This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/iowa-could-pick-the-big-winner-but-whats-really-likely-is-more-of-a-muddle/2020/01/24/895a54cc-3e26-11ea-b90d-5652806c3b3a_story.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Iowa is looking less and less like that clarifying moment Democrats had hoped for Iowa is looking less and less like that clarifying moment Democrats had hoped for
(about 3 hours later)
As we head into the last week before actual voters will have their first chance to weigh in, Democrats are hoping that the outcome in the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses may begin to bring some clarity to the ungainly Democratic race. As we enter the last week before actual voters will have their first chance to weigh in, Democrats are hoping that the outcome in the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses may begin to bring some clarity to the ungainly Democratic race.
Iowa has a history of picking Democratic winners. In seven of the 10 contested Democratic races since 1972, the first-place finisher in the Iowa caucuses has gone on to become the party’s nominee. (By comparison, the GOP outcome tends to be an aberration; not since George W. Bush won the caucuses two decades ago has Iowa’s pick won the nomination in a race when there is not already a Republican in the White House.)Iowa has a history of picking Democratic winners. In seven of the 10 contested Democratic races since 1972, the first-place finisher in the Iowa caucuses has gone on to become the party’s nominee. (By comparison, the GOP outcome tends to be an aberration; not since George W. Bush won the caucuses two decades ago has Iowa’s pick won the nomination in a race when there is not already a Republican in the White House.)
This year, with a dozen Democrats in contention, there are at least two scenarios in which the Iowa result could definitively shape the way the Democratic race unfolds.This year, with a dozen Democrats in contention, there are at least two scenarios in which the Iowa result could definitively shape the way the Democratic race unfolds.
One of them is if former vice president Joe Biden pulls off a convincing victory. An Iowa win, coupled with Biden’s durable lead in the national numbers, could position him as all but unstoppable going forward.One of them is if former vice president Joe Biden pulls off a convincing victory. An Iowa win, coupled with Biden’s durable lead in the national numbers, could position him as all but unstoppable going forward.
Another would be a big win by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who is enjoying a surge in the latest polls. The contest would then become a scramble within the party to find an establishment figure who can stop Sanders. One possible beneficiary might be former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg, who is spending staggering sums across the map to put into place a campaign strategy that would kick into gear when Super Tuesday arrives in early March.Another would be a big win by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who is enjoying a surge in the latest polls. The contest would then become a scramble within the party to find an establishment figure who can stop Sanders. One possible beneficiary might be former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg, who is spending staggering sums across the map to put into place a campaign strategy that would kick into gear when Super Tuesday arrives in early March.
What seems at least as likely as either of those outcomes, however, is that Iowa yields more of a muddle, producing a relatively close finish among the top three or four contenders. Complicating everything this year is a new set of party rules, which have the potential to add more confusion.What seems at least as likely as either of those outcomes, however, is that Iowa yields more of a muddle, producing a relatively close finish among the top three or four contenders. Complicating everything this year is a new set of party rules, which have the potential to add more confusion.
Iowa doesn’t seem like the ideal place for Democrats to start their shopping for a nominee. The state’s registered Democrats are neither a cross-section of the United States nor representative of an increasingly diverse party that needs more young voter participation to win. According to data collected by L2, a private firm that maintains a National Voter File, nearly 80 percent of Iowa’s Democrats are white; their median age is 55 years old.Iowa doesn’t seem like the ideal place for Democrats to start their shopping for a nominee. The state’s registered Democrats are neither a cross-section of the United States nor representative of an increasingly diverse party that needs more young voter participation to win. According to data collected by L2, a private firm that maintains a National Voter File, nearly 80 percent of Iowa’s Democrats are white; their median age is 55 years old.
Some party officials are predicting that turnout will break records. But even if it does, the numbers will still be small in overall terms. In 2016, only about 1 in 4 registered Democrats participated.Some party officials are predicting that turnout will break records. But even if it does, the numbers will still be small in overall terms. In 2016, only about 1 in 4 registered Democrats participated.
One reason is that the caucus process itself is quirky and time-consuming.One reason is that the caucus process itself is quirky and time-consuming.
