This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51229748

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Trump impeachment trial: What happened so far Trump impeachment: How the trial unfolded
(4 days later)
Lawyers representing President Donald Trump have begun their defence of the US leader in his impeachment trial. The impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is hurdling towards its conclusion as senators prepare to cast votes after arguments on both sides ended on Thursday.
It comes after Democrats wrapped up their presentation in the case for his removal on Friday. It comes after Democrats suffered an apparent blow to their hopes of introducing new witnesses to the trial that could help their case for removing Mr Trump from office.
Democratic congressmen who serve as prosecutors in the trial have laid out meticulous evidence over three days that they said proved Mr Trump had abused his power and obstructed Congress. Democratic congressmen who serve as prosecutors in the trial had laid out meticulous evidence over three days that they said proved Mr Trump had abused his power and obstructed Congress.
They alleged that he pressured Ukraine to dig up political dirt on Joe Biden, a domestic rival, and that he sought to hide the evidence from Congress, another impeachable offence.They alleged that he pressured Ukraine to dig up political dirt on Joe Biden, a domestic rival, and that he sought to hide the evidence from Congress, another impeachable offence.
President Trump and senior Republicans claim Mr Biden and his son Hunter were involved in a corrupt business scheme in Ukraine.President Trump and senior Republicans claim Mr Biden and his son Hunter were involved in a corrupt business scheme in Ukraine.
As they opened their defence on Saturday, the president's lawyers said he had done "absolutely nothing wrong". The White House lawyers, on the other hand, argued Mr Trump had done "nothing wrong" and that the president has not committed offences that would warrant his removal.
Here's a look back at what happened this week, and what we can expect to see in the coming days, with the help of the BBC's Anthony Zurcher. Here's a look back at what happened over the course of just under two weeks.
How the prosecution case unfoldedHow the prosecution case unfolded
Proceedings began on Tuesday with a tussle between Democrats and Republicans over the rules of the trial. Proceedings began on 21 January with a tussle between Democrats and Republicans over the rules of the trial.
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell proposed a tight two-day limit for opening arguments by both sides, before extending it to three after protests from Democrats.Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell proposed a tight two-day limit for opening arguments by both sides, before extending it to three after protests from Democrats.
Mr McConnell has delayed until next week debate over motions from Democrats to allow new witnesses to be called and fresh evidence submitted. Mr McConnell delayed debate over motions from Democrats to allow new witnesses to be called and fresh evidence submitted.
Democratic congressman Adam Schiff, the head of seven impeachment managers who serve as prosecutors, opened oral arguments to a packed Senate chamber on Wednesday. Democratic congressman Adam Schiff, the head of seven impeachment managers who serve as prosecutors, opened oral arguments to a packed Senate chamber on 22 January.
Mr Schiff said the president's actions were exactly what the Founding Fathers feared when they came up with impeachment - "a remedy as powerful as the evil it was meant to combat", Mr Schiff said.Mr Schiff said the president's actions were exactly what the Founding Fathers feared when they came up with impeachment - "a remedy as powerful as the evil it was meant to combat", Mr Schiff said.
The impeachment managers walked the senators through testimony gathered during depositions and committee hearings last year that they say points to a scheme by Mr Trump and his advisers to lean on Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.The impeachment managers walked the senators through testimony gathered during depositions and committee hearings last year that they say points to a scheme by Mr Trump and his advisers to lean on Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.
The managers interspersed their oral arguments with audio and video tape, using the president's own words - including a now-infamous call with the president of Ukraine - in their effort to portray him as guilty.The managers interspersed their oral arguments with audio and video tape, using the president's own words - including a now-infamous call with the president of Ukraine - in their effort to portray him as guilty.
They directly addressed the claims against the Bidens - a purposeful attempt to get on the front foot ahead of the president's defence.They directly addressed the claims against the Bidens - a purposeful attempt to get on the front foot ahead of the president's defence.
Representative Hakeem Jefferies, an impeachment manager, eschewed the founding fathers, choosing instead to quote the late Brooklyn rapper Notorious BIG. The managers then tackled the obstruction of Congress charge.
"And if you don't know, now you know," he said - a famous line from the song. He stood next to a picture of the rapper mounted on an easel - a first for the Senate chamber.
On Friday, the managers tackled the obstruction of Congress charge.
The managers argued that Mr Trump's refusal to allow certain members of his administration to answer questions from the House of Representatives was akin to hiding information from a grand jury investigation.The managers argued that Mr Trump's refusal to allow certain members of his administration to answer questions from the House of Representatives was akin to hiding information from a grand jury investigation.
