civil servants – to the extent that you include them in the group that gets gongs “simply because they have done their nine-to-five stint and kept their noses clean”. And since Whitehall and environs is the main source of “automatic” honours, my assumption seems fair.
I left the civil service in 1989 and never came across anyone who got a CBE (deputy secretaries as they were then) on this basis. Nobody who worked nine to five would ever have reached this level, and clean noses would have got them nowhere (though these days a less respectful ex-mandarin than me might think that a free supply of tissues in the workplace would be much appreciated in dealing with the odour created in Whitehall by Mr Cummings and his ilk). I left the civil service in 1989 and never came across anyone who got a CB (Companion of the Order of the Bath) on this basis. Nobody who worked nine to five would ever have reached this level, and clean noses would have got them nowhere (though these days a less respectful ex-mandarin than me might think that a free supply of tissues in the workplace would be much appreciated in dealing with the odour created in Whitehall by Mr Cummings and his ilk).
While I admit it doesn’t sanctify the award, more than once during my time in Whitehall I heard more senior colleagues defend the system on the grounds that civil servants at their level “earned more than they were paid” in contrast to their private-sector equivalents, many of whom were claimed to be in a reverse situation. Having worked in both areas in my career, I think this is (or was in my time) broadly correct. When I was a civil servant, my final view on retirement was that Whitehall colleagues were on the whole of a higher quality both in terms of industry and competence than their “equals” elsewhere. But what this does suggest to me is that the “automatic” honours system, though not perfect, is intrinsically unobjectionable. After all, it’s hard to exchange a CBE for cash, though I understand a knighthood is more serviceable. While I admit it doesn’t sanctify the award, more than once during my time in Whitehall I heard more senior colleagues defend the system on the grounds that civil servants at their level “earned more than they were paid” in contrast to their private-sector equivalents, many of whom were claimed to be in a reverse situation. Having worked in both areas in my career, I think this is (or was in my time) broadly correct. When I was a civil servant, my final view on retirement was that Whitehall colleagues were on the whole of a higher quality both in terms of industry and competence than their “equals” elsewhere. But what this does suggest to me is that the “automatic” honours system, though not perfect, is intrinsically unobjectionable. After all, it’s hard to exchange a CB for cash, though I understand a knighthood is more serviceable.
But by all means let us get rid of this part of the system, and pay more to those who merit it. Over to you, prime minister, an apostle of justice and fairness throughout your career.John MallinsonOxted, SurreyBut by all means let us get rid of this part of the system, and pay more to those who merit it. Over to you, prime minister, an apostle of justice and fairness throughout your career.John MallinsonOxted, Surrey
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition