This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/21/us/lori-loughlin-mossimo-giannulli-sentencing.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Mossimo Giannulli Gets 5 Months As Lori Loughlin Awaits Sentence in College Admissions Case Lori Loughlin Gets 2 Months in College Admissions Case
(about 2 hours later)
A federal judge on Friday sentenced Mossimo Giannulli, a fashion designer and the husband of the actress Lori Loughlin, to five months in prison for his role in the college admissions scandal, saying that Mr. Giannulli’s privileged life made his crime all the more blameworthy. A federal judge sentenced the actress Lori Loughlin to two months in prison on Friday for her role in the college admissions scandal, ending a closely watched chapter of the sprawling case that underscored the power of wealth in admissions.
“You were not stealing bread to feed your family,” the judge, Nathaniel M. Gorton of the District of Massachusetts, told Mr. Giannulli during the hearing that took place on a videoconference because of concerns about the coronavirus. Ms. Loughlin and her husband, the fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, had pleaded guilty to fraud charges, acknowledging that they paid $500,000 to pass their daughters off as rowers so that they could be admitted to the University of Southern California. The judge sentenced Mr. Giannulli earlier on Friday to five months in prison.
Ms. Loughlin, one of the most widely-known people to be charged in the sprawling admissions prosecution, is set to be sentenced on Friday afternoon. She and her husband have pleaded guilty, acknowledging that they conspired to pass their daughters off as rowers so that they could be admitted to the University of Southern California. If the judge accepts Ms. Loughlin’s guilty plea, she will be sentenced to two months in prison under an agreement with prosecutors. Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli had fought the charges for more than a year. At times, the focus on the boldfaced names involved in the case including the actress Felicity Huffman and Douglas Hodge, the former chief executive of Pimco eclipsed larger questions about inequities in the admissions process and the role of colleges themselves in permitting wealthy parents to game the system.
But, beyond the consequences for the couple and three dozen other well-heeled parents charged in the case, the admissions scandal of 2019 has propelled changes at colleges and universities. Some have drawn new lines between fund-raising and admissions or athletic recruitment. Others have put in place safeguards to ensure that students admitted as athletes are, in fact, athletes. More broadly, the case stirred conversations around the many advantages wealthy students enjoy in the college admissions process, including the help of high-priced tutors and coaches, opportunities to excel in sports that open college doors, and even the option of large donations that can buy access. In response to the admissions scandal that began unfolding in 2019, some colleges and universities drew new lines between fund-raising and admissions or athletic recruitment. Others put in place safeguards to ensure that students admitted as athletes are, in fact, athletes. More broadly, the case stirred conversations around the many advantages wealthy students enjoy in the college admissions process, including help from high-priced tutors and coaches, opportunities to excel in sports that open college doors, preference given to legacy applicants, and even the option of large donations that can buy access.
For all of those changes, however, the nation’s largest college admissions prosecution, which federal law enforcement authorities called Operation Varsity Blues, did not spur as sweeping an overhaul to the admissions system as some had expected. For all of the changes, however, the nation’s largest college admissions prosecution, which federal law enforcement authorities called Operation Varsity Blues, did not spur as sweeping an overhaul to the admissions system as some had expected.
“In some ways, the bad news about the Varsity Blues scandal was that it was so extreme, it enabled people to think it was ‘them’ — and not us,” said Richard Weissbourd, a senior lecturer on education at Harvard, who leads a national effort to reform college admissions as part of the Making Caring Common Project. “In some ways, the bad news about the Varsity Blues scandal was that it was so extreme, it enabled people to think it was ‘them’ — and not us,” said Richard Weissbourd, a senior lecturer on education at Harvard, who leads a national effort to reform college admissions as part of the Making Caring Common Project. Mr. Weissbourd said he had hoped the case would prompt a deeper self-examination by schools, in which “it would all be on the table athletes, donors, legacy, the whole thing.”
More than 50 people were charged in the case, which involved cheating on admissions tests and bribes to college coaches to falsely designate students as athletic recruits. More than 40 people have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty, including William Singer, the college admissions consultant who worked with almost all of the families in the case. More than 50 people were charged in the admissions case, which involved cheating on admissions tests and bribes to college coaches to falsely designate students as athletic recruits. More than 40 people have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty, including William Singer, the college admissions consultant who worked with almost all of the families in the case.
No school was more deeply embroiled in the scandal than U.S.C., where a former top athletics official was among those indicted. This week, the school acknowledged for the first time that the athletic department had passed off wealthy or connected applicants as recruits even more frequently than even the college admissions case had revealed.No school was more deeply embroiled in the scandal than U.S.C., where a former top athletics official was among those indicted. This week, the school acknowledged for the first time that the athletic department had passed off wealthy or connected applicants as recruits even more frequently than even the college admissions case had revealed.
