This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53255033

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Tory peer lambasts 'discriminatory' attendance fee cut Tory peer lambasts 'discriminatory' attendance fee cut
(about 1 hour later)
A disabled member of the House of Lords has said a cut in the daily fees for peers during the Covid-19 crisis has left him thousands of pounds in debt.A disabled member of the House of Lords has said a cut in the daily fees for peers during the Covid-19 crisis has left him thousands of pounds in debt.
Conservative Lord Shinkwin said a reduction in the allowance from £323 a day to £162 had been "irresponsible and discriminatory".Conservative Lord Shinkwin said a reduction in the allowance from £323 a day to £162 had been "irresponsible and discriminatory".
He added the cut, in force since early May, had seen his only source of income "slashed without warning".He added the cut, in force since early May, had seen his only source of income "slashed without warning".
A Lords spokesperson said the allowance "was never intended to be a salary".A Lords spokesperson said the allowance "was never intended to be a salary".
The allowance reduction was meant to reflect arrangements which have allowed peers to take part and vote in debates remotely during the pandemic.The allowance reduction was meant to reflect arrangements which have allowed peers to take part and vote in debates remotely during the pandemic.
The changes were approved by peers after a recommendation from the Lords Commission, which oversees administration of the upper chamber.The changes were approved by peers after a recommendation from the Lords Commission, which oversees administration of the upper chamber.
At the time, Lord Fowler, the Lord Speaker, said the fees reduction reflected the fact most peers were no longer incurring accommodation costs whilst staying in London.At the time, Lord Fowler, the Lord Speaker, said the fees reduction reflected the fact most peers were no longer incurring accommodation costs whilst staying in London.
Most peers are not paid a salary but are able to claim an allowance for the costs associated with attending Parliament.Most peers are not paid a salary but are able to claim an allowance for the costs associated with attending Parliament.
In a scathing letter to Lord Fowler, Lord Shinkwin said the cut had taken "absolutely no account of the cost of living in the real world".In a scathing letter to Lord Fowler, Lord Shinkwin said the cut had taken "absolutely no account of the cost of living in the real world".
'Preserve of rich'
The peer, who was born with a rare genetic brittle bone disease, said the move "discriminates against me as a disabled person", and made the Lords "less diverse and representative".The peer, who was born with a rare genetic brittle bone disease, said the move "discriminates against me as a disabled person", and made the Lords "less diverse and representative".
The reduction in fees, he added, had left him living off the savings he had accumulated as a "safety net" in case he was not able to work as a peer. He added the "ill thought-through" decision to slash the allowance had "strengthened the case" for the abolition of the House of Lords.
"In encouraging the impression the Lords is the exclusive preserve of the rich, you have simply helped ensure its demise becomes more likely, not less," he said.
The reduction in fees, he added, had left him living off the savings he had accumulated as a "safety net" in case he was not able to carry on as a "working peer".
Expenses records show in the twelve months up to January 2020, the latest month for which data is available, Lord Shinkwin claimed a daily allowance for 126 out of 139 days the House of Lords was sitting, which totalled to £39,473. He did not submit claims for any other expenses that he was entitled to.
'I'm alright Jack''I'm alright Jack'
Unlike other peers, he wrote, he did not have the "platinum plated public sector pension" of former MPs, nor a taxpayer-funded housing allowance.Unlike other peers, he wrote, he did not have the "platinum plated public sector pension" of former MPs, nor a taxpayer-funded housing allowance.
"Such an 'I'm alright Jack' approach shows no consideration for those of us who do live in the real world; who gave up secure jobs to enter the Lords in good faith that the allowances would cover our costs," he added."Such an 'I'm alright Jack' approach shows no consideration for those of us who do live in the real world; who gave up secure jobs to enter the Lords in good faith that the allowances would cover our costs," he added.
Lord Shinkwin called on the Lords Commission to restore the attendance allowance to its former levels at a meeting on Thursday.Lord Shinkwin called on the Lords Commission to restore the attendance allowance to its former levels at a meeting on Thursday.
'Difficult decisions''Difficult decisions'
In response, Lords spokesperson said the Lords Commission recognises the "valuable contribution made by all members who participate in the work of the House."In response, Lords spokesperson said the Lords Commission recognises the "valuable contribution made by all members who participate in the work of the House."
They added that "like everyone else, the House of Lords has had to take some difficult decisions because of Covid-19."They added that "like everyone else, the House of Lords has had to take some difficult decisions because of Covid-19."
"The Commission has given considerable thought to how to respond to this unprecedented situation, in the full knowledge there are no easy solutions that can satisfy all members' expectations."The Commission has given considerable thought to how to respond to this unprecedented situation, in the full knowledge there are no easy solutions that can satisfy all members' expectations.
"The daily allowance is not, and was never intended, to be a salary."The daily allowance is not, and was never intended, to be a salary.
"The arrangements are being kept under review as these ways of working evolve.""The arrangements are being kept under review as these ways of working evolve."