This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/03/us/politics/democratic-candidates-qassem-soleimani.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
How the U.S. Airstrike Could Affect the 2020 Race How the U.S. Airstrike Could Affect the 2020 Race
(30 minutes later)
The American military strike in Baghdad that killed the Iranian general Qassim Suleimani rippled instantly through the Democratic presidential primary on Friday, forcing national security issues to the fore of a race dominated so far by domestic policy and perhaps stirring debates among Democrats over matters of war and peace.The American military strike in Baghdad that killed the Iranian general Qassim Suleimani rippled instantly through the Democratic presidential primary on Friday, forcing national security issues to the fore of a race dominated so far by domestic policy and perhaps stirring debates among Democrats over matters of war and peace.
The party’s presidential candidates reacted to the strike with a measure of unity, at least on the surface level, with expressions of concern about what they called the Trump administration’s penchant for reckless action and the possibility of all-out war. While several deplored Suleimani’s role in directing violence against Americans, the Democrats expressed anxiety rather than jubilation over the circumstances of his demise.The party’s presidential candidates reacted to the strike with a measure of unity, at least on the surface level, with expressions of concern about what they called the Trump administration’s penchant for reckless action and the possibility of all-out war. While several deplored Suleimani’s role in directing violence against Americans, the Democrats expressed anxiety rather than jubilation over the circumstances of his demise.
Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. said President Trump had “tossed a stick of dynamite into a tinderbox,” while Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont warned that the attack “brings us closer to another disastrous war in the Middle East.”Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. said President Trump had “tossed a stick of dynamite into a tinderbox,” while Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont warned that the attack “brings us closer to another disastrous war in the Middle East.”
“Our priority must be to avoid another costly war,” Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts wrote on Twitter. “Our priority must be to avoid another costly war,” Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said.
Pete Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Ind., said there were “serious questions about how this decision was made” and said the attack should not lead to “another endless war.” In North Conway, N.H., on Friday, Pete Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Ind., described the strike as an “extremely provocative act” that both the Obama and George W. Bush administrations had opted not to take against Suleimani.
“If we have learned nothing else from the Middle East in the last 20 years, it’s that taking out a bad guy is not a good idea unless you are ready for what’s coming next,” said Mr. Buttigieg, who uncharacteristically donned a suit jacket over his shirt and tie, apparently conveying the gravity of the moment.
But there were also distinctions in how the leading Democrats responded, pointing the way toward a larger debate in the party about foreign wars and the American presence in the Middle East. Mr. Sanders, for instance, notably used the word “assassination” to describe the killing of the Iranian commander — a term with serious legal and diplomatic implications — and pointed out that he had opposed the 2002 resolution authorizing war in Iraq, leaving unsaid that Mr. Biden had supported it.But there were also distinctions in how the leading Democrats responded, pointing the way toward a larger debate in the party about foreign wars and the American presence in the Middle East. Mr. Sanders, for instance, notably used the word “assassination” to describe the killing of the Iranian commander — a term with serious legal and diplomatic implications — and pointed out that he had opposed the 2002 resolution authorizing war in Iraq, leaving unsaid that Mr. Biden had supported it.
The degree to which military matters come to dominate the primary, in the remaining month before the Iowa caucuses, will likely depend on events in the Middle East, and how severe and visible any ensuing clash with Iran turns out to be. Foreign affairs have played a strictly limited role so far in the Democratic race. There have been major debate-stage duels over health care, taxation, immigration, criminal justice and gun control, but only glancing disagreements about the role of the United States abroad and the proper way to resolve American military engagements in the Middle East and Central Asia.The degree to which military matters come to dominate the primary, in the remaining month before the Iowa caucuses, will likely depend on events in the Middle East, and how severe and visible any ensuing clash with Iran turns out to be. Foreign affairs have played a strictly limited role so far in the Democratic race. There have been major debate-stage duels over health care, taxation, immigration, criminal justice and gun control, but only glancing disagreements about the role of the United States abroad and the proper way to resolve American military engagements in the Middle East and Central Asia.