Here’s how it works: At 7 p.m. Central time on Monday, Feb. 3, Democrats will gather in 1,678 caucus sites across the state — places such as school cafeterias, churches and libraries. For the first time, the party will also set up 90-plus “satellite” locations to accommodate people who work night hours or who have disabilities that prevent them from getting to regular caucus locations. Some satellite locations are also being set up for eligible Iowans in other states or overseas.Here’s how it works: At 7 p.m. Central time on Monday, Feb. 3, Democrats will gather in 1,678 caucus sites across the state — places such as school cafeterias, churches and libraries. For the first time, the party will also set up 90-plus “satellite” locations to accommodate people who work night hours or who have disabilities that prevent them from getting to regular caucus locations. Some satellite locations are also being set up for eligible Iowans in other states or overseas.
After a bit of speechmaking, caucusgoers will break into groups according to which presidential candidate they support. Any contender who fails to get at least 15 percent of those in attendance is deemed nonviable; his or her backers will get a chance to join the supporters of their second choice.After a bit of speechmaking, caucusgoers will break into groups according to which presidential candidate they support. Any contender who fails to get at least 15 percent of those in attendance is deemed nonviable; his or her backers will get a chance to join the supporters of their second choice.
All this takes a while. Then comes some messy math, which just about nobody understands and can involve occasional coin flips to pick winners when the vote counts result in fractional outcomes. At the end of the evening, party officials will allocate delegates to the state party convention according to the individual caucus results. The 2016 result was the closest ever, with former secretary of state Hillary Clinton receiving 49.8 percent of delegate equivalents and Sanders getting 49.6 percent. All this takes awhile. Then comes some messy math, which just about nobody understands and can involve occasional coin flips to pick winners when the vote counts result in fractional outcomes. At the end of the evening, party officials will allocate delegates to the state party convention according to the individual caucus results. The 2016 result was the closest ever, with former secretary of state Hillary Clinton receiving 49.8 percent of delegate equivalents and Sanders getting 49.6 percent.
This time around, and for the first time, the Iowa Democratic Party will also announce how many actual votes each candidate received in the two rounds of caucusing.This time around, and for the first time, the Iowa Democratic Party will also announce how many actual votes each candidate received in the two rounds of caucusing.
The move, which comes in response to complaints of unfairness from the Sanders campaign after 2016, is designed to make the whole process more transparent.The move, which comes in response to complaints of unfairness from the Sanders campaign after 2016, is designed to make the whole process more transparent.
But it could actually create a new kind of chaos.But it could actually create a new kind of chaos.
It opens the potential for a split, electoral college/popular vote kind of situation. One candidate might come out ahead in delegate totals — which is the traditional definition of winning in Iowa — while another runs up the highest overall tally of votes across the state. No doubt both would claim to be the victor.It opens the potential for a split, electoral college/popular vote kind of situation. One candidate might come out ahead in delegate totals — which is the traditional definition of winning in Iowa — while another runs up the highest overall tally of votes across the state. No doubt both would claim to be the victor.
Or the candidate who has the most votes in the first round might fall behind in the subsequent one, when supporters of nonviable contenders move to their second choices.Or the candidate who has the most votes in the first round might fall behind in the subsequent one, when supporters of nonviable contenders move to their second choices.
All of which could call more uncomfortable attention to the real issue: Iowa’s cherished — and increasingly indefensible — spot at the front of the campaign calendar.All of which could call more uncomfortable attention to the real issue: Iowa’s cherished — and increasingly indefensible — spot at the front of the campaign calendar.
If turmoil turns out to be all that Iowa has to offer Democrats this year, the loser may end up being the Hawkeye State itself.If turmoil turns out to be all that Iowa has to offer Democrats this year, the loser may end up being the Hawkeye State itself.
Read more:Read more:
Jennifer Rubin: Why Iowa is so complicatedJennifer Rubin: Why Iowa is so complicated
Paul Waldman: The Iowa caucuses are a crime against democracyPaul Waldman: The Iowa caucuses are a crime against democracy
Karen Tumulty: Trump took aim at kids’ nutrition. He picked the wrong food fight.Karen Tumulty: Trump took aim at kids’ nutrition. He picked the wrong food fight.
David Byler: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama want to stop Bernie Sanders. Can they actually do it?David Byler: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama want to stop Bernie Sanders. Can they actually do it?
Jennifer Rubin: An open letter to Iowa caucus votersJennifer Rubin: An open letter to Iowa caucus voters