This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/13/ghislaine-maxwell-court-sex-trafficking-trial-epstein

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Ghislaine Maxwell pleads not guilty in trafficking case Ghislaine Maxwell pleads not guilty in trafficking case
(32 minutes later)
Maxwell, who faces up to 35 years in federal prison, has been deemed a flight risk by prosecutors fighting her bail requestMaxwell, who faces up to 35 years in federal prison, has been deemed a flight risk by prosecutors fighting her bail request
Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in Manhattan federal court via video feed on Tuesday, for arraignment and bail arguments regarding her alleged involvement in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking of minor girls. Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in Manhattan federal court via video feed on Tuesday, to plead not guilty regarding her alleged involvement in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking of minor girls.
Long out of the public eye, Maxwell wore a brown top and appeared unsettled a far cry from the glamorous, jet-setting image she once cultivated. Seeking to deny Maxwell bail, prosecutors painted her as a flight risk. The court also heard testimony from accusers. One, in an anonymous statement read to the court, described “the sociopathic manner in which [Maxwell] nurtured our [relationships]” and said that “she would have done anything to get what she wanted, to satisfy Mr Epstein”.
She removed her glasses immediately after appearing onscreen. Shortly thereafter, the screen went blank for several minutes. When the proceeding was poised to start in earnest, and she appeared again, Maxwell mostly looked at the screen. At times, she shook her head. Long out of the public eye, Maxwell, 58, wore a brown top and appeared unsettled, a far cry from the glamorous, jet-setting image she once cultivated. She removed her glasses and mostly looked at the screen. At times, she shook her head.
The Briton is requesting bail. Prosecutors oppose her release before trial. Maxwell was arrested on 2 July at her Bradford, New Hampshire, estate. She is charged in a 17-page indictment with conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and perjury.
Maxwell, 58, was arrested on 2 July at her Bradford, New Hampshire, estate. She is charged in a 17-page indictment with conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and perjury.
If convicted, Maxwell faces up to 35 years in federal prison.If convicted, Maxwell faces up to 35 years in federal prison.
In court, the video feed featured four panels, one showing Maxwell, one her defense team, one Judge Alison Nathan and one prosecutors. Audio cut out continually and the judge told Maxwell to inform her if the audio feed didn’t work. “Ms Maxwell,” Judge Alison Nathan asked, “have you had an opportunity to discuss the indictment in this case with your attorney?”
“Thank you, your honor, I will do that,” Maxwell said.
“Ms Maxwell,” the judge asked, “have you had an opportunity to discuss the indictment in this case with your attorney?”
Maxwell said she had, and waived a public reading of the indictment. Asked how she pleaded, she said: “Not guilty, your honor.”Maxwell said she had, and waived a public reading of the indictment. Asked how she pleaded, she said: “Not guilty, your honor.”
Maxwell has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, and her lawyers have said she “vigorously denies the charges” and is “entitled to the presumption of innocence”. The court video feed featured four panels, one showing Maxwell, one her defense team, one the judge and one prosecutors. Audio cut out continually and the judge told Maxwell to inform her if the audio feed didn’t work.
But in court papers, prosecutors opposed Maxwell’s bail request by insisting she poses an “extreme risk of flight” owing to her vast wealth and background. Maxwell is a citizen of France, the UK and the US, possessing passports for all three countries. France, prosecutors noted, “does not extradite its citizens to the United States pursuant to French law”. “Thank you, your honor, I will do that,” Maxwell said.
Prosecutors read a statement from one of Maxwell’s accusers, identified as Jane Doe. Maxwell, the statement said, “enjoyed drawing her victims in with perceived caring”. The same accuser also described Maxwell’s “sociopathic manner”.
Another accuser, Annie Farmer, spoke to the court by phone. Maxwell “tormented her survivors”, she said.
Maxwell has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Her lawyers have said she “vigorously denies the charges” and is “entitled to the presumption of innocence”.
But in court papers, prosecutors insisted she posed an “extreme risk of flight” owing to her vast wealth and background. Maxwell is a citizen of France, the UK and the US, possessing passports for all three countries. France, prosecutors noted, “does not extradite its citizens to the United States pursuant to French law”.
