This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/us/lori-loughlin-pleads-guilty.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Lori Loughlin to Plead Guilty in College Admissions Scandal Lori Loughlin to Plead Guilty in College Admissions Scandal
(about 1 hour later)
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, a fashion designer, have agreed to plead guilty to charges that they conspired to get their daughters admitted to the University of Southern California as crew recruits, prosecutors announced on Thursday, a reversal for the couple after months of maintaining their innocence in the nation’s largest-ever admissions prosecution.CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, a fashion designer, have agreed to plead guilty to charges that they conspired to get their daughters admitted to the University of Southern California as crew recruits, prosecutors announced on Thursday, a reversal for the couple after months of maintaining their innocence in the nation’s largest-ever admissions prosecution.
Under the terms of the agreement, which still needs approval by a judge, Ms. Loughlin, 55, agreed to serve two months in prison, pay a $150,000 fine and serve two years of supervised release with 100 hours of community service. If the deal is approved, Mr. Giannulli, 56, is expected to serve five months in prison, pay a $250,000 fine and serve two years of supervised release with 250 hours of community service.Under the terms of the agreement, which still needs approval by a judge, Ms. Loughlin, 55, agreed to serve two months in prison, pay a $150,000 fine and serve two years of supervised release with 100 hours of community service. If the deal is approved, Mr. Giannulli, 56, is expected to serve five months in prison, pay a $250,000 fine and serve two years of supervised release with 250 hours of community service.
Ms. Loughlin will plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, the prosecutors said, and Mr. Giannulli will plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud. Prosecutors had accused Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli of paying $500,000 to get their two daughters designated as recruits to U.S.C.’s crew team as a way to ensure their admission to the school.Ms. Loughlin will plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, the prosecutors said, and Mr. Giannulli will plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud. Prosecutors had accused Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli of paying $500,000 to get their two daughters designated as recruits to U.S.C.’s crew team as a way to ensure their admission to the school.
A lawyer for Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli declined to comment.A lawyer for Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli declined to comment.
Ms. Loughlin, who was among more than 50 people charged in a scheme involving bribing coaches and cheating on college entrance exams, pleaded not guilty in the case more than a year ago. In doing so, she took a different path from another Hollywood actress, Felicity Huffman, who was accused of paying a college consultant to inflate her daughter’s SAT score.Ms. Loughlin, who was among more than 50 people charged in a scheme involving bribing coaches and cheating on college entrance exams, pleaded not guilty in the case more than a year ago. In doing so, she took a different path from another Hollywood actress, Felicity Huffman, who was accused of paying a college consultant to inflate her daughter’s SAT score.
Ms Huffman agreed to plead guilty within a month of her arrest and publicly expressed remorse. A judge sentenced her to 14 days in prison, and she ultimately served 11 days in a minimum-security federal prison camp in the San Francisco Bay Area.Ms Huffman agreed to plead guilty within a month of her arrest and publicly expressed remorse. A judge sentenced her to 14 days in prison, and she ultimately served 11 days in a minimum-security federal prison camp in the San Francisco Bay Area.
For months, Hollywood gossip magazines were full of reports that Ms. Loughlin was increasingly worried about the case and that she regretted pleading not guilty and wanted to resolve the charges.For months, Hollywood gossip magazines were full of reports that Ms. Loughlin was increasingly worried about the case and that she regretted pleading not guilty and wanted to resolve the charges.
Late last year, prosecutors turned up the pressure on Ms. Loughlin and other parents to plead guilty, both behind the scenes and in public.Late last year, prosecutors turned up the pressure on Ms. Loughlin and other parents to plead guilty, both behind the scenes and in public.
In an interview in October on WCVB, an ABC affiliate in Boston, the United States attorney for the district of Massachusetts, Andrew Lelling, warned that his office would ask for a longer sentence if Ms. Loughlin went to trial and were convicted than if she pleaded guilty.In an interview in October on WCVB, an ABC affiliate in Boston, the United States attorney for the district of Massachusetts, Andrew Lelling, warned that his office would ask for a longer sentence if Ms. Loughlin went to trial and were convicted than if she pleaded guilty.
“If she’s convicted, I don’t think I’m giving her any state secrets by saying we would probably ask for a higher sentence for her than we did for Felicity Huffman,” Mr. Lelling said, referring to his office’s request of a month of prison time for Ms. Huffman.“If she’s convicted, I don’t think I’m giving her any state secrets by saying we would probably ask for a higher sentence for her than we did for Felicity Huffman,” Mr. Lelling said, referring to his office’s request of a month of prison time for Ms. Huffman.
“I can’t tell you exactly what that would be,” he said. “But the longer the case goes, right — let’s say she goes through to trial — if it’s after trial, I think certainly we’d be asking for something substantially higher. If she resolved her case short of trial, something a little lower than that. But it’s tough to tell at this point how it’s going to develop.”“I can’t tell you exactly what that would be,” he said. “But the longer the case goes, right — let’s say she goes through to trial — if it’s after trial, I think certainly we’d be asking for something substantially higher. If she resolved her case short of trial, something a little lower than that. But it’s tough to tell at this point how it’s going to develop.”
