This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-52646688

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Gerry Adams wins appeal against prison escape convictions Gerry Adams wins appeal against Maze Prison escape convictions
(32 minutes later)
Gerry Adams has won his appeal to have two convictions for attempting to escape from prison overturned. Gerry Adams has won his appeal to have two convictions for attempting to escape from prison in the 1970s overturned.
The Supreme Court said the former Sinn Féin president's convictions were quashed because Mr Adams detention was unlawful. The Supreme Court said the former Sinn Féin president's convictions were quashed because Mr Adams' detention was unlawful.
He attempted to escape from the Maze Prison, also known as Long Kesh internment camp, on Christmas Eve 1973 and again in July 1974. He attempted to escape from the Maze Prison, also known as Long Kesh internment camp, in 1973 and 1974.
He was later sentenced to a total of four-and-a-half years in jail.He was later sentenced to a total of four-and-a-half years in jail.
Mr Adams was in jail because he had been interned without trial, a practice that was introduced in Northern Ireland amid spiralling violence in the early 1970s.
More than 1,900 people suspected of being members of paramilitary organisations were detained, but many were arrested based on flawed intelligence.
Mr Adams has consistently denied being a member of the IRA.
'Other internees'
The former Sinn Féin leader welcomed the Supreme Court's decision, saying internment without trial "set aside the normal principles of law and was based on a blunt and brutal piece of coercive legislation".
"There is an onus on the British government to identify and inform other internees whose internment may also have been unlawful," he said.
At an earlier hearing in November, Mr Adams' lawyers argued his detention was unlawful because the interim custody order (ICO) used to detain him in July 1973 was not authorised by Willie Whitelaw, who was Northern Ireland secretary at the time.At an earlier hearing in November, Mr Adams' lawyers argued his detention was unlawful because the interim custody order (ICO) used to detain him in July 1973 was not authorised by Willie Whitelaw, who was Northern Ireland secretary at the time.
Announcing the Supreme Court's judgement at a remote hearing on Wednesday, Lord Kerr - the former Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland - said the court had unanimously allowed Mr Adams' appeal and had quashed his convictions.Announcing the Supreme Court's judgement at a remote hearing on Wednesday, Lord Kerr - the former Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland - said the court had unanimously allowed Mr Adams' appeal and had quashed his convictions.
The judge said Mr Adams' detention was unlawful because it had not been "considered personally" by Mr Whitelaw.The judge said Mr Adams' detention was unlawful because it had not been "considered personally" by Mr Whitelaw.
He explained that Mr Adams, a former West Belfast MP, had been detained under an ICO made under the Detention of Terrorists (Northern Ireland) Order 1972 and that "such an order could be made where the secretary of state considered that an individual was involved in terrorism".He explained that Mr Adams, a former West Belfast MP, had been detained under an ICO made under the Detention of Terrorists (Northern Ireland) Order 1972 and that "such an order could be made where the secretary of state considered that an individual was involved in terrorism".
Mr Adams has consistently denied being a member of the IRA.
In the court's written judgment, Lord Kerr said the power to make such an order was "a momentous one", describing it as "a power to detain without trial and potentially for a limitless period".In the court's written judgment, Lord Kerr said the power to make such an order was "a momentous one", describing it as "a power to detain without trial and potentially for a limitless period".
He added: "This provides an insight into Parliament's intention and that the intention was that such a crucial decision should be made by the secretary of state." "This provides an insight into Parliament's intention and that the intention was that such a crucial decision should be made by the secretary of state," he said.