This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/business/wells-fargo-ceo-fine.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Wells Fargo’s Ex-Chief Fined $17.5 Million Over Fake Accounts Wells Fargo’s Ex-Chief Fined $17.5 Million Over Fake Accounts
(about 3 hours later)
In a rare example of personal accountability for corporate wrongdoing, Wells Fargo’s former chief executive, John G. Stumpf, was fined $17.5 million on Thursday by the bank’s main federal regulator, which also took punitive action against seven other executives for the bank’s toxic sales culture and illegal acts. When big companies do wrong, it’s rarely the big boss who pays the price.
In a settlement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Mr. Stumpf also agreed to a lifetime ban from the banking industry for his role in the company’s misdeeds, which included foisting unwanted products and sham bank accounts on millions of customers. Two other former senior executives agreed to lesser fines and restrictions on their work in the industry, and the regulator said it was taking enforcement action against five others. But on Thursday, Wells Fargo’s former chief executive John G. Stumpf was fined $17.5 million — the largest individual fine in the history of the bank’s main federal regulator — for his role in a toxic sales culture that foisted unwanted products and sham bank accounts on millions of customers.
Regulators sharply rebuked the former leaders for favoring profits and other market rewards over protecting their customers. In settlements with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Mr. Stumpf also agreed to a lifetime ban from the banking industry, and two other former senior Wells Fargo executives — a chief risk officer and a chief administrative officer — agreed to lesser fines and restrictions on their work in the industry. Five others, including a former head of Wells Fargo’s retail banking operations, were also charged by the regulator.
“The bank had better tools and systems to detect employees who did not meet unreasonable sales goals than it did to catch employees who engaged in sales practices misconduct,” the office said. In a damning 100-page legal filing, the agency offered fresh details about the bank’s relentless pressure on employees to meet its unrealistic goals, which included “hazing-like abuse.” Many employees said they felt they had only two options: Cheat or get fired.
All told, the regulator was seeking tens of millions of dollars in personal fines from the executives, who could face even more serious consequences: A Justice Department investigation into the actions of Wells Fargo and its leaders remains open. Employees at one branch said they had been told to hit their targets or they would be “transferred to a store where someone had been shot and killed.” A veteran of the 1991 Persian Gulf war wrote in a letter to Mr. Stumpf that he had found his time in a war zone less stressful than working at Wells Fargo. From 2011 to 2016, the bank fired more than 8,000 people for sales records it deemed subpar.
While it is not unusual for companies to face regulatory or even criminal charges, senior executives — particularly chief executives — usually avoid personal repercussions. The largest American banks, for example, have all paid many billions of dollars to settle civil cases stemming from their mortgage securitization activities in the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis, but their chief executives have not given up a penny to regulators. “The bank had better tools and systems to detect employees who did not meet unreasonable sales goals than it did to catch employees who engaged in sales practices misconduct,” the regulator said in legal filings that contained a number of redactions.
The fine against Mr. Stumpf was the largest against an individual in the O.C.C.’s history, according to a spokesman for the office. But the regulator sought a larger penalty — a $25 million fine — from Carrie L. Tolstedt, the bank’s former retail banking leader, who is fighting the agency’s civil charges against her. The settlements were a rare instance of personal consequences for those at the highest echelons of the banking industry. Even though the biggest American banks paid billions of dollars to settle civil cases stemming from their mortgage activities in the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis, their chief executives have not given up a penny to federal bank regulators.
Ms. Tolstedt, who left the bank in 2016, “acted with the utmost integrity” and will be vindicated by “a full and fair examination of the facts,” her lawyer, Enu Mainigi, said in a statement. Mr. Stumpf’s fine, while record setting, is not the largest penalty being sought by the regulator in the case. It wants to impose a $25 million fine on one of his subordinates: Carrie L. Tolstedt, Wells Fargo’s former head of retail banking.
Mr. Stumpf, in a sworn statement to the O.C.C., blamed Ms. Tolstedt and others for what he acknowledged was “systemic” misconduct throughout the bank. Mr. Stumpf, in a sworn statement to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, blamed Ms. Tolstedt and others for what he acknowledged was “systemic” misconduct throughout the bank. A 2017 investigation by Wells Fargo’s board blasted Ms. Tolstedt for creating a sales culture that fostered fraud, and Mr. Stumpf for turning a blind eye to it.
