This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-51643086

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Greggs paper bag lands student in court on littering charge, 11 years later Greggs paper bag lands student in court on littering charge, 11 years later
(32 minutes later)
More than 10 years ago, Grace Firth tucked into a snack from Greggs.More than 10 years ago, Grace Firth tucked into a snack from Greggs.
Somehow, the paper bag ended up on the ground rather than in the bin.Somehow, the paper bag ended up on the ground rather than in the bin.
Now the 32-year-old student from Stockport has ended up in court, accused of littering. Now the 32-year-old student from Stockport has found herself in court, accused of littering.
Magistrates even questioned whether the date of the offence was a mistake because of how long ago it happened.Magistrates even questioned whether the date of the offence was a mistake because of how long ago it happened.
It took so long to be resolved because Grace said she knew nothing about the original prosecution.It took so long to be resolved because Grace said she knew nothing about the original prosecution.
She had been convicted in her absence in August 2009, fined £175 and ordered to pay £180 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.She had been convicted in her absence in August 2009, fined £175 and ordered to pay £180 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.
But Grace told Stockport Magistrates' Court the first she'd heard about the whole thing was when she got a letter on 8 December 2019 regarding an "historical debt".But Grace told Stockport Magistrates' Court the first she'd heard about the whole thing was when she got a letter on 8 December 2019 regarding an "historical debt".
She said she had never received any letters before then, since they had been sent to her mum's house.She said she had never received any letters before then, since they had been sent to her mum's house.
"Any mail for me was returned to sender or thrown away," she told the court."Any mail for me was returned to sender or thrown away," she told the court.
On Tuesday, magistrates accepted her explanation and decided to cancel the original £180 costs order.On Tuesday, magistrates accepted her explanation and decided to cancel the original £180 costs order.
Chairman Edward Tasker told her: "You've been very fair and very honest," before also reducing her fine to £40 plus the £15 victim surcharge.Chairman Edward Tasker told her: "You've been very fair and very honest," before also reducing her fine to £40 plus the £15 victim surcharge.
"Thank you for being so honest and for turning up," he added."Thank you for being so honest and for turning up," he added.