In 2020, the possibility of a new and protracted conflict abroad could well reshape the general election, even beyond the Democratic race. Mr. Trump ran for president on a pledge to pull back the United States from foreign wars, drawing support from unconventional quarters for a Republican because of the perception that he would pursue an “America First” policy of relative isolationism and national self-interest.In 2020, the possibility of a new and protracted conflict abroad could well reshape the general election, even beyond the Democratic race. Mr. Trump ran for president on a pledge to pull back the United States from foreign wars, drawing support from unconventional quarters for a Republican because of the perception that he would pursue an “America First” policy of relative isolationism and national self-interest.
But Mr. Trump had already drawn criticism from his Democratic rivals, and even within his own party, for presiding over a chaotic pullback from Syria, and the eruption of large-scale violence in Iran and Iraq could profoundly complicate his aim to seek a second term on a message of peace and prosperity.But Mr. Trump had already drawn criticism from his Democratic rivals, and even within his own party, for presiding over a chaotic pullback from Syria, and the eruption of large-scale violence in Iran and Iraq could profoundly complicate his aim to seek a second term on a message of peace and prosperity.
In the Democratic primary, foreign policy experience has largely been regarded as an asset of Mr. Biden, given his global stature as a former vice president and his background as chairman of the foreign relations committee in the Senate. He has made restoring American alliances around the world a central theme of his campaign and criticized Mr. Trump for turning the United States into a punch line at gatherings of global leaders.In the Democratic primary, foreign policy experience has largely been regarded as an asset of Mr. Biden, given his global stature as a former vice president and his background as chairman of the foreign relations committee in the Senate. He has made restoring American alliances around the world a central theme of his campaign and criticized Mr. Trump for turning the United States into a punch line at gatherings of global leaders.
On Friday, Mr. Biden declared on Twitter that the world “has been set on edge by an erratic, unstable and dangerously incompetent commander in chief.” Proposing himself as a safe alternative, Mr. Biden posted a campaign advertisement that showed him meeting with troops and walking beside former President Barack Obama.On Friday, Mr. Biden declared on Twitter that the world “has been set on edge by an erratic, unstable and dangerously incompetent commander in chief.” Proposing himself as a safe alternative, Mr. Biden posted a campaign advertisement that showed him meeting with troops and walking beside former President Barack Obama.
“Every day that Donald Trump directs American national security is a dangerous day for the United States and the world,” Mr. Biden said.“Every day that Donald Trump directs American national security is a dangerous day for the United States and the world,” Mr. Biden said.
But an intensifying debate over foreign policy could have the effect of both spotlighting Mr. Biden’s extensive résumé and also subjecting his track record in the region to new scrutiny. There have been signs in recent days that several of the leading Democratic candidates were angling for a foreign policy debate with Mr. Biden, even before the outbreak of violence in Iraq and the Suleimani killing came to dominate the news.But an intensifying debate over foreign policy could have the effect of both spotlighting Mr. Biden’s extensive résumé and also subjecting his track record in the region to new scrutiny. There have been signs in recent days that several of the leading Democratic candidates were angling for a foreign policy debate with Mr. Biden, even before the outbreak of violence in Iraq and the Suleimani killing came to dominate the news.
Mr. Sanders has campaigned consistently on his antiwar record, and he has repeatedly highlighted Mr. Biden’s past support for the Iraq war, warning Democrats that Mr. Trump would use that record against the former vice president in a general election. On Friday morning, an aide to Mr. Sanders posted images on Twitter showing the progressive lawmaker speaking out against war in Iraq in 1991, 1998, 2002 and 2014.Mr. Sanders has campaigned consistently on his antiwar record, and he has repeatedly highlighted Mr. Biden’s past support for the Iraq war, warning Democrats that Mr. Trump would use that record against the former vice president in a general election. On Friday morning, an aide to Mr. Sanders posted images on Twitter showing the progressive lawmaker speaking out against war in Iraq in 1991, 1998, 2002 and 2014.
