This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-triumph-of-experience-over-hope/2020/05/12/abca343c-947f-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_homepage
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| The triumph of experience over hope | The triumph of experience over hope |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| If second marriage is “the triumph of hope over experience,” then the covid-19 crisis has proved to be the triumph of experience over hope. | If second marriage is “the triumph of hope over experience,” then the covid-19 crisis has proved to be the triumph of experience over hope. |
| For much of March and April, there was broad agreement among pundits, wonks and public health researchers that the United States needed to “cancel everything,” as Yascha Mounk put it in the Atlantic. Initially, the idea was to “flatten the curve,” spreading out the number of cases over time so that hospitals never got overwhelmed. But as death rates in Italy and Spain reached horrifying levels, the consensus began shifting toward to a tougher goal. | For much of March and April, there was broad agreement among pundits, wonks and public health researchers that the United States needed to “cancel everything,” as Yascha Mounk put it in the Atlantic. Initially, the idea was to “flatten the curve,” spreading out the number of cases over time so that hospitals never got overwhelmed. But as death rates in Italy and Spain reached horrifying levels, the consensus began shifting toward to a tougher goal. |
| Full coverage of the coronavirus pandemic | Full coverage of the coronavirus pandemic |
| Instead of trying to manage the pace of infections, some of those experts started talking about limiting the total number of cases. They wanted to use lockdowns to reduce infections to something like the low levels seen in Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong — and then keep them down with the kind of aggressive programs those countries use to keep their economies open without triggering an epidemic. | Instead of trying to manage the pace of infections, some of those experts started talking about limiting the total number of cases. They wanted to use lockdowns to reduce infections to something like the low levels seen in Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong — and then keep them down with the kind of aggressive programs those countries use to keep their economies open without triggering an epidemic. |
| That would mean a combination of hygiene measures in public spaces (masks, temperature checks, capacity reductions and profligate use of hand sanitizer) and a robust public health operation. Those health efforts would involve testing widely to identify new cases, tracing an infected person’s contacts over the preceding weeks, and isolating those infected and exposed through some combination of in-home or central quarantine. | That would mean a combination of hygiene measures in public spaces (masks, temperature checks, capacity reductions and profligate use of hand sanitizer) and a robust public health operation. Those health efforts would involve testing widely to identify new cases, tracing an infected person’s contacts over the preceding weeks, and isolating those infected and exposed through some combination of in-home or central quarantine. |
| For about a month, I was hopeful that we could achieve a “South Korea solution.” Unfortunately, it’s become clear that we’ve failed. The metric set early on for ending lockdowns — 14 days of declining caseloads — was probably not aggressive enough to make a test/trace/isolate strategy viable in a country with such widespread outbreaks. But that’s moot, anyway, as states have begun opening up without hitting even that weak target or having built the kind of public health tools needed to hunt the virus to extinction. | For about a month, I was hopeful that we could achieve a “South Korea solution.” Unfortunately, it’s become clear that we’ve failed. The metric set early on for ending lockdowns — 14 days of declining caseloads — was probably not aggressive enough to make a test/trace/isolate strategy viable in a country with such widespread outbreaks. But that’s moot, anyway, as states have begun opening up without hitting even that weak target or having built the kind of public health tools needed to hunt the virus to extinction. |
| I should have predicted this. I am a libertarian, and libertarians expect large government efforts to fail. I have written previously about the peculiar inability of American governmental institutions to do things that seem to work abroad. Obviously, it’s possible for a government to keep covid-19 at bay, if not entirely under control. But I allowed my hope to overwhelm my natural skepticism. | I should have predicted this. I am a libertarian, and libertarians expect large government efforts to fail. I have written previously about the peculiar inability of American governmental institutions to do things that seem to work abroad. Obviously, it’s possible for a government to keep covid-19 at bay, if not entirely under control. But I allowed my hope to overwhelm my natural skepticism. |
| Mine aren’t the only hopes dashed: Experience has triumphed over hope almost everywhere. Look again at the countries widely applauded for preventing an epidemic despite trade with China that should have seeded many outbreaks. What do Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong have in common? They are close to China, and they lived through the SARS outbreak in the early 2000s. | Mine aren’t the only hopes dashed: Experience has triumphed over hope almost everywhere. Look again at the countries widely applauded for preventing an epidemic despite trade with China that should have seeded many outbreaks. What do Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong have in common? They are close to China, and they lived through the SARS outbreak in the early 2000s. |
