This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/mar/23/jury-trials-put-on-hold-in-england-and-wales-coronavirus

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Jury trials on hold in England and Wales due to coronavirus fears Jury trials on hold in England and Wales due to coronavirus fears
(about 1 hour later)
No new trials will start and ongoing trials will be paused to help stop spread of Covid-19No new trials will start and ongoing trials will be paused to help stop spread of Covid-19
All jury trials in England and Wales are being temporarily suspended because of the risk of spreading coronavirus infections, the lord chief justice has announced.All jury trials in England and Wales are being temporarily suspended because of the risk of spreading coronavirus infections, the lord chief justice has announced.
The decision by Lord Burnett of Maldon follows complaints about the safety of continuing with physical court hearings while the rest of the economy shuts down.The decision by Lord Burnett of Maldon follows complaints about the safety of continuing with physical court hearings while the rest of the economy shuts down.
In his statement, the head of the judiciary, said: “I have decided that we need to pause jury trials for a short time to enable appropriate precautions to be put in place.In his statement, the head of the judiciary, said: “I have decided that we need to pause jury trials for a short time to enable appropriate precautions to be put in place.
Burnett said: “As the prime minister has been telling the country, the spread of Covid-19 has continued to accelerate. “The clear message from government is to take all precautions to avoid unnecessary contact.Burnett said: “As the prime minister has been telling the country, the spread of Covid-19 has continued to accelerate. “The clear message from government is to take all precautions to avoid unnecessary contact.
“A review of the arrangements in our courts is called for. I have decided that we need to pause jury trials for a short time to enable appropriate precautions to be put in place.”“A review of the arrangements in our courts is called for. I have decided that we need to pause jury trials for a short time to enable appropriate precautions to be put in place.”
Burnett said arrangements had been made to conduct as many hearings as possible using telephone, video and other technology, and that the HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) was “working round the clock” on these new measures.Burnett said arrangements had been made to conduct as many hearings as possible using telephone, video and other technology, and that the HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) was “working round the clock” on these new measures.
But he said some hearings, “the most obvious being jury trials”, could not be carried out remotely.But he said some hearings, “the most obvious being jury trials”, could not be carried out remotely.
He said: “My unequivocal position is that no jury trials or other physical hearings can take place unless it is safe for them to do so.He said: “My unequivocal position is that no jury trials or other physical hearings can take place unless it is safe for them to do so.
“Today no new trials are to start. Jurors summoned for this week are to be released, if possible without entering the building, and told that they will be asked to return for trials where specific arrangements to ensure safety have been put in place.“Today no new trials are to start. Jurors summoned for this week are to be released, if possible without entering the building, and told that they will be asked to return for trials where specific arrangements to ensure safety have been put in place.
“All other hearings in the crown court that can lawfully take place remotely should do so.”“All other hearings in the crown court that can lawfully take place remotely should do so.”
The judge said jury trials that have already started should continue if possible, with strict social distancing procedures “at all times and at all places within the court building”.The judge said jury trials that have already started should continue if possible, with strict social distancing procedures “at all times and at all places within the court building”.
He also said ongoing trials must be adjourned, if necessary, to allow these safety measures to be put in place.He also said ongoing trials must be adjourned, if necessary, to allow these safety measures to be put in place.
Burnett added: “Considerable imagination and flexibility may be needed to achieve that. This is already happening in some crown courts.Burnett added: “Considerable imagination and flexibility may be needed to achieve that. This is already happening in some crown courts.
“HMCTS will continue to work to ensure that safety measures are in place in all parts of the court building in which trials are already taking place. The basic hygiene arrangements urged upon us by the prime minister must be available.“HMCTS will continue to work to ensure that safety measures are in place in all parts of the court building in which trials are already taking place. The basic hygiene arrangements urged upon us by the prime minister must be available.
“Resident judges, with their staff, will determine whether a trial can safely be continued. If it is necessary to adjourn trials already under way for a short period to put those safety measures in place, this must be done.”“Resident judges, with their staff, will determine whether a trial can safely be continued. If it is necessary to adjourn trials already under way for a short period to put those safety measures in place, this must be done.”
Burnett said the same considerations will apply to magistrates courts, which will need to continue to deal with urgent work, and that hearings should take place remotely if the facilities exist.Burnett said the same considerations will apply to magistrates courts, which will need to continue to deal with urgent work, and that hearings should take place remotely if the facilities exist.
Regarding the civil and family courts, where some hearings were held over Skype last week, he said physical hearings should only take place if a remote hearing was not possible and if suitable safety arrangements coud be made.Regarding the civil and family courts, where some hearings were held over Skype last week, he said physical hearings should only take place if a remote hearing was not possible and if suitable safety arrangements coud be made.
Objections to continuing hearings in traditional ways had been growing. On Sunday evening, western circuit barristers tweeted: “Another week in the justice system will begin tomorrow with in person hearings going ahead against objections and more than 30 people routinely being held in the same room against their will.”Objections to continuing hearings in traditional ways had been growing. On Sunday evening, western circuit barristers tweeted: “Another week in the justice system will begin tomorrow with in person hearings going ahead against objections and more than 30 people routinely being held in the same room against their will.”
The decision on whether any trial or hearing is safe to conduct appears now to be down to individual judges. Burnett said: “Resident judges, with HMCTS staff, will determine whether a trial can safely be continued.”The decision on whether any trial or hearing is safe to conduct appears now to be down to individual judges. Burnett said: “Resident judges, with HMCTS staff, will determine whether a trial can safely be continued.”
He said the guidance would be updated as events continued to unfold.He said the guidance would be updated as events continued to unfold.
In a sign that hearings are unlikely to resume in any number a for a long time, Caroline Goodwin QC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, said: “The political pressure to keep courts open is unacceptable, not least given their previous neglect and the lack of concern for any of the endemic delays or issues in the criminal justice system.
“Within the recent past there was no care for the removal of cases from the criminal lists. Now there is an unacceptable pressure to press on regardless. That in simple terms is wrong, is dangerous and fails to exercise any duty of care to court users. When, and only when, it is safe, can hearings be resumed.”