This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/michael-flynns-attorneys-appeal-court-order-that-allows-outside-groups-retired-federal-judge-to-argue-against-tossing-guilty-plea/2020/05/19/9e8e014c-99dc-11ea-a282-386f56d579e6_story.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Michael Flynn’s attorneys appeal court order that allows outside groups, retired federal judge to argue against tossing guilty plea Michael Flynn’s attorneys have asked an appeals court to order a federal judge to dismiss the former national security adviser’s conviction
(32 minutes later)
Michael Flynn’s attorneys have appealed a court’s orders allowing outside groups and a retired federal judge to argue against the Justice Department’s bid to dismiss the former Trump national security adviser’s conviction of lying to the FBI. Michael Flynn’s attorneys have asked a U.S. appeals court in Washington to order a federal judge to dismiss the conviction of President Trump’s former national security adviser. Flynn’s laywers also asked the appeals court to reverse the judge’s order allowing outside groups and a retired federal judge to argue against the Justice Department’s request to toss the case.
U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan last week paused the case to hear from interested parties in the case and appointed former New York federal judge John Gleeson to argue against the department request. Sullivan also asked Gleeson to examine whether the former three-star general may have committed perjury in the process of pleading guilty to lying about his pre-inauguration contacts with Russia’s ambassador. U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan last week paused Flynn’s case to hear from interested parties in the case and appointed former New York federal judge John Gleeson to argue against the department request. Sullivan also asked Gleeson to examine whether the former three-star general may have committed perjury in the process of pleading guilty to lying about his pre-inauguration contacts with Russia’s ambassador.
Flynn pleads guilty to lying to FBI over contacts with Russian ambassadorFlynn pleads guilty to lying to FBI over contacts with Russian ambassador
In a 44-page filing, Flynn’s lawyers asked the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to order Sullivan to dismiss the case, accused him of bias and acting at “loggerheads” with recent Supreme Court precedent. Sidney Powell and Flynn’s other attorneys also asked that the case be reassigned for any future proceedings. In a 44-page filing to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Flynn’s lawyers accused Sullivan of bias and acting at “loggerheads” with recent Supreme Court precedent. Sidney Powell and Flynn’s other attorneys also asked the case be reassigned for any future proceedings.
“The egregious Government misconduct, and the three-year abuse of General Flynn and his family, cry out for ending this ordeal immediately and permanently,” Powell wrote. “The district judge’s orders reveal his plan to continue the case indefinitely, rubbing salt in General Flynn’s open wound from the Government’s misconduct and threatening him with criminal contempt.”“The egregious Government misconduct, and the three-year abuse of General Flynn and his family, cry out for ending this ordeal immediately and permanently,” Powell wrote. “The district judge’s orders reveal his plan to continue the case indefinitely, rubbing salt in General Flynn’s open wound from the Government’s misconduct and threatening him with criminal contempt.”
The Justice Department on May 7 moved to toss out the guilty plea of the highest-ranking Trump adviser convicted in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation. The department concluded that Flynn should never have been interviewed by the FBI and therefore his lies concealing his Russian contacts were immaterial to any crime.The Justice Department on May 7 moved to toss out the guilty plea of the highest-ranking Trump adviser convicted in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation. The department concluded that Flynn should never have been interviewed by the FBI and therefore his lies concealing his Russian contacts were immaterial to any crime.
Critics dispute the department’s move, saying it distorted facts and appeared to serve the president’s personal political interests by giving an aide impunity to lie to government investigators.Critics dispute the department’s move, saying it distorted facts and appeared to serve the president’s personal political interests by giving an aide impunity to lie to government investigators.
Justice Dept. moves to drop case against FlynnJustice Dept. moves to drop case against Flynn
Flynn pleaded guilty to lying in an FBI interview on Jan. 24, 2017, to conceal conversations with Russia’s ambassador at the time, Sergey Kislyak. The conversations involved talks before Trump took office about avoiding U.S. sanctions and other policies imposed late in Obama’s administration after Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election.Flynn pleaded guilty to lying in an FBI interview on Jan. 24, 2017, to conceal conversations with Russia’s ambassador at the time, Sergey Kislyak. The conversations involved talks before Trump took office about avoiding U.S. sanctions and other policies imposed late in Obama’s administration after Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election.
In a declassified email released Tuesday by Senate Republicans, former national security adviser Susan Rice noted concern in Obama’s White House about the frequency of Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak and that the then-FBI director said sharing classified information with him could “potentially” be an issue. Obama stressed that the handling of the Russia investigation should be done by the book, Rice wrote in a note to herself on Jan. 20, 2017, Trump’s inauguration day.
Prosecutors, not judges, have the authority to decide how to handle pending criminal charges, Flynn’s lawyers told the appeals court. Judges, they said, may not “change the issues in the case by inviting or appointing” others to perform the executive branch’s duties to investigate or prosecute.Prosecutors, not judges, have the authority to decide how to handle pending criminal charges, Flynn’s lawyers told the appeals court. Judges, they said, may not “change the issues in the case by inviting or appointing” others to perform the executive branch’s duties to investigate or prosecute.