Mr. Buttigieg has attempted to counter questions about his own relative inexperience by pointing to Mr. Biden’s stances on Iraq, as an example of how experience was not always an asset in campaigning or governing.Mr. Buttigieg has attempted to counter questions about his own relative inexperience by pointing to Mr. Biden’s stances on Iraq, as an example of how experience was not always an asset in campaigning or governing.
“He supported the worst foreign policy decision made by the United States in my lifetime, which was the decision to invade Iraq,” Mr. Buttigieg said in an Iowa television interview.“He supported the worst foreign policy decision made by the United States in my lifetime, which was the decision to invade Iraq,” Mr. Buttigieg said in an Iowa television interview.
And in his statement on Friday, Mr. Buttigieg repeatedly cited his own military service to suggest he had a distinctive grasp of the situation.And in his statement on Friday, Mr. Buttigieg repeatedly cited his own military service to suggest he had a distinctive grasp of the situation.
Ms. Warren, too, has indicated in the past that she takes a skeptical view of American military involvement in the Middle East, and declared in one of the fall debates that the United States should remove its combat troops from the region. That stance could become a dividing line in the primary, separating progressives like her and Mr. Sanders from Mr. Biden and others.Ms. Warren, too, has indicated in the past that she takes a skeptical view of American military involvement in the Middle East, and declared in one of the fall debates that the United States should remove its combat troops from the region. That stance could become a dividing line in the primary, separating progressives like her and Mr. Sanders from Mr. Biden and others.
For now, much of the Democratic field was proceeding with — and recommending — caution. Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York released a statement questioning whether the president had fully considered “the grave risks involved,” while Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota called on the administration to consult with Congress about a “strategy for preventing a wider conflict.”For now, much of the Democratic field was proceeding with — and recommending — caution. Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York released a statement questioning whether the president had fully considered “the grave risks involved,” while Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota called on the administration to consult with Congress about a “strategy for preventing a wider conflict.”
There is some precedent for events overseas reshaping American primary elections, usually to the benefit of a candidate regarded as a figure of experience. In December 2003, the capture of Saddam Hussein in Iraq formed a backdrop for the final phase of a Democratic presidential primary that yielded the quick nomination of John F. Kerry, a Vietnam veteran who served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.There is some precedent for events overseas reshaping American primary elections, usually to the benefit of a candidate regarded as a figure of experience. In December 2003, the capture of Saddam Hussein in Iraq formed a backdrop for the final phase of a Democratic presidential primary that yielded the quick nomination of John F. Kerry, a Vietnam veteran who served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Four years later, in 2007, the troop surge in Afghanistan and the December assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan pushed national security to the center of an unsettled Republican primary that ended with the nomination of John S. McCain, the war hero whose campaign focused overwhelmingly on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.Four years later, in 2007, the troop surge in Afghanistan and the December assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan pushed national security to the center of an unsettled Republican primary that ended with the nomination of John S. McCain, the war hero whose campaign focused overwhelmingly on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist who advised the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, said national security tended to become an election issue — in primaries and general elections — mainly in response to major external developments. He cited the Benghazi attack in the fall of 2012 and the Paris nightclub massacre in 2015 as other recent examples. Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist who advised Mr. Bush and Mitt Romney’s presidential campaigns, said national security tended to become an election issue — in primaries and general elections — mainly in response to major external developments. He cited the Benghazi attack in the fall of 2012 and the Paris nightclub massacre in 2015 as other recent examples.
”The economy is baked into the cake of every presidential election. But the national security issue focus tends to be driven by big events,” Mr. Madden said. “Every recent contest has had one of these events where everything seems to stop and cause all the participants, from the candidates and campaigns to the voters and the media, to recalibrate the stakes of the election through the lens of national security and foreign policy.””The economy is baked into the cake of every presidential election. But the national security issue focus tends to be driven by big events,” Mr. Madden said. “Every recent contest has had one of these events where everything seems to stop and cause all the participants, from the candidates and campaigns to the voters and the media, to recalibrate the stakes of the election through the lens of national security and foreign policy.”
Reid J. Epstein contributed reporting from North Conway, N.H.