This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jul/09/sunak-refuses-to-rule-out-tax-increases-and-urges-britons-to-spend
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| HMRC chief: impossible to judge if UK recovery plan is value for money | HMRC chief: impossible to judge if UK recovery plan is value for money |
| (about 3 hours later) | |
| Permanent secretary wrote to chancellor warning he could not vouch for ‘efficiency’ of plans to boost economy | Permanent secretary wrote to chancellor warning he could not vouch for ‘efficiency’ of plans to boost economy |
| HMRC’s top civil servant, Jim Harra, warned the chancellor it was impossible to judge whether his £1,000-a-worker “job retention bonus”, or his “eat out to help out” meal discount represent good value for taxpayers’ money, it has emerged. | |
| Harra took the relatively rare step of writing to the chancellor this week, in two separate letters, to request a formal “ministerial direction” to go ahead with each scheme – though he said there was “sound policy rationale” for both. | Harra took the relatively rare step of writing to the chancellor this week, in two separate letters, to request a formal “ministerial direction” to go ahead with each scheme – though he said there was “sound policy rationale” for both. |
| The letters, and Sunak’s replies, were published by the government on Thursday. | The letters, and Sunak’s replies, were published by the government on Thursday. |
| Sunak’s job retention bonus will hand employers £1,000 for every furloughed worker who is still on the payroll in January, and could cost £9bn, according to the Treasury. | Sunak’s job retention bonus will hand employers £1,000 for every furloughed worker who is still on the payroll in January, and could cost £9bn, according to the Treasury. |
| Harra warned that as the principal accounting officer of the department funding it, he could not vouch for the scheme’s “efficiency” – because it would be unclear how many additional jobs would be safeguarded. | Harra warned that as the principal accounting officer of the department funding it, he could not vouch for the scheme’s “efficiency” – because it would be unclear how many additional jobs would be safeguarded. |
| “It has proved difficult to establish a counterfactual for this scheme, which depends on the overall cost of the scheme and the number of extra jobs it would protect both of which are currently highly uncertain. That uncertainty also applies to the efficiency of the measure,” he said. | “It has proved difficult to establish a counterfactual for this scheme, which depends on the overall cost of the scheme and the number of extra jobs it would protect both of which are currently highly uncertain. That uncertainty also applies to the efficiency of the measure,” he said. |
| In his reply, Sunak said there were “clearly compelling reasons to justify the introduction of this scheme”, claiming it would “play a vital role in supporting employers to bring their furloughed staff back to work”. | In his reply, Sunak said there were “clearly compelling reasons to justify the introduction of this scheme”, claiming it would “play a vital role in supporting employers to bring their furloughed staff back to work”. |
| Similarly, on the “eat out to help out” discount, Harra warned that the baseline for the scheme – to judge whether or not it has worked – “depends on the future demand for eating out in the absence of this scheme, which is currently highly uncertain”. | Similarly, on the “eat out to help out” discount, Harra warned that the baseline for the scheme – to judge whether or not it has worked – “depends on the future demand for eating out in the absence of this scheme, which is currently highly uncertain”. |
| He stressed it was “entirely appropriate” for the chancellor to make his own judgment, given the severity and fast-moving nature of the downturn. | He stressed it was “entirely appropriate” for the chancellor to make his own judgment, given the severity and fast-moving nature of the downturn. |
| The letters emerged as Labour questioned whether the job retention bonus in particular was well targeted. | The letters emerged as Labour questioned whether the job retention bonus in particular was well targeted. |
| The shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, Bridget Phillipson, seized on Sunak’s admission that there would be some “dead weight loss” in the £9bn scheme – meaning it would be banked by employers who would have brought staff back onto the payroll anyway. | The shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, Bridget Phillipson, seized on Sunak’s admission that there would be some “dead weight loss” in the £9bn scheme – meaning it would be banked by employers who would have brought staff back onto the payroll anyway. |
| In interviews on Thursday, Sunak said this dead weight was necessary to act at the scale and speed required even though it presented “some degree of moral hazard … in an ideal world we wouldn’t be doing those things”. | In interviews on Thursday, Sunak said this dead weight was necessary to act at the scale and speed required even though it presented “some degree of moral hazard … in an ideal world we wouldn’t be doing those things”. |
| But Phillipson said: “The government have had months to prepare for the end of lockdown and design targeted support to protect jobs - but instead we have an on-the-hoof fix that the chancellor himself admits risks wasting billions of pounds of taxpayer money. | But Phillipson said: “The government have had months to prepare for the end of lockdown and design targeted support to protect jobs - but instead we have an on-the-hoof fix that the chancellor himself admits risks wasting billions of pounds of taxpayer money. |