“A district court cannot deny the Government’s motion to dismiss because the judge has ‘a disagreement with the prosecution’s exercise of charging authority,’ they said. “Nor should a court second-guess the Government’s ‘conclusion that additional prosecution or punishment would not serve the public interest.’”“A district court cannot deny the Government’s motion to dismiss because the judge has ‘a disagreement with the prosecution’s exercise of charging authority,’ they said. “Nor should a court second-guess the Government’s ‘conclusion that additional prosecution or punishment would not serve the public interest.’”
In asking the case to be reassigned, Flynn’s defense criticized Sullivan for suggesting at a December 2018 hearing that Flynn may have committed “treason,” before correcting himself, and for saying the former general had “sold [his] country out.”In asking the case to be reassigned, Flynn’s defense criticized Sullivan for suggesting at a December 2018 hearing that Flynn may have committed “treason,” before correcting himself, and for saying the former general had “sold [his] country out.”
“This is an umpire who has decided to steal public attention from the players and focus it on himself,” Powell wrote. “He wants to pitch, bat, run bases, and play shortstop. In truth, he is way out in left field.”“This is an umpire who has decided to steal public attention from the players and focus it on himself,” Powell wrote. “He wants to pitch, bat, run bases, and play shortstop. In truth, he is way out in left field.”
The filing also suggests that the retired judge Sullivan appointed is not impartial because of an opinion piece Gleeson published in The Washington Post. In the article, Glesson questioned the Justice Department’s move to dismiss the case against Flynn and suggested the court “assess the credibility of the department’s stated reasons for abruptly reversing course.”The filing also suggests that the retired judge Sullivan appointed is not impartial because of an opinion piece Gleeson published in The Washington Post. In the article, Glesson questioned the Justice Department’s move to dismiss the case against Flynn and suggested the court “assess the credibility of the department’s stated reasons for abruptly reversing course.”
Flynn’s attorneys petitioned the appeals court for a writ of mandamus, used when no other relief is available, that requires a party to show an indisputable right when a court has erred in cases of emergency or public importance.Flynn’s attorneys petitioned the appeals court for a writ of mandamus, used when no other relief is available, that requires a party to show an indisputable right when a court has erred in cases of emergency or public importance.
In abandoning the nearly three-year-old case, the Justice Department cited recently uncovered FBI records showing the bureau had decided to close a counterintelligence investigation of Flynn — dubbed Operation Razor — before learning of his December 2016 calls with Kislyak. The Justice Department also said the FBI knew from transcripts that the calls probably did not give rise to a crime by themselves and that FBI officials differed over how to handle or interpret his actions.In abandoning the nearly three-year-old case, the Justice Department cited recently uncovered FBI records showing the bureau had decided to close a counterintelligence investigation of Flynn — dubbed Operation Razor — before learning of his December 2016 calls with Kislyak. The Justice Department also said the FBI knew from transcripts that the calls probably did not give rise to a crime by themselves and that FBI officials differed over how to handle or interpret his actions.
Legal analysts and those involved in the case vigorously dispute the Justice Department’s claims as an attempt to please the president and attack his adversaries.Legal analysts and those involved in the case vigorously dispute the Justice Department’s claims as an attempt to please the president and attack his adversaries.
Critic’s of Barr’s decision argued the FBI had ample legitimate grounds to investigate Flynn’s lies, which went to the heart of the investigation into whether Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia’s intervention in the election. The investigation also looked into whether Flynn was seeking to reward Russia at Trump’s direction or others’ and whether his lies exposed Flynn to Russian blackmail.Critic’s of Barr’s decision argued the FBI had ample legitimate grounds to investigate Flynn’s lies, which went to the heart of the investigation into whether Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia’s intervention in the election. The investigation also looked into whether Flynn was seeking to reward Russia at Trump’s direction or others’ and whether his lies exposed Flynn to Russian blackmail.
Flynn admitted under oath three times before two federal judges he gave false statements to the FBI as well as the White House. Federal law criminalizes lying in any matter under court, congressional or executive branch jurisdiction.Flynn admitted under oath three times before two federal judges he gave false statements to the FBI as well as the White House. Federal law criminalizes lying in any matter under court, congressional or executive branch jurisdiction.
Justice Dept. moves to drop case against Michael FlynnJustice Dept. moves to drop case against Michael Flynn
Court asks retired judge to oppose Justice Dept. effort to drop Flynn caseCourt asks retired judge to oppose Justice Dept. effort to drop Flynn case
Flynn pleads guilty to lying to FBI about contacts with Russian ambassadorFlynn pleads guilty to lying to FBI about contacts with Russian ambassador
Local newsletters: Local headlines (8 a.m.) | Afternoon Buzz (4 p.m.)Local newsletters: Local headlines (8 a.m.) | Afternoon Buzz (4 p.m.)
Like PostLocal on Facebook | Follow @postlocal on Twitter | Latest local newsLike PostLocal on Facebook | Follow @postlocal on Twitter | Latest local news