This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/22/health/coronarvirus-convalescent-serum.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Uncertain Results in Study of Convalescent Serum for Covid-19 Uncertain Results in Study of Convalescent Serum for Covid-19
(about 11 hours later)
A small study of patients who were severely ill from the coronavirus hints that treatment with antibodies from recovered patients may help recovery and survival, scientists reported on Friday. A small study of patients who were severely ill from the coronavirus hints that treatment with antibodies from recovered patients may modestly help recovery and survival, scientists reported on Friday.
The study, although far from conclusive, is said to be the largest of subjects recovering from Covid-19, the illness caused by the coronavirus. Thirty-nine hospitalized patients were given intravenous infusions of antibodies from patients who had recovered from the condition.The study, although far from conclusive, is said to be the largest of subjects recovering from Covid-19, the illness caused by the coronavirus. Thirty-nine hospitalized patients were given intravenous infusions of antibodies from patients who had recovered from the condition.
The course of illness in patients who received the convalescent plasma was compared to that of similar patients identified through electronic health records who did not get the treatment. This is a weak form of comparison, prone to error. And researchers are wary of studies that take place at a single institution because the results often are not applicable to patients elsewhere. The course of illness in patients who received the convalescent plasma was compared to that of similar patients identified through electronic health records who did not get the treatment.
This is a weak form of comparison, prone to error. And researchers are wary of studies that take place at a single institution, because the results often are not applicable to patients elsewhere.
[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.][Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]
Researchers at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York reported that 18 percent of those who got the plasma of convalescent serum got sicker, compared with 24.3 percent of patients identified through medical records. Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York reported that 18 percent of those who got the plasma of convalescent serum became sicker, compared with 24.3 percent of the patients identified through medical records.
The death rates were 12.8 percent among those who got the antibodies, compared with 24.4 percent among the patients who did not get this treatment. The death rates were 12.8 percent among those who got the antibodies, compared with 24.4 percent among the patients who did not get this treatment. The researchers provided percentages but not actual numbers of patients.
The researchers provided percentages but not actual numbers of patients. And studies like these are fraught with difficulties. Analyses like these are fraught with difficulties. The only way to know for sure if the treatment works is to randomly assign patients to receive antibodies or a placebo.
The only way to know for sure if the treatment works is to randomly assign patients to receive antibodies or a placebo. And it can be impossible to find many patients who agree to have their treatment randomized to an unknown treatment, noted Dr. Arturo Casadevall of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore.
And it can be impossible to find many patients who agree to have their treatment randomized to an unknown treatment, refusing plasma treatment, noted Dr. Arturo Casadevall of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore. The Food and Drug Administration has already authorized the use of convalescent serum in very sick patients. Few hospitalized patients may want to forgo a treatment that appears to be safe and might be effective.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of convalescent serum in very sick patients. Few hospitalized patients may want to forgo a treatment that appears to be safe and might be effective.
“That train has left the station,” Dr. Casadevall said.“That train has left the station,” Dr. Casadevall said.
Another idea, favored by researchers elsewhere, is a randomized trial to see if antibodies from recovered patients can prevent infections in health care workers who are at high risk of being infected. Another way to assess convalescent plasma, favored by researchers elsewhere, is a randomized trial to see if antibodies from recovered patients can prevent infections in health care workers who are at high risk of being infected.
The goal is to have a multicenter trial, to avoid the distortions that can arise when all the data come from one medical center. Researchers not associated with the study will assess efficacy. The idea is to have a multicenter trial, to avoid the distortions that can arise when all the data come from one medical center. Researchers not associated with the study then would assess the efficacy of the treatment.