This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/britain-resisting-us-pressure-to-allow-some-huawei-equipment-in-5g-networks/2020/01/28/52e708b4-4145-11ea-99c7-1dfd4241a2fe_story.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Britain, resisting U.S. pressure, to allow some Huawei equipment in 5G networks Britain, resisting U.S. pressure, to allow some Huawei equipment in 5G networks
(about 1 hour later)
LONDON — Britain announced Tuesday that it will allow the Chinese telecom giant Huawei to build "non-core" infrastructure for the country's coming super-fast 5G network, though the company will be designated a "high-risk vendor" with a capped market share. LONDON — The British government announced Tuesday that it plans to allow the Chinese telecom giant Huawei to build "non-core" infrastructure for the country's coming super-fast 5G network, although the company may be designated a "high-risk vendor" with a capped market share.
Britain has been under tremendous pressure from the U.S. government — including calls from President Trump — to ban Huawei from building its 5G communications network. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been under tremendous pressure from the U.S. government — notably from President Trump — to ban Huawei from building Britain’s 5G communications network.
Britain will essentially take a middle path, allowing Huawei to supply and build 5G infrastructure, but ban it from the “core” systems and sensitive government sites. It will also limit its market share to 35 percent. The British government is essentially seeking a middle path, wanting to allow Huawei to supply and build 5G but ban it from “core” systems, including intelligence, military and nuclear sites. It seeks to limit the company’s market share to 35 percent.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been under intense pressure from the Trump administration to ban Huawei outright from the entire network. The United States claims the company poses a security risk and threatens U.S.-British intelligence sharing. The plan to allow Huawei to participate in developing Britain’s 5G network was approved by the country’s National Security Council at a Tuesday meeting chaired by Johnson. The British government will now seek to legislate the proposals through Parliament. It is possible that the House of Commons could amend Johnson’s plan — loosening or strengthening Huawei’s hand. But following a landslide win in the December general election for Johnson and his Conservative Party, Parliament’s ability to challenge government plans has been weakened.
The U.S. government has called Chinese telecom giant Huawei a threat to national security, saying the Chinese government could tap into Huawei equipment to spy on the West or disrupt critical infrastructure. Johnson has been under growing pressure from the Trump administration to ban Huawei outright from the entire network. The United States claims that the Chinese telecom giant poses a security risk and threatens U.S.-British intelligence sharing.
The U.S. government has called Huawei a threat to national security, saying the Chinese government could tap into Huawei equipment to spy on the West or disrupt critical infrastructure.
Pentagon nixes proposal to toughen limits on U.S. sales to HuaweiPentagon nixes proposal to toughen limits on U.S. sales to Huawei
Huawei has dismissed this concern as unfounded and took the decision as a win. Huawei, which has dismissed this concern as unfounded, and described Britain’s announcement Tuesday as a win.
“Huawei is reassured by the U.K. government’s confirmation that we can continue working with our customers to keep the 5G roll-out on track,” said a statement from company Vice President Victor Zhang.“Huawei is reassured by the U.K. government’s confirmation that we can continue working with our customers to keep the 5G roll-out on track,” said a statement from company Vice President Victor Zhang.
“This evidence-based decision will result in a more advanced, more secure and more cost-effective telecoms infrastructure that is fit for the future. It gives the U.K. access to world-leading technology and ensures a competitive market,” the statement added, noting that Huawei had been in Britian for more than 15 years. “This evidence-based decision will result in a more advanced, more secure and more cost-effective telecoms infrastructure that is fit for the future. It gives the U.K. access to world-leading technology and ensures a competitive market,” the statement added, noting that Huawei has been in Britain for more than 15 years.
The United States has been pressing Britain and other key European allies for at least 18 months to bar Huawei from their 5G networks on national security grounds. The United States has been pressing key European allies to bar Huawei from their 5G networks on national security grounds. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tweeted Sunday that Britain had a “momentous decision ahead on 5G.”
The pressure has been both public and private. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tweeted on Sunday that Britain had a “momentous decision ahead on 5G.” On Friday, Trump himself called Johnson to talk about Huawei. On Friday, Trump himself called Johnson to talk about Huawei.
The American pressure has met with mixed results, largely because of concerns that pulling Huawei out of existing 4G networks will be cumbersome and costly. Major providers such as British Telecom are heavily invested in Huawei and Britain does not want to fall behind in the coming 5G world. The American pressure has not won Britain over, largely because of concerns that pulling Huawei out of existing 4G networks will be cumbersome and costly. Major providers such as British Telecom are heavily invested in Huawei technology, and Britain does not want to fall behind in the coming 5G world.
In addition to banning the sale of some U.S. technology to Huawei, Washington has also blocked Huawei from installing telecom equipment in the United States. Japan and Australia have also effectively banned Huawei from their 5G networks.
