This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/nhs-frontline-staff-may-refuse-to-work-over-lack-of-coronavirus-ppe-says-union-unison

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
NHS frontline staff may walk out over lack of PPE, say unions NHS frontline staff may walk out over lack of PPE, say unions
(about 1 hour later)
Warning from Unison and Unite comes after workers told to reuse disposable equipmentWarning from Unison and Unite comes after workers told to reuse disposable equipment
NHS staff may refuse to work if there is not enough personal protective equipment to ensure their safety, unions have said. NHS staff may refuse to work if there is not enough personal protective equipment to ensure their safety, unions and professional bodies have said.
The warnings came in response to new guidance from Public Health England (PHE), revealed by the Guardian on Friday, which instructs healthcare workers to reuse disposable PPE. The guidelines also recommended that medics wear aprons if they are unable to access full-length gowns, and there are concerns that some PPE supplies are close to running out.The warnings came in response to new guidance from Public Health England (PHE), revealed by the Guardian on Friday, which instructs healthcare workers to reuse disposable PPE. The guidelines also recommended that medics wear aprons if they are unable to access full-length gowns, and there are concerns that some PPE supplies are close to running out.
Sara Gorton, the head of health at Unison, said: “If gowns run out, staff in high-risk areas may well decide that it’s no longer safe for them to work.Sara Gorton, the head of health at Unison, said: “If gowns run out, staff in high-risk areas may well decide that it’s no longer safe for them to work.
“No part of the NHS should use this move as an excuse to ration supplies of gowns when they still have stocks. That would cause a damaging breakdown of trust at a time when staff are working under intense pressure.”“No part of the NHS should use this move as an excuse to ration supplies of gowns when they still have stocks. That would cause a damaging breakdown of trust at a time when staff are working under intense pressure.”
Unite’s assistant general secretary, Gail Cartmail, also said the union had advised healthcare staff to refuse to work if they felt they were not being protected from the virus. The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) has also advised surgeons not to risk their health by working without adequate personal protective equipment, and said it was deeply disturbed by changes to official guidance.Professor Neil Mortensen, RCS’s president-elect, said the implication that surgeons may not require adequate PPE was “simply unacceptable”, and that all doctors were committed to their patients and “many will put themselves in the firing line” during the crisis.
He echoed advice from the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) that nurses should refuse to treat patients as a last resort if they are not provided with adequate equipment. “If fluid repellent gowns or coveralls are not available, then surgeons should not risk their health,” he said in a statement.
Unite’s assistant general secretary, Gail Cartmail, said the union had advised healthcare staff to refuse to work if they felt they were not being protected from the virus.
“Unite has already advised its 100,000 members that reluctantly NHS and social care staff could legitimately and lawfully decline to put themselves in further danger and risk of injury at work,” she said. “The continued lack of PPE is a national scandal and the government’s litany of broken promises over the last month is shameful.”“Unite has already advised its 100,000 members that reluctantly NHS and social care staff could legitimately and lawfully decline to put themselves in further danger and risk of injury at work,” she said. “The continued lack of PPE is a national scandal and the government’s litany of broken promises over the last month is shameful.”
Cartmail said the health secretary, Matt Hancock, may have to consider his position if he was not able to secure the necessary PPE. She said the situation could not continue, and that health professionals would be quite right to decline to put themselves in danger.Cartmail said the health secretary, Matt Hancock, may have to consider his position if he was not able to secure the necessary PPE. She said the situation could not continue, and that health professionals would be quite right to decline to put themselves in danger.
“We are not just talking about NHS staff in hospitals, but those working in the community, such as health visitors and community nurses, and those employed in social care settings, such as care homes,” she said.“We are not just talking about NHS staff in hospitals, but those working in the community, such as health visitors and community nurses, and those employed in social care settings, such as care homes,” she said.
The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) published guidance for its members last week, assuring them that if they “refuse to treat for lack of PPE, and are criticised subsequently, the RCN will provide you with legal representation and other support in any proceedings that ensue, without judgment”.The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) published guidance for its members last week, assuring them that if they “refuse to treat for lack of PPE, and are criticised subsequently, the RCN will provide you with legal representation and other support in any proceedings that ensue, without judgment”.
It acknowledges that criticism could have legal consequences, including dismissal. The guidance says that under employment law, if there are “circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent and which they could not reasonably have been expected to avert”, they cannot be fairly dismissed.It acknowledges that criticism could have legal consequences, including dismissal. The guidance says that under employment law, if there are “circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent and which they could not reasonably have been expected to avert”, they cannot be fairly dismissed.
An RCN spokesperson said: “For nursing staff, this will go against every instinct. But their safety must not be compromised. As the RCN, we offer support and guidance on the steps nursing staff can take before coming to that judgment. Nursing staff are extremely determined and the public can be reassured by that.”An RCN spokesperson said: “For nursing staff, this will go against every instinct. But their safety must not be compromised. As the RCN, we offer support and guidance on the steps nursing staff can take before coming to that judgment. Nursing staff are extremely determined and the public can be reassured by that.”
The GMB union refused to be drawn on whether its members would walk out if they felt unprotected, but the national secretary, Rehana Azam, said it was “advising all members to contact us if they feel as though their health and safety is being put at risk due to lack of PPE”.The GMB union refused to be drawn on whether its members would walk out if they felt unprotected, but the national secretary, Rehana Azam, said it was “advising all members to contact us if they feel as though their health and safety is being put at risk due to lack of PPE”.
The union said it had written to the government “stating in the strongest possible terms” the need to protect frontline workers.The union said it had written to the government “stating in the strongest possible terms” the need to protect frontline workers.
The GMB national officer Rachel Harrison accused the government of being too slow to release a PPE plan and of hastily redrawing PPE guidance, describing the process as a “litany of failure”.The GMB national officer Rachel Harrison accused the government of being too slow to release a PPE plan and of hastily redrawing PPE guidance, describing the process as a “litany of failure”.
“NHS and ambulance staff will now face unacceptable risks as a result of gross ministerial incompetence. We won’t let this go unchallenged and will now review the steps we need to take to protect our members,” she said.“NHS and ambulance staff will now face unacceptable risks as a result of gross ministerial incompetence. We won’t let this go unchallenged and will now review the steps we need to take to protect our members,” she said.
The new guidelines mark a U-turn on original guidance that full-length waterproof surgical gowns should be worn during high-risk procedures.The new guidelines mark a U-turn on original guidance that full-length waterproof surgical gowns should be worn during high-risk procedures.
More than 50 frontline healthcare workers have died of coronavirus, as concerns mount that they are not being adequately protected while working with Covid-19 patients.More than 50 frontline healthcare workers have died of coronavirus, as concerns mount that they are not being adequately protected while working with Covid-19 patients.
Hancock, admitted to MPs on the Commons health and social care select committee on Friday that the NHS was “tight on gowns”, describing it as a “pressure point”.Hancock, admitted to MPs on the Commons health and social care select committee on Friday that the NHS was “tight on gowns”, describing it as a “pressure point”.
About 55,000 gowns were due to be delivered on Friday, but the NHS is using about 150,000 a day.About 55,000 gowns were due to be delivered on Friday, but the NHS is using about 150,000 a day.