In a statement issued on Thursday, the university said that it had discovered that, dating back to 2012, roughly a dozen students a year had been admitted as recruited athletes but ultimately did not play on a team. Some did not play for legitimate reasons, the school said, but others were clients of Mr. Singer, who were falsely presented as athletic recruits in exchange for donations to the athletic department or bribes. And still others, not tied to Mr. Singer, were also falsely presented as athletes, “due to the past giving and/or potential future generosity of their families, or personal connections with employees in our athletics department,” the university said.In a statement issued on Thursday, the university said that it had discovered that, dating back to 2012, roughly a dozen students a year had been admitted as recruited athletes but ultimately did not play on a team. Some did not play for legitimate reasons, the school said, but others were clients of Mr. Singer, who were falsely presented as athletic recruits in exchange for donations to the athletic department or bribes. And still others, not tied to Mr. Singer, were also falsely presented as athletes, “due to the past giving and/or potential future generosity of their families, or personal connections with employees in our athletics department,” the university said.
The university said that the admissions department was unaware of the fraud, which was perpetrated by “a small number of athletics department employees,” all of whom “have been disciplined and/or are no longer employed by the university.”The university said that the admissions department was unaware of the fraud, which was perpetrated by “a small number of athletics department employees,” all of whom “have been disciplined and/or are no longer employed by the university.”
Since the case was announced in March 2019, U.S.C. has made changes to its admissions process for athletes, including requiring each head coach to certify in writing that a student is being recruited for their athletic ability, and mandating that an Office of Athletic Compliance confirm that each admitted student ultimately joins a team. The university said that a task force led by Charles Zukoski, the new provost, and Mike Bohn, the new director of athletics, was examining whether to make further reforms to the admissions process.Since the case was announced in March 2019, U.S.C. has made changes to its admissions process for athletes, including requiring each head coach to certify in writing that a student is being recruited for their athletic ability, and mandating that an Office of Athletic Compliance confirm that each admitted student ultimately joins a team. The university said that a task force led by Charles Zukoski, the new provost, and Mike Bohn, the new director of athletics, was examining whether to make further reforms to the admissions process.
Other schools, including Harvard, have put in place new, or newly official, policies around fund-raising. Harvard was not involved in the admissions case but has come under scrutiny for issues involving donations. This year the university codified its policies on gifts; under the new rules, it will not solicit gifts from any donor known to have a family member applying for admission to Harvard.Other schools, including Harvard, have put in place new, or newly official, policies around fund-raising. Harvard was not involved in the admissions case but has come under scrutiny for issues involving donations. This year the university codified its policies on gifts; under the new rules, it will not solicit gifts from any donor known to have a family member applying for admission to Harvard.
The University of Virginia now asks students being recruited for athletic teams to sign a pledge that they will actually join the team. It also prohibits its athletic department from soliciting or accepting gifts from families of student-athletes while they are being recruited.The University of Virginia now asks students being recruited for athletic teams to sign a pledge that they will actually join the team. It also prohibits its athletic department from soliciting or accepting gifts from families of student-athletes while they are being recruited.
The scandal may also have contributed to growing criticism of standardized tests in college admissions. But it ultimately took a more disruptive force — the coronavirus pandemic — to cause what appears likely to be a sea change in the use of those tests.The scandal may also have contributed to growing criticism of standardized tests in college admissions. But it ultimately took a more disruptive force — the coronavirus pandemic — to cause what appears likely to be a sea change in the use of those tests.
With many students unable to take the SAT or ACT because of cancellations, hundreds of schools, including all of the Ivy League, have made submitting SAT or ACT scores optional for the coming admissions cycle. The University of California, which had already been under pressure to stop requiring the tests, voted in May to phase them out permanently. While other schools have described the change as temporary, admissions officers said it was unlikely that schools would revert to their old policies, given evidence that the tests advantage wealthy students.With many students unable to take the SAT or ACT because of cancellations, hundreds of schools, including all of the Ivy League, have made submitting SAT or ACT scores optional for the coming admissions cycle. The University of California, which had already been under pressure to stop requiring the tests, voted in May to phase them out permanently. While other schools have described the change as temporary, admissions officers said it was unlikely that schools would revert to their old policies, given evidence that the tests advantage wealthy students.
“There’s not very many examples of colleges and universities moving to test-optional that then move right back,” said Jonathan Burdick, the vice provost for enrollment at Cornell University, adding that he expected to see “a real reset” on the use of standardized tests. Cornell has announced only that it will be test-optional for this year, and has said that it will evaluate its experience before deciding on a permanent policy.“There’s not very many examples of colleges and universities moving to test-optional that then move right back,” said Jonathan Burdick, the vice provost for enrollment at Cornell University, adding that he expected to see “a real reset” on the use of standardized tests. Cornell has announced only that it will be test-optional for this year, and has said that it will evaluate its experience before deciding on a permanent policy.
After maintaining her innocence for months, Ms. Loughlin in May pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud. Her husband, Mr. Giannulli, who prosecutors say was more involved in the scheme, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud.After maintaining her innocence for months, Ms. Loughlin in May pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud. Her husband, Mr. Giannulli, who prosecutors say was more involved in the scheme, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud.
Updated Aug. 21, 2020Updated Aug. 21, 2020
The latest on how schools are reopening amid the pandemic.The latest on how schools are reopening amid the pandemic.