Two weeks later, Mr. Lelling brought new bribery charges against Ms. Loughlin and 10 other parents who had pleaded not guilty in the case.Two weeks later, Mr. Lelling brought new bribery charges against Ms. Loughlin and 10 other parents who had pleaded not guilty in the case.
But in recent months, the prosecution case had seen setbacks after revelations that a college consultant at the heart of the case had taken notes during the investigation suggesting that prosecutors were inappropriately pressuring him to implicate parents.But in recent months, the prosecution case had seen setbacks after revelations that a college consultant at the heart of the case had taken notes during the investigation suggesting that prosecutors were inappropriately pressuring him to implicate parents.
Ms. Loughlin, who is best known for playing Aunt Becky on the 1990s sitcom “Full House,” has also lost acting work. The Hallmark Channel, where she had roles on a show and a television movie series, said immediately after her arrest last spring that it would no longer work with her.Ms. Loughlin, who is best known for playing Aunt Becky on the 1990s sitcom “Full House,” has also lost acting work. The Hallmark Channel, where she had roles on a show and a television movie series, said immediately after her arrest last spring that it would no longer work with her.
Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli were charged in March with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud; prosecutors later added counts of money laundering conspiracy and conspiracy to commit federal programs bribery, as well.Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli were charged in March with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud; prosecutors later added counts of money laundering conspiracy and conspiracy to commit federal programs bribery, as well.
Prosecutors said that Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli had agreed with a college consultant, William Singer, to pay $500,000 to facilitate their daughters’ admission to U.S.C. as recruits to the crew team, despite the fact that they did not participate in crew. Mr. Singer, whom prosecutors have described as the mastermind of the admissions scheme, has pleaded guilty to racketeering and other charges and is cooperating with the government. According to prosecutors, Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli paid $100,000 in donations directly to U.S.C.’s athletic program and another $400,000 to a foundation that Mr. Singer had set up.Prosecutors said that Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli had agreed with a college consultant, William Singer, to pay $500,000 to facilitate their daughters’ admission to U.S.C. as recruits to the crew team, despite the fact that they did not participate in crew. Mr. Singer, whom prosecutors have described as the mastermind of the admissions scheme, has pleaded guilty to racketeering and other charges and is cooperating with the government. According to prosecutors, Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli paid $100,000 in donations directly to U.S.C.’s athletic program and another $400,000 to a foundation that Mr. Singer had set up.
If Ms. Loughlin had gone to trial, her and Mr. Giannulli’s lawyers had suggested that they would try to raise doubts about how much the couple knew about what Mr. Singer intended to do with the money.If Ms. Loughlin had gone to trial, her and Mr. Giannulli’s lawyers had suggested that they would try to raise doubts about how much the couple knew about what Mr. Singer intended to do with the money.
Ms. Loughlin’s daughters, Olivia Jade and Isabella Giannulli, were both enrolled at U.S.C. when the charges were announced, Olivia Jade as a freshman and Isabella as a sophomore. U.S.C. said in October that the two women were no longer enrolled, though it was not clear if they had been dismissed or were allowed to withdraw. U.S.C. had said earlier this year that it was investigating 33 students for admissions violations in connection to the scandal.Ms. Loughlin’s daughters, Olivia Jade and Isabella Giannulli, were both enrolled at U.S.C. when the charges were announced, Olivia Jade as a freshman and Isabella as a sophomore. U.S.C. said in October that the two women were no longer enrolled, though it was not clear if they had been dismissed or were allowed to withdraw. U.S.C. had said earlier this year that it was investigating 33 students for admissions violations in connection to the scandal.
Olivia Jade, a social media influencer who before the scandal broke had close to two million YouTube subscribers and over a million Instagram followers, had attracted criticism before her mother’s arrest for posting a video in which said that she didn’t care about school and was only going to college for “gamedays, partying.” Olivia Jade, a social media influencer who before the scandal broke had close to two million YouTube subscribers and over a million Instagram followers, had attracted criticism before her mother’s arrest for posting a video in which she said that she didn’t care about school and was only going to college for “gamedays, partying.”
After her mother was arrested, she went on a social media hiatus, before returning to Instagram last summer and posting a since-deleted picture of herself making a crude hand gesture amid reports that she was not going back to U.S.C. On December 1, she posted a heavily-edited two-minute video on Instagram in which she said she had missed filming, thanked her followers, and alluded to the scandal, saying that she wished she could address it, but “I’m legally not allowed to speak on anything going on right now.”After her mother was arrested, she went on a social media hiatus, before returning to Instagram last summer and posting a since-deleted picture of herself making a crude hand gesture amid reports that she was not going back to U.S.C. On December 1, she posted a heavily-edited two-minute video on Instagram in which she said she had missed filming, thanked her followers, and alluded to the scandal, saying that she wished she could address it, but “I’m legally not allowed to speak on anything going on right now.”
Kate Taylor reported from Cambridge, and Sarah Mervosh from Canton, Ohio.Kate Taylor reported from Cambridge, and Sarah Mervosh from Canton, Ohio.