The coming super-fast 5G networks are expected to power the coming “Internet of Things,” enabling industrial, transport and everyday devices to be connected, to “talk” to each other and to share data constantly, powering future technologies such as driverless cars and smart household appliances.The coming super-fast 5G networks are expected to power the coming “Internet of Things,” enabling industrial, transport and everyday devices to be connected, to “talk” to each other and to share data constantly, powering future technologies such as driverless cars and smart household appliances.
Supporters say 5G may usher in a “fourth industrial revolution.” Critics worry that the systems will allow for widespread spying, data harvesting and loss of privacy.Supporters say 5G may usher in a “fourth industrial revolution.” Critics worry that the systems will allow for widespread spying, data harvesting and loss of privacy.
Britain has long signaled it intended to take a middle path, barring Huawei from government systems and “core” networks that contain routers and switches handling massive volumes of traffic, while allowing the Chinese equipment-maker into the “edge,” where radio antennae connect with user devices. In addition to banning the sale of some U.S. technology to Huawei, Washington has also blocked Huawei from installing telecom equipment in the United States. Japan and Australia have also effectively banned Huawei from their 5G networks.
Britain has long signaled it intended to take a middle way, barring Huawei from government systems and “core” networks that contain routers and switches handling massive volumes of traffic, while allowing the Chinese equipment-maker into the “edge,” where radio antennae connect with user devices.
But the U.S. government has argued that even a limited presence is too much in a 5G network in which, officials say, the distinction between core and edge is virtually meaningless because so much more data can be processed at the network periphery.But the U.S. government has argued that even a limited presence is too much in a 5G network in which, officials say, the distinction between core and edge is virtually meaningless because so much more data can be processed at the network periphery.
Last April, news leaked in London that the Theresa May government had decided to allow a limited role for Huawei in the 5G network. But she resigned as prime minister before the decision was formally announced, leaving it to Johnson to pick up where she left off. As London neared a decision, the Trump administration stepped up its campaign to persuade its ally to bar Huawei. A high-level delegation including deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, special representative for international telecommunications policy Robert Blair and Robert Strayer, deputy assistant secretary of state for cyber and international communications policy, flew to London this month to make their pitch.
As London neared a decision, the Trump administration stepped up its campaign to persuade its ally to bar Huawei. A high-level delegation including Deputy National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger, Special Representative for International Telecommunications Policy Rob Blair and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Cyber Rob Strayer, flew to London this month to make their pitch.
They reiterated their case that having a Chinese company that is beholden to potential Chinese government demands for access would pose not only a surveillance risk but also a threat of network disruption if a conflict escalated. They shared technical information aimed at persuading officials that the national security risks of using Huawei technology could not be adequately mitigated.They reiterated their case that having a Chinese company that is beholden to potential Chinese government demands for access would pose not only a surveillance risk but also a threat of network disruption if a conflict escalated. They shared technical information aimed at persuading officials that the national security risks of using Huawei technology could not be adequately mitigated.
The American delegation stressed that if Britain were to let Huawei into its 5G network, the U.S. government would have to reassess whether the British could sufficiently protect intelligence being shared. The U.S. delegation stressed that if Britain were to let Huawei into its 5G network, the U.S. government would have to reassess whether the British could sufficiently protect shared intelligence.
Huawei helped bring Internet to small-town America. Now its equipment has to go.Huawei helped bring Internet to small-town America. Now its equipment has to go.
The British were not persuaded, according to several individuals familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak for the record. Also amping up the pressure is the U.S. Congress. A group of Republican lawmakers this month introduced legislation that would bar U.S. intelligence-sharing with any country that allows Huawei into its 5G network. Although it is not expected to pass — at least not in current form — the threat sends a signal that Congress does not intend to sit on the sidelines on the issue.
Also amping up the pressure is the U.S. Congress. A group of Republican lawmakers this month introduced legislation that would bar U.S. intelligence-sharing with any country that allows Huawei into its 5G network. Though it’s not expected to pass — at least not in current form — the threat sends a signal that Congress does not intend to sit on the sidelines on the issue. British lawmakers, industry lobbyists and privacy activists are themselves divided. Intelligence officials last March delivered a scathing assessment of the security risks posed by Huawei in telecom networks, saying they found “significant technical issues” in the firm’s engineering processes as well as “concerning issues” in its software.
British intelligence officials last March delivered a scathing assessment of the security risks posed by Huawei in telecom networks, saying they found “significant technical issues” in the firm’s engineering processes as well as “concerning issues” in its software. Many European countries, including Britain, have long used Huawei gear in their 3G and 4G networks.
At the same time, the British intelligence officials said they have “strict controls” for how Huawei equipment is deployed. They said that the 5G networks will be governed by three “preconditions”: higher cybersecurity standards, resilience — or being able minimize disruptions if a system is exploited — and diversity. British officials and lawmakers wrestled with the decision for more than a year, with some signaling skepticism about a full ban. In a June speech, the head of Britain’s National Cyber Security Center, Ciaran Martin, said the country needed to consider a broad range of threats.