“If I have to send to jail those that who commit crimes yet did not know better,” Judge Gorton told Mr. Giannulli, “surely it is equitable that I send you, who knew full well the criminality of your conduct, to jail.”“If I have to send to jail those that who commit crimes yet did not know better,” Judge Gorton told Mr. Giannulli, “surely it is equitable that I send you, who knew full well the criminality of your conduct, to jail.”
Prosecutors have said that the couple’s daughters were both involved in the fraud, though what exactly they understood is not clear. At Mr. Singer’s instruction, the couple had each daughter pose in a staged photograph on a rowing machine to further the ruse that she was a genuine athlete. The daughters were also copied on emails about fake rowing profiles and registration with the NCAA, prosecutors said.Prosecutors have said that the couple’s daughters were both involved in the fraud, though what exactly they understood is not clear. At Mr. Singer’s instruction, the couple had each daughter pose in a staged photograph on a rowing machine to further the ruse that she was a genuine athlete. The daughters were also copied on emails about fake rowing profiles and registration with the NCAA, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors say that the couple also advised their younger daughter, Olivia Jade Giannulli, on how to keep the scheme from her college counselor at school. When Ms. Giannulli asked her parents whether she should list USC as her top-choice college, Ms. Loughlin said that she should, but added, referring to the counselor, that “it might be a flag for the weasel to meddle.” Subsequently, prosecutors say, Ms. Loughlin told her daughter, “Don’t say too much to that man.”Prosecutors say that the couple also advised their younger daughter, Olivia Jade Giannulli, on how to keep the scheme from her college counselor at school. When Ms. Giannulli asked her parents whether she should list USC as her top-choice college, Ms. Loughlin said that she should, but added, referring to the counselor, that “it might be a flag for the weasel to meddle.” Subsequently, prosecutors say, Ms. Loughlin told her daughter, “Don’t say too much to that man.”
Mr. Giannulli’s attorney, Sean Berkowitz, said that the case had taken an “overwhelming toll” on the family, saying that the couple’s daughters had been bullied both on social media and in person and that the family as a whole “has been the face of the crisis and the scandal in a way disproportionate to their overall role.” One of the couple’s attorneys, Sean Berkowitz, said during Mr. Giannulli’s sentencing that the case had taken an “overwhelming toll” on the family, saying that the couple’s daughters had been bullied both on social media and in person and that the family as a whole “has been the face of the crisis and the scandal in a way disproportionate to their overall role.”
Mr. Giannulli and Ms. Loughlin had not hired Mr. Singer with an intention to commit fraud, Mr. Berkowitz said. Instead, Mr. Berkowitz said, Mr. Singer had been recommended to them by the chairman of the board of trustees of their daughters’ school. Mr. Berkowitz said Mr. Singer had provided legitimate counseling services for nearly a year before proposing the athletic scheme.Mr. Giannulli and Ms. Loughlin had not hired Mr. Singer with an intention to commit fraud, Mr. Berkowitz said. Instead, Mr. Berkowitz said, Mr. Singer had been recommended to them by the chairman of the board of trustees of their daughters’ school. Mr. Berkowitz said Mr. Singer had provided legitimate counseling services for nearly a year before proposing the athletic scheme.
While OK! Magazine reported in recent days that Olivia Jade Giannulli, was throwing a “going away party” for her parents on Thursday night, complete with cake and farewell speeches from friends and family, Mr. Giannulli and Ms. Loughlin will not be going to prison immediately.While OK! Magazine reported in recent days that Olivia Jade Giannulli, was throwing a “going away party” for her parents on Thursday night, complete with cake and farewell speeches from friends and family, Mr. Giannulli and Ms. Loughlin will not be going to prison immediately.
Judge Gorton ordered Mr. Giannulli to report to prison on Nov. 19. Mr. Berkowitz asked the judge to request that Mr. Giannulli be designated to Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc, a low-security prison camp in California. Earlier this year, Lompoc had the largest outbreak of the coronavirus inside any federal prison, with more than 70 percent of inmates testing positive. Two inmates died, according to the Bureau of Prisons. There are currently two known positive cases among staff members, officials said, and none among inmates at the prison.Judge Gorton ordered Mr. Giannulli to report to prison on Nov. 19. Mr. Berkowitz asked the judge to request that Mr. Giannulli be designated to Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc, a low-security prison camp in California. Earlier this year, Lompoc had the largest outbreak of the coronavirus inside any federal prison, with more than 70 percent of inmates testing positive. Two inmates died, according to the Bureau of Prisons. There are currently two known positive cases among staff members, officials said, and none among inmates at the prison.
The coronavirus has spread widely in the nation’s jails and prisons, and so far more than 1,000 prisoners and correctional officers have died. At least two defendants in the admissions case have been released from prison early in recent months because of conditions they were being held in or because they were at risk for more severe complications from the virus. It is unclear if Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli will seek to have their sentences shortened.The coronavirus has spread widely in the nation’s jails and prisons, and so far more than 1,000 prisoners and correctional officers have died. At least two defendants in the admissions case have been released from prison early in recent months because of conditions they were being held in or because they were at risk for more severe complications from the virus. It is unclear if Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli will seek to have their sentences shortened.
Timothy Williams contributed reporting.Timothy Williams contributed reporting.