| The countries that survived SARS had a playbook ready to haul out when the next epidemic hit. The countries that SARS bypassed also relied on experience, in a way, but that experience had taught them to hope that pandemics were something peculiar to Asia or Africa or other places where Everything Is Different. Running that playbook against this coronavirus turned out to be disastrous. | The countries that survived SARS had a playbook ready to haul out when the next epidemic hit. The countries that SARS bypassed also relied on experience, in a way, but that experience had taught them to hope that pandemics were something peculiar to Asia or Africa or other places where Everything Is Different. Running that playbook against this coronavirus turned out to be disastrous. |
| To be fair, for all the problems with U.S. institutions, America’s outbreak thus far hasn’t been unusually bad. With about 250 deaths per million citizens, we’re solidly in the middle of the pack. The United States is underperforming Germany and Canada but roughly on par with Switzerland, and we’re doing significantly better than France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Britain. | To be fair, for all the problems with U.S. institutions, America’s outbreak thus far hasn’t been unusually bad. With about 250 deaths per million citizens, we’re solidly in the middle of the pack. The United States is underperforming Germany and Canada but roughly on par with Switzerland, and we’re doing significantly better than France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Britain. |
| This suggests that America didn’t try to live on hope because there’s something especially wrong with our institutions, or with President Trump. And as securities lawyer Jeremy Senderowicz recently pointed out, one U.S. institution did have a playbook built in a previous crisis: the Federal Reserve. Not coincidentally, the Fed is the American institution that acted most swiftly and effectively in recent months. | This suggests that America didn’t try to live on hope because there’s something especially wrong with our institutions, or with President Trump. And as securities lawyer Jeremy Senderowicz recently pointed out, one U.S. institution did have a playbook built in a previous crisis: the Federal Reserve. Not coincidentally, the Fed is the American institution that acted most swiftly and effectively in recent months. |
| The Opinions section is looking for stories of how the coronavirus has affected people of all walks of life. Write to us. | The Opinions section is looking for stories of how the coronavirus has affected people of all walks of life. Write to us. |
| However, it’s not quite an excuse to say that everyone is bad at learning from the experience of others and that our country had a lot of company in this particular cognitive error. For there are countries that learned from the experience of others, notably Germany. Like us, Germany is large and rich and has a bustling trade with China. Moreover, Germany’s political framework also gives local governments significant autonomy. Yet Germany’s death rate is only about a third of ours, and declining, while the United States seems stuck on a high plateau. | However, it’s not quite an excuse to say that everyone is bad at learning from the experience of others and that our country had a lot of company in this particular cognitive error. For there are countries that learned from the experience of others, notably Germany. Like us, Germany is large and rich and has a bustling trade with China. Moreover, Germany’s political framework also gives local governments significant autonomy. Yet Germany’s death rate is only about a third of ours, and declining, while the United States seems stuck on a high plateau. |
| In fact, death rates are declining sharply in most of the countries I mentioned, except for Canada and the United States. And here is America’s real problem with hope over experience: Many places are rushing to reopen without having done the work to control the disease. It’s understandable if a country that hasn’t weathered a serious pandemic in a century needed to learn what to do from hard experience. But it’s starting to look like we still haven’t, and won’t, unless that experience gets harder still. | |
| Read more from Megan McArdle’s archive, follow her on Twitter or subscribe to her updates on Facebook. | Read more from Megan McArdle’s archive, follow her on Twitter or subscribe to her updates on Facebook. |
| Read more: | Read more: |
| Kathleen Parker: Why reopening protests reminiscent of the tea party era are fizzling | Kathleen Parker: Why reopening protests reminiscent of the tea party era are fizzling |
| The Post’s View: The coronavirus spreads in close quarters. That should factor into reopening decisions. | The Post’s View: The coronavirus spreads in close quarters. That should factor into reopening decisions. |
| Irwin Redlener and Karen B. Redlener: Today’s children are the pandemic generation. For millions, the future is now grim. | Irwin Redlener and Karen B. Redlener: Today’s children are the pandemic generation. For millions, the future is now grim. |
| The Post’s View: The patchwork of state reopenings is a deadly game of trial and error | The Post’s View: The patchwork of state reopenings is a deadly game of trial and error |
| Leana S. Wen: Six flaws in the arguments for reopening | Leana S. Wen: Six flaws in the arguments for reopening |
Previous version
1
Next version