This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-tax-returns/2020/07/15/3d37531a-c6b1-11ea-b037-f9711f89ee46_story.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Trump to reapproach legal battle over his tax returns after Supreme Court defeat, lawyers say Trump to reapproach legal battle over his tax returns after Supreme Court defeat, lawyers say
(32 minutes later)
NEW YORK — President Trump intends to continue his legal fight against the Manhattan district attorney over access to his tax records, according to a court filing Wednesday, and may argue the subpoena he faces is overly broad and motivated by politics.NEW YORK — President Trump intends to continue his legal fight against the Manhattan district attorney over access to his tax records, according to a court filing Wednesday, and may argue the subpoena he faces is overly broad and motivated by politics.
Read the filing: Donald J Trump v. Cyrus Vance Jr. and Mazars USA
Trump recently lost his bid to have the grand jury subpoena tossed on the grounds that as sitting president he has absolute immunity from state court proceedings. The Supreme Court decision last week favored efforts by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., whose office was investigating Trump and his business over hush money payments made to two women during the 2016 presidential campaign, including to pornography actress Stormy Daniels.Trump recently lost his bid to have the grand jury subpoena tossed on the grounds that as sitting president he has absolute immunity from state court proceedings. The Supreme Court decision last week favored efforts by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., whose office was investigating Trump and his business over hush money payments made to two women during the 2016 presidential campaign, including to pornography actress Stormy Daniels.
Vance’s office, which is facing a looming statute of limitations should he decide to pursue a felony case, suggested it would not allow the new matters to drag on. It said in Wednesday’s filing that it could enforce the subpoena immediately but would give the president until July 27 to file his new claims before doing so.Vance’s office, which is facing a looming statute of limitations should he decide to pursue a felony case, suggested it would not allow the new matters to drag on. It said in Wednesday’s filing that it could enforce the subpoena immediately but would give the president until July 27 to file his new claims before doing so.
The office “will continue to forbear on execution of the Mazars subpoena pending the orderly resolution” of Trump’s new claims, as long as the litigation “moves on an expedited basis.”The office “will continue to forbear on execution of the Mazars subpoena pending the orderly resolution” of Trump’s new claims, as long as the litigation “moves on an expedited basis.”
Supreme Court says Manhattan prosecutor may pursue Trump’s financial records, denies Congress access for nowSupreme Court says Manhattan prosecutor may pursue Trump’s financial records, denies Congress access for now
The Supreme Court, in its 7-2 decision, left the door open for Trump to pursue other avenues in an attempt to kill the subpoena request to Trump’s accounting firm Mazars USA. Trump’s lawyers indicated Wednesday in a joint memo to U.S. District Court Judge Victor Marrero that “further proceedings are necessary” and that an amended lawsuit seeking to block the subpoena would be filed soon.The Supreme Court, in its 7-2 decision, left the door open for Trump to pursue other avenues in an attempt to kill the subpoena request to Trump’s accounting firm Mazars USA. Trump’s lawyers indicated Wednesday in a joint memo to U.S. District Court Judge Victor Marrero that “further proceedings are necessary” and that an amended lawsuit seeking to block the subpoena would be filed soon.
Marrero, who initially handled the lawsuit by Trump against Vance, ordered the parties to detail whether litigation would continue. As a result of the Suprme Court’s ruling, Trump is barred only from bringing up the presidential immunity issue, which is now considered settled.Marrero, who initially handled the lawsuit by Trump against Vance, ordered the parties to detail whether litigation would continue. As a result of the Suprme Court’s ruling, Trump is barred only from bringing up the presidential immunity issue, which is now considered settled.
He could argue that the request to Mazars is too broad, amounting to a “fishing expedition” or that it was issued in “bad faith” with an ulterior motive.He could argue that the request to Mazars is too broad, amounting to a “fishing expedition” or that it was issued in “bad faith” with an ulterior motive.
Trump is also seeking a delay on the new proceedings on technical grounds, arguing the Supreme Court did not formally send the case back to the Southern District of New York — which Vance’s office disputes.Trump is also seeking a delay on the new proceedings on technical grounds, arguing the Supreme Court did not formally send the case back to the Southern District of New York — which Vance’s office disputes.