Wells Fargo’s problems erupted into public view in late 2016, setting off a crisis that continues to reverberate more than three years later. Mr. Stumpf, the chief executive at the time, was quickly ousted. His successor, Timothy J. Sloan, resigned last year after failing to quell the bank’s turmoil. Ms. Tolstedt, who left the bank in 2016, is fighting the regulator’s civil charges. Her lawyer, Enu Mainigi, said in a statement that Ms. Tolstedt had “acted with the utmost integrity” and would be vindicated by “a full and fair examination of the facts.”
The eight executives charged on Thursday “failed to adequately perform their duties and responsibilities” and contributed to problems that stretched back more than a decade, the regulator said. Wells Fargo’s conduct erupted into public view in late 2016, setting off a crisis that continues to reverberate more than three years later. Mr. Stumpf, the bank’s chief executive since 2007, was quickly ousted. His successor, Timothy J. Sloan, resigned last year after failing to quell the bank’s turmoil.
Months before the bank’s troubles became public, Mr. Stumpf exercised all of his vested stock options, turning them into shares worth tens of millions of dollars that he owned outright. Wells Fargo later clawed back his unvested stock awards and some of his retirement payout, costing him $69 million but still leaving him in possession of an enviable fortune.
Further repercussions are still possible for Wells Fargo’s former leaders: The Justice Department is continuing an investigation.
Even if Thursday’s fines are the last word in regulatory action, they were an unusual flexing of federal enforcement at the highest reaches of banking.
JPMorgan Chase’s chief executive, Jamie Dimon — the longest tenured of the big bank leaders — has weathered scandals like the $6 billion trading loss brought about by a trader nicknamed the London Whale and a money-laundering case related to the Ponzi schemer Bernard L. Madoff. Two former traders for the bank have faced criminal charges, and the bank as a whole has paid nearly $44 billion in penalties since the financial crisis, but none of the enforcement actions against the bank have been directed at Mr. Dimon personally.
Bank of America has paid $76 billion in fines since the crisis — the most by any bank — but its chief executive during the 2008 panic, Kenneth D. Lewis, shelled out zero dollars to federal regulators despite presiding over the bank’s abuses of mortgage borrowers and its acquisition of the mortgage lender Countrywide Financial, another abuser. He did pay a $10 million fine, but that was the result of a settlement with New York State prosecutors.
(There have been exceptions: Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide’s leader, paid almost $68 million in fines to the Securities and Exchange Commission over his role in the financial crisis.)
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said the eight Wells Fargo executives had “failed to adequately perform their duties and responsibilities” and contributed to problems that stretched back more than a decade.
Wells Fargo’s new chief executive, Charles W. Scharf, said in a memo to employees on Thursday that the bank would stop all payments to the former executives, if any were pending.Wells Fargo’s new chief executive, Charles W. Scharf, said in a memo to employees on Thursday that the bank would stop all payments to the former executives, if any were pending.
“This was inexcusable. Our customers and you all deserved more from the leadership of this company,” wrote Mr. Scharf, who joined Wells Fargo in October. “This was inexcusable. Our customers and you all deserved more from the leadership of this company,” wrote Mr. Scharf, who joined Wells Fargo in October. “We are reviewing today’s filings and will determine what, if any, further action by the company is appropriate.”
“We are reviewing today’s filings and will determine what, if any, further action by the company is appropriate with respect to any of the named individuals,” he added. “Wells Fargo will not make any remaining compensation payments that may be owed to these individuals while we review the filings.”
Wells Fargo has been operating since early 2018 under a set of growth restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve, a rare move that has hobbled the bank’s turnaround efforts. It is one of a dozen enforcement actions that Wells Fargo is working to resolve, Mr. Scharf has said.Wells Fargo has been operating since early 2018 under a set of growth restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve, a rare move that has hobbled the bank’s turnaround efforts. It is one of a dozen enforcement actions that Wells Fargo is working to resolve, Mr. Scharf has said.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates. In addition to Ms. Tolstedt, four other senior executives face charges from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, including James Strother, the bank’s former general counsel. Mr. Strother’s lawyer, Walt Brown, said his client had “acted with the utmost integrity” and called the allegations against him false.
Ms. Tolstedt, Mr. Strother and the other three former executives will face a hearing before an administrative law judge in South Dakota, where Wells Fargo’s retail bank has its main office. No date has been set.