Maxwell, they further claimed, “appears to be skilled at living in hiding”. When FBI agents arrived at her “remote” 156-acre property, she “tried to flee” and agents discovered a “cellphone wrapped in tin foil” which they maintain was “a seemingly misguided effort to evade detection … by law enforcement”.Maxwell, they further claimed, “appears to be skilled at living in hiding”. When FBI agents arrived at her “remote” 156-acre property, she “tried to flee” and agents discovered a “cellphone wrapped in tin foil” which they maintain was “a seemingly misguided effort to evade detection … by law enforcement”.
Prosecutors also said they learned Maxwell “had hired a security company staffed with former members of the British military to guard [her] at the New Hampshire property, in rotations”.Prosecutors also said they learned Maxwell “had hired a security company staffed with former members of the British military to guard [her] at the New Hampshire property, in rotations”.
“There are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant’s presence in court proceedings in this case. Accordingly, any application for bail should be denied,” they wrote. “There are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant’s presence in court proceedings in this case,” they wrote. “Accordingly, any application for bail should be denied.”
In court, pointing to such “serious red flags”, US attorney Alison Moe claimed Maxwell was not being forthright about her finances, having claimed a “monthly income of nothing, zero dollars per month of income”.
“It is simply implausible,” Moe said, “especially given the lifestyle she’s been living. It just doesn’t make sense.”
Maxwell also told pre-trial services she “does not know the name of the corporation” which purchased the New Hampshire property, “but … was just permitted to stay in the house”.
A real estate agent involved in the property’s sale in November 2019, meanwhile, told an FBI agent two people seeking to buy it who introduced themselves as Scott and Janet Marshall “both had British accents”. The man said he was “retired from the British military and currently working on a book”. The woman said she was a journalist.
The woman who introduced herself as Janet Marshall was in fact Ghislaine Maxwell, Moe said.
Maxwell’s lawyers contend that Covid-19 presents a danger to Maxwell and limits her legal defense. They insist that she is not a flight risk, and remained out of public view to avoid the media following Epstein’s arrest last July. Epstein killed himself in federal jail last August.Maxwell’s lawyers contend that Covid-19 presents a danger to Maxwell and limits her legal defense. They insist that she is not a flight risk, and remained out of public view to avoid the media following Epstein’s arrest last July. Epstein killed himself in federal jail last August.
“As this court has noted, the Covid-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented health risk to incarcerated individuals, and Covid-19-related restrictions on attorney communications with pre-trial detainees significantly impair a defendant’s ability to prepare her defense,” Maxwell’s lawyers wrote on Friday in their argument for bail. In court one of Maxwell’s lawyers, Marc Cohen, repeated his argument that she should be released claiming prosecutors overplayed the circumstances surrounding Maxwell’s arrest.
“Simply put, under these circumstances, if Ms Maxwell continues to be detained, her health will be at serious risk and she will not be able to receive a fair trial.” When the FBI came to Maxwell’s home, he said, she was wearing pyjamas. There was one security guard at the house.
“The front door was unlocked,” Cohen said. “The windows were open.”
They are asking the judge to release Maxwell on a $5m personal recognizance bond co-signed by six financially responsible individuals, backed by property in the UK worth more than $3.75m.They are asking the judge to release Maxwell on a $5m personal recognizance bond co-signed by six financially responsible individuals, backed by property in the UK worth more than $3.75m.
Maxwell’s legal team also proposed limiting the onetime jet-setter’s travel to the New York City region, turning in all her passports, requiring home confinement in New York City with GPS location monitoring, and curtailing visitors to immediate family, close friends and attorneys.Maxwell’s legal team also proposed limiting the onetime jet-setter’s travel to the New York City region, turning in all her passports, requiring home confinement in New York City with GPS location monitoring, and curtailing visitors to immediate family, close friends and attorneys.
Prosecutors also revealed in their court filing that they expect “one or more victims will exercise their right to be heard” at Maxwell’s arraignment, “and will urge the court not to grant bail”.Prosecutors also revealed in their court filing that they expect “one or more victims will exercise their right to be heard” at Maxwell’s arraignment, “and will urge the court not to grant bail”.
Maxwell’s trial date was scheduled for 12 July 2021. It is expected to take about two weeks.