This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/28/migration-committee-advises-against-full-points-based-system-for-uk

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Migration committee advises against full points-based system for UK Migration committee rejects full points-based system for UK
(about 4 hours later)
Report gives first detailed insight into how immigration system might look after BrexitReport gives first detailed insight into how immigration system might look after Brexit
The independent migration advisory committee does not recommend a full shift to an Australian points-based system in research giving the first detailed insight into how a reformed immigration system might look after Brexit and the ending of freedom of movement for EU nationals. The independent migration advisory committee has rejected a full shift to an Australian points-based system, publishing detailed research which gives a picture of how a reformed immigration system might look after Brexit and the ending of freedom of movement for EU nationals.
In a report published on Tuesday, the independent committee, which provides research-based advice to the government, recommends a mixed system, which would rely on a minimum salary threshold for those people coming to the UK with a job offer, and a points-based system for those coming to the UK without a pre-arranged job. The Conservatives promised to introduce an “Australian-style points-based system to control immigration” as one of six key guarantees listed on page one of their manifesto. The committee’s chair dismissed the notion as a “soundbite”.
“Talented individuals” would be able to apply for a work visa under the points-based system. “What exactly does an Australian-style points-based system mean?” Prof Alan Manning, the chair of the committee, asked. “The problem is that it means different things to different people.”
Its recommendations would reduce levels of immigration, the size of the UK population and total GDP. “We expect the changes to very slightly increase GDP per capita, productivity and improve public finances, though these estimates are more uncertain,” the report states. Instead its experts recommended a mixed system, which would rely on a minimum salary threshold for those people coming to the UK with a job offer, and a points-based system for skilled workers coming to the UK without an arranged job. “Talented individuals” would be able to apply for a work visa under this points-based system.
“The changes are also expected to reduce pressures on the NHS, schools and on social housing, though they will increase pressure on social care.” The committee’s detailed recommendations would reduce levels of immigration, the size of the UK population and total GDP, Manning said. “We expect the changes to very slightly increase GDP per capita, productivity and improve public finances, though these estimates are more uncertain,” the report states. “The changes are also expected to reduce pressures on the NHS, schools and on social housing, though they will increase pressure on social care.”
Downing Street indicated it was unlikely to notably change course on its immigration plans in the wake of the report. Downing Street indicated it was unlikely to notably change course on its immigration plans as a result of the report.
The migration advisory committee (MAC) was asked by the home secretary, Priti Patel, last year to research how an Australian points-based system might work. The committee was asked by the home secretary, Priti Patel, last year to research how an Australian points-based system might work. The government is not required to accept its recommendations but is now under pressure to clarify its own vision for a post-Brexit immigration system, which will be governed by the same rules for people inside and outside the EU.
The government is not required to accept the committee’s recommendations, although it is likely to base future immigration policy on the committee’s research. The committee urged politicians to act fast, pointing out that there is not much time left to devise and implement an overhauled system if employers are to have time before the end of the transition period to plan for substantial changes to how they recruit staff.
The government has alluded to the desirability of an Australian points-based system for months, without explaining how this might work. This report gives the first assessment of whether provides a desirable model for the UK economy. The government has alluded to the desirability of an Australian-style system for months, without explaining how this might work. This report gives the first assessment of whether it provides a suitable model for the UK economy.
If the government wants a points-based system it should only introduce it in the route for skilled workers without a job offer, the committee concludes. If the government wants a points-based system it should only introduce it for skilled workers without a job offer, the committee concludes. Currently the main way in to the UK for non-EU migrants requires them to have a job. Skilled migrants who come to the UK to take up a job would be allowed to earn £4,400 less than the current £30,000 threshold for non-EU workers, under the proposals.
Skilled migrants who come to the UK to take up a job would be allowed to earn £4,400 less than the current £30,000 threshold, under the proposals. The committee has recommended reducing the existing salary threshold to £25,600 to make it easier for teachers, NHS employees and people at the start of their careers to qualify. The committee recommends higher thresholds for more highly paid occupations.
