This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/europe/germany-afd.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Germany Designates Part of Far-Right AfD Party ‘Extremist’ Germany Designates Part of Far-Right AfD Party ‘Extremist’
(about 4 hours later)
BERLIN — Germany’s domestic intelligence agency on Thursday officially classified one part of the far-right Alternative for Germany party as extremist, opening the door to place some of its most influential leaders under surveillance. BERLIN — Germany’s domestic intelligence agency on Thursday officially classified a part of the far-right Alternative for Germany party as extremist, opening the door to place some of its most influential leaders under surveillance.
The decision focuses on a movement inside the party run by the notorious far-right firebrand, Björn Höcke, who has a well-documented history of systematically targeting migrants and liberal values, and playing down the Holocaust. The decision places the Alternative for Germany’s wing in the state of Thuringia under the new designation. It has a long history of contentious tactics, including systematically targeting migrants and playing down the Holocaust, and is run by one of the group’s most notorious far-right firebrands, Björn Höcke.
Thomas Haldenwang, the president of the intelligence agency, said in a news conference that the goals of Mr. Höcke’s wing of the party, known in fact as the “Wing,” were “not compatible with the Constitution.” Thomas Haldenwang, president of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, said the goals of Mr. Höcke’s wing of the Alternative for Germany were “not compatible with the Constitution.”
“The Wing has to be classified as having far-right extremist ambitions,” Mr. Haldenwang said. He added, “The wing has to be classified as having far-right extremist ambitions.”
The Wing comprises an estimated 7,000 activists across the country or about one in five members of the Alternative for Germany. They are now part of 32,000 known far-right extremists listed by the intelligence agency. The Thuringia section of the party will now be listed as a far-right extremist group in the agency’s intelligence report.
Calls to place the entire party, known by its German acronym AfD, under observation have grown louder after a series of far-right terrorist attacks linked to the kind of rhetoric embraced by the party. Last month, a gunman murdered nine people with immigrant roots in the southwestern city of Hanau. Calls to place the entire Alternative for Germany, known by its German initials, AfD, under observation have grown louder after a series of far-right terrorist attacks linked to the kind of rhetoric embraced by the party, most recently the shooting of nine Germans with immigrant roots in the southwestern city of Hanau in February.
Those killings were the latest in a series of far-right attacks at a time when the country’s democratic institutions face growing distrust and the political landscape has become fractured. Those killings were the latest in a series of far-right attacks at a time when the country’s democratic institutions face growing distrust and its politics have been fractured by the rise of the likes of Alternative for Germany.
“We know from German history that far-right extremism hasn’t just destroyed human lives, it destroyed democracy,” Mr. Haldenwang said. “Far right extremism and far-right terrorism are currently the biggest danger for democracy in Germany.” “We know from German history that far-right extremism hasn’t just destroyed human lives; it destroyed democracy,” Mr. Haldenwang said. “Far-right extremism and far-right terrorism are currently the biggest danger for democracy in Germany.”
For now, the action against the Thuringia wing of the AfD, which is the biggest opposition party in Parliament at the national level, is considered a “test case,” officials said.