Many European countries, including the Britain, have long used Huawei gear in their 3G and 4G networks, but they’ve come under intense U.S. pressure to exclude Huawei from 5G. “The most significant attack on U.K. [telecommunications] in recent years that we know of was Russian, and we don’t have any Russian-owned or -flagged kit in our [telecommunications] networks,” he said.
British officials and lawmakers wrestled with the decision for more than a year, with some signaling skepticism about a full ban. In a June speech, the head of Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre, Ciaran Martin, said the country needed to consider a broad range of threats. Last summer, Parliament’s Science and Technology Committee said Britain should ban Huawei from the most sensitive, core operations of its 5G network. It said it saw no technical grounds for completely excluding the Chinese company’s gear, although it added there could be “geopolitical or ethical grounds for the government to decide to enact a ban.”
“The most significant attack on U.K. telcos in recent years that we know of was Russian, and we don’t have any Russian owned or flagged kit in our telco networks,” he said.
Last summer, the British Parliament’s Science and Technology committee said Britain should ban Huawei from the most sensitive, core operations of its 5G network. It said it saw no technical grounds for completely excluding the Chinese company’s gear, though it added there could be “geopolitical or ethical grounds for the government to decide to enact a ban.”
The British decision comes as a host of other countries, including Germany and Brazil, continue to debate Huawei’s role in their 5G networks.The British decision comes as a host of other countries, including Germany and Brazil, continue to debate Huawei’s role in their 5G networks.
Next few months may show if Huawei can thrive without U.S. tech salesNext few months may show if Huawei can thrive without U.S. tech sales
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has publicly rejected the idea of banning any company “simply because it’s from a certain country,” and is seen as reluctant to alienate either China or the United States, two large buyers of German cars and machinery. But German intelligence officials and some members of Merkel’s own party have pushed for a tougher stance against Huawei, sparking a fiery debate that has delayed a final decision. In Brussels, European Union policymakers are set to unveil a set of draft guidelines Wednesday that would give E.U. countries the tools to exclude Huawei from their networks should they choose to do so.
The E.U. has been skeptical of the role of Huawei in the development of 5G networks, but it lacks the ability to ban the Chinese company across the bloc. Instead, individual capitals make the decisions, giving Beijing greater leverage to pressure countries.
The possibility that Huawei could expand its role in European networks has unsettled U.S. security experts. U.S. intelligence agencies may restrict the information they share with their European counterparts, for instance — even in the case of the British, with whom they have a closer relationship than with any other foreign power.
“I would imagine it would have a dampening effect on the willingness to share certain things,” Ben Hodges, the former commander of U.S. Army Europe, said of the British decision.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has publicly rejected the idea of banning any company “simply because it’s from a certain country,” and she is seen as reluctant to alienate either China or the United States, two large buyers of German cars and machinery. But German intelligence officials and some members of Merkel’s own party have pushed for a tougher stance against Huawei, sparking a fiery debate that has delayed a final decision.
Germany’s Foreign Office, Interior Ministry and intelligence services “all emphasize the risks of Huawei,” while “the Federal Chancellery and Ministry for Economic Affairs are against a ban,” researchers with the German Council on Foreign Relations wrote in a recent report.Germany’s Foreign Office, Interior Ministry and intelligence services “all emphasize the risks of Huawei,” while “the Federal Chancellery and Ministry for Economic Affairs are against a ban,” researchers with the German Council on Foreign Relations wrote in a recent report.
In December, China’s ambassador to Berlin, Ken Wu, warned there could be “consequences” for Germany if it excludes Huawei. Speaking at a forum hosted by the newspaper Handelsblatt, Wu noted Germany sells millions of cars a year in China, the world’s largest auto market. In December, China’s ambassador to Berlin, Ken Wu, warned there could be “consequences” for Germany if it excludes Huawei. Speaking at a forum hosted by the newspaper Handelsblatt, Wu noted that Germany sells millions of cars a year in China, the world’s largest auto market.
“Could we say one day that the German cars are not safe because we are able to manufacture our own cars?” he said. “No. That is pure protectionism.”“Could we say one day that the German cars are not safe because we are able to manufacture our own cars?” he said. “No. That is pure protectionism.”
Nakashima and Whalen reported from Washington. Nakashima and Whalen reported from Washington. Michael Birnbaum in Brussels contributed to this report.
China’s Huawei may need two to three years to recover from U.S. trade ban, CEO saysChina’s Huawei may need two to three years to recover from U.S. trade ban, CEO says
When hunger for fast Internet collides with U.S. concerns about Chinese spyingWhen hunger for fast Internet collides with U.S. concerns about Chinese spying
Will U.S. war on Huawei help China end its dependency on Western tech?Will U.S. war on Huawei help China end its dependency on Western tech?
Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the worldToday’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world
Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign newsLike Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news