The committee has recommended reducing the existing salary threshold to £25,600 to make it easier for teachers, NHS employees and people at the start of their careers to qualify. The committee proposes different thresholds depending on the worker’s occupation, with more highly paid occupations having higher thresholds. Manning said: “No perfect system exists and there are unavoidable, difficult trade-offs. The largest impacts will be in low-wage sectors and the government needs to be clear about its plans for lower-skilled work migration.”
The committee also recommends supporting a pilot visa to attract people to work in remote parts of the UK, and improved monitoring of the immigration system to allow the UK to assess whether the new system is working. He warned the government to ensure that the mistakes of previous UK points-based systems were not repeated, noting that the UK did have something “pretty close to an Australian points-based system from 2008 and the current system has evolved away from that because of perceived problems with it”.
Prof Alan Manning, chair of the migration advisory committee, said: “Our recommendations are likely to reduce future growth of the UK population and economy compared with freedom of movement, by using skill and salary thresholds. We estimate very small increases in GDP per capita and productivity, slightly improved public finances, slightly reduced pressures on the NHS, schools and on social housing, though slightly increased pressure on social care.
“No perfect system exists and there are unavoidable, difficult trade-offs. The largest impacts will be in low-wage sectors and the government needs to be clear about its plans for lower-skilled work migration.
“The government should ensure that the mistakes of previous UK points-based systems are not repeated.”
He noted that the UK did have something “pretty close to an Australian points based system from 2008 and the current system has evolved away from that because of perceived problems with it”.
A No 10 spokesman said: “The government will introduce a firmer and fairer points-based immigration system from 2021 that welcomes talent from around the world while reducing low-skilled migrants and bringing overall numbers down. We will carefully consider the report before setting out further details on the new system.”A No 10 spokesman said: “The government will introduce a firmer and fairer points-based immigration system from 2021 that welcomes talent from around the world while reducing low-skilled migrants and bringing overall numbers down. We will carefully consider the report before setting out further details on the new system.”
Asked if this meant the plans for a primarily points-based system would stay, he said: “As the prime minister has been clear, we will introduce our points-based system from 2021.”Asked if this meant the plans for a primarily points-based system would stay, he said: “As the prime minister has been clear, we will introduce our points-based system from 2021.”
An Australian system is based on points being awarded for different characteristics, offsetting strengths in one area against weakness in other areas. Currently the main way in to the UK for non-EU migrants requires you to have a job. The Federation of Small Businesses gave a cautious welcome to the recommendation but proposed that the minimum income threshold be set at around £20,000. “The recommendation for a route to the UK without a job offer is also positive, but this must be open to mid-skilled workers and not restricted to highly paid professionals,” it said.
“We base our recommendations on what we see as being in the interests of the resident population. So we try to focus on how immigration affects people’s lives, so we have never been particularly focused on numbers, it is more do we think they provide a benefit to the UK resident,” Manning told the BBC’s Today programme before the launch of the report. The Food and Drink Federation, whose members rely heavily on EU citizens to staff food production sites where British workers are in short supply, said the salary threshold was still too high. It said it was “a step in the right direction” but urged the government to “consider going further still”.
He said it was impossible to say whether the recommended system would increase the numbers of people migrating to the UK. “That depends on how many points you give and how many points are required for entry so there is no automatic connection between points and numbers. That would be a decision for the government,” he told Today. EU nationals make up a quarter of the 430,000-strong workforce in food and drink manufacturing and many businesses will be recruiting under immigration rules for the first time, said the FDF.
London First, which represents some of the capital’s biggest employers, said it was “positive”. But, like many employers, it believes it is unrealistic to set a salary threshold so high when many businesses rely on recruiting staff who earn less than £25,000 a year, including cleaners, security and waiting staff.