Anthony's take on the prosecution: How the defence unfolded
The Democrats were determined to squeeze every drop out of the opportunity they were afforded. Republican senators, who had to sit through the marathon sessions - Schiff, alone, would speak for hours at a time - criticised the presentation as repetitive, but repetitive was the point. During opening arguments, Mr Trump's team took barely two hours to argue that the president had done nothing wrong.
For three days the Democratic case against the president, broadcast during the daytime on US network television and gavel-to-gavel on cable news networks, was ubiquitous. It was unavoidable.
It may not be nearly enough to convince the requisite number of Republican senators, but the uninterrupted fusillade was as much geared toward public opinion as it was towards the people in the Capitol.
The defence case so far
During opening arguments on Saturday, Mr Trump's team took barely two hours to argue that the president had done nothing wrong.
His team insisted that Mr Trump had acted in the national interests in his phone call with the Ukrainian president, with Deputy White House Counsel Mike Purpura pinpointing a line from the transcript in which Mr Trump asked Volodymyr Zelensky to "do us a favour", rather than "me".His team insisted that Mr Trump had acted in the national interests in his phone call with the Ukrainian president, with Deputy White House Counsel Mike Purpura pinpointing a line from the transcript in which Mr Trump asked Volodymyr Zelensky to "do us a favour", rather than "me".
Mr Purpura also insisted there was no quid pro quo, saying Mr Zelensky "says he felt no pressure".Mr Purpura also insisted there was no quid pro quo, saying Mr Zelensky "says he felt no pressure".
The defence accused the Democrats of trying to remove Mr Trump from the ballot this year, and said the American electorate should be allowed to decide for themselves.The defence accused the Democrats of trying to remove Mr Trump from the ballot this year, and said the American electorate should be allowed to decide for themselves.
Resuming arguments on Monday, attorney Kenneth Starr warned senators that impeachment could become "normalised" and used as a weapon against future administrations. Resuming arguments on 27 January, attorney Kenneth Starr warned senators that impeachment could become "normalised" and used as a weapon against future administrations.
Mr Starr came to prominence in 1998, when he led an investigation into Democratic President Bill Clinton that laid the foundation for his impeachment.Mr Starr came to prominence in 1998, when he led an investigation into Democratic President Bill Clinton that laid the foundation for his impeachment.
"Like war, impeachment is hell," Mr Starr said on Monday. "It's filled with acrimony and divides the country like nothing else. Those of us who lived through the Clinton impeachment understand that in a deep and personal way.""Like war, impeachment is hell," Mr Starr said on Monday. "It's filled with acrimony and divides the country like nothing else. Those of us who lived through the Clinton impeachment understand that in a deep and personal way."
Following Mr Starr, Trump defence lawyer Jane Raskin addressed Rudy Giuliani - Mr Trump's personal attorney and a central character in the impeachment case.Following Mr Starr, Trump defence lawyer Jane Raskin addressed Rudy Giuliani - Mr Trump's personal attorney and a central character in the impeachment case.
"Mr Giuliani was not on a political errand," she said, referring to his investigations in Ukraine."Mr Giuliani was not on a political errand," she said, referring to his investigations in Ukraine.
"Rudy Giuliani is the House managers' colourful distraction," Ms Raskin said - a way for the Democratic impeachment managers, who act as prosecutors, to divert attention from weaknesses in their case."Rudy Giuliani is the House managers' colourful distraction," Ms Raskin said - a way for the Democratic impeachment managers, who act as prosecutors, to divert attention from weaknesses in their case.
The defence will continue its arguments on Tuesday. When this is over, they will again tussle over whether to introduce new witnesses. What happened during questioning?
On 29 January, senators began a period of questioning after opening arguments concluded.
Over two days and 16 hours on the floor, they submitted over 100 queries written on cards to Chief Justice John Roberts, who read them to the House managers and defence.
The justice was firm about keeping time, limiting answers to five minutes.
Questions alternated between Republicans and Democrats as lawmakers had their first chance to push back against claims made by both sides. A few queries were bipartisan.
Senators were not, however, allowed to address each other in their questioning.
The queries came amid a contentious debate over whether or not witnesses should be allowed in the trial - a matter that comes to a vote on Friday.
One submission was blocked by the Chief Justice: Republican Rand Paul's question that included the name of a person believed to be the whistleblower that sparked the entire impeachment inquiry was rejected.
Other questions, including when the president ordered the aid hold on Ukraine and whether Mr Trump ever mentioned the Bidens prior to Joe Biden entering the 2020 race, were not fully answered.
On Friday, the trial moves into four hours of debate over whether new witnesses and documents should be permitted.