| “Hard-pressed sectors where thousands of jobs are at risk, like aviation, oil and gas, and tourism, will be missing out on the help they need while companies who are returning to normal get public money they don’t.” | “Hard-pressed sectors where thousands of jobs are at risk, like aviation, oil and gas, and tourism, will be missing out on the help they need while companies who are returning to normal get public money they don’t.” |
| She added: “It’s not brave to admit the government plans to waste billions at a time when others are crying out for support.” | She added: “It’s not brave to admit the government plans to waste billions at a time when others are crying out for support.” |
| Experts have questioned whether Sunak’s “plan for jobs” has done enough to tackle the looming unemployment crisis. | Experts have questioned whether Sunak’s “plan for jobs” has done enough to tackle the looming unemployment crisis. |
| The Resolution Foundation thinktank pointed out that recent surveys suggested eight out of nine furloughed workers were set to keep their jobs anyway; while £1000-a-head might be too modest a sum to protect many jobs. Its chief executive, Torsten Bell, called it, “poorly targeted at those jobs that are most at risk of being lost”. | The Resolution Foundation thinktank pointed out that recent surveys suggested eight out of nine furloughed workers were set to keep their jobs anyway; while £1000-a-head might be too modest a sum to protect many jobs. Its chief executive, Torsten Bell, called it, “poorly targeted at those jobs that are most at risk of being lost”. |
| In a series of broadcast appearances on Thursday after delivering his summer statement, the chancellor repeatedly refused to rule out future tax rises to pay for record public spending during the coronavirus pandemic. | In a series of broadcast appearances on Thursday after delivering his summer statement, the chancellor repeatedly refused to rule out future tax rises to pay for record public spending during the coronavirus pandemic. |
| Sunak said it was “too early to speculate” when asked whether the government was planning to increase taxes to pay for the unprecedented public borrowing behind the coronavirus response. | Sunak said it was “too early to speculate” when asked whether the government was planning to increase taxes to pay for the unprecedented public borrowing behind the coronavirus response. |
| He said the extra spending announced in his mini-budget on Wednesday was intended to make the economic recovery as strong as possible but that it depended on whether Britons were willing to go out and spend. | He said the extra spending announced in his mini-budget on Wednesday was intended to make the economic recovery as strong as possible but that it depended on whether Britons were willing to go out and spend. |
| “We’ve moved through the acute phase of the crisis where large swathes of the economy were closed. We’re now fortunately able to safely reopen parts of our economy, that’s the most important thing that we can do to get things going,” he told Sky News. | “We’ve moved through the acute phase of the crisis where large swathes of the economy were closed. We’re now fortunately able to safely reopen parts of our economy, that’s the most important thing that we can do to get things going,” he told Sky News. |
| “But we won’t know the exact shape of that recovery for a little while – how will people respond to the new freedoms of being able to go out and about again. We have to rediscover behaviours that we’ve essentially unlearned over the last few months. | “But we won’t know the exact shape of that recovery for a little while – how will people respond to the new freedoms of being able to go out and about again. We have to rediscover behaviours that we’ve essentially unlearned over the last few months. |
| “Unless activity returns to normal, those jobs are at risk of going, which is why we acted in the way that we did.” | “Unless activity returns to normal, those jobs are at risk of going, which is why we acted in the way that we did.” |
| The chancellor said he was “not going to write future budgets now” when pressed on how the government would pay for the record borrowing behind the measures announced on Wednesday. | The chancellor said he was “not going to write future budgets now” when pressed on how the government would pay for the record borrowing behind the measures announced on Wednesday. |
| Sunak said the cost of not taking this action would be far greater but that such high borrowing was not sustainable and in the medium term ministers would “return our public finances to a sustainable position”. | Sunak said the cost of not taking this action would be far greater but that such high borrowing was not sustainable and in the medium term ministers would “return our public finances to a sustainable position”. |
| He said: “It’s difficult now to get exactly the right trajectory of that because we have an uncertain path ahead but as soon as we have a clearer path about that, we can look at the situation and make sure that our public finances are back on a sustainable footing over a reasonable period of time.” | He said: “It’s difficult now to get exactly the right trajectory of that because we have an uncertain path ahead but as soon as we have a clearer path about that, we can look at the situation and make sure that our public finances are back on a sustainable footing over a reasonable period of time.” |
| A Treasury spokesman said HMRC accepted there was a “clear policy rationale” for the policies, but that Harra’s warnings were needed because of a lack of time, and uncertainty about policy take-up. The same thing had happened, he said, when the jobs furlough scheme was introduced. “The system of ministerial directions is a normal part of business where the managing public money rules, for one reason or another, cannot be met,” the spokesman said. |