This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/aug/24/coronavirus-parents-in-england-could-be-fined-if-they-keep-children-off-school-says-minister

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Parents in England could be fined if they keep children off school Schools in England will have to provide remote learning if closed again
(about 2 hours later)
Schools minister Nick Gibb says fines would be ‘last resort’ as PM says risk of children getting Covid-19 is small No 10 says it will look at closures on case-by-case basis, as parents warned of fines for absences
Parents in England could be fined if they decide to keep their children off school from September, the schools minister, Nick Gibb, has said. Schools in England could be forced to close again if stricter local lockdown measures are needed to prevent the spread of coronavirus, but teachers must prepare remote learning for pupils, Downing Street has said.
Financial penalties would be a “last resort” but were still available to local authorities if youngsters were kept away from the classroom, he said. Boris Johnson spoke of a “moral duty” to get children back into education after five months of absence and said the risk of picking up the virus in schools was small.
Boris Johnson spoke of a “moral duty” to get children back into education after five months of absence due to the coronavirus pandemic and said the risk of picking up the virus in schools was small. On Monday parents were warned they could be fined if they decide to keep children off. In any future lockdown that requires schools to close, teachers would be mandated to keep learning ongoing at home.
Asked if there would be mass closures of schools again, even on a localised basis, a Downing Street spokesman said: “We would need to look on a case-by-case basis at the local area … it would depend on the local lockdown in question and the circumstances around increasing cases. If that was the case and that needed to happen, we would expect the school to provide a remote education.”
Outbreaks around schools would be dealt with by deploying mobile testing units, testing staff and potentially isolating some pupils or groups, Downing Street said.
The schools minister, Nick Gibb, said financial penalties would be a “last resort” but were still available to local authorities if pupils were kept away from the classroom.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Gibb said: “Fines for non-attendance have always been a last resort for headteachers in schools. What matters is that young people are attending school.Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Gibb said: “Fines for non-attendance have always been a last resort for headteachers in schools. What matters is that young people are attending school.
“We live in a country where education is compulsory and I think parents can be reassured that the measures that schools are taking to make sure that we minimise the risk of the transmission of the virus are very effective.”“We live in a country where education is compulsory and I think parents can be reassured that the measures that schools are taking to make sure that we minimise the risk of the transmission of the virus are very effective.”
He said he had visited schools preparing for the return next week that had devised safety measures such as “bubble zones” to keep the same group of children together. He said he had visited schools preparing for the return next week that had devised safety measures such as “bubble zones” to keep groups of children together.
Other measures might include installing more hand-basins and hand-sanitiser, different entrances being opened around the school, and pupils having their own designated keyboards. Other measures might include installing more hand basins and hand sanitiser points, different entrances being opened around the school, and pupils having their own designated keyboards.
Headteachers should be able to reassure families that the measures they had taken meant it was safe for children to come back, Gibb suggested, without the need for the local authority to issue penalty notices. No 10 said it was not changing its guidance on mask usage in schools. “Our guidance does not recommend face masks in school, we acknowledge face coverings could obstruct communication between teachers and pupils,” Johnson’s spokesman said.
“If they have got extra concerns that’s a matter between the headteacher and the family,” he said. Scotland’s education secretary, John Swinney, is consulting with teachers and councils on the possibility of bringing in guidance on masks in secondary schools there.
The fines for unauthorised absences are £60 rising to £120 if there is a delay in paying it. They are often applied to people to who take their children out of school in term time for holidays. Gibb suggested headteachers in England should be able to reassure families that the measures they had taken meant it was safe for children to come back without the need for local authorities to issue penalty notices.
There would be no change to this system in light of the coronavirus pandemic, Gibb suggested. “If they have got extra concerns, that’s a matter between the headteacher and the family,” he said.
In a second interview with BBC Breakfast, he said: “Fines are available. We haven’t suspended the law on that issue from September onwards, but, knowing headteachers as I do, they use that measure absolutely as a very last resort and in the current climate they will want to be talking to parents to allay their concerns.” Fines for unauthorised absences are £60, rising to £120 if there is a delay in paying. They are often applied to people who take their children out of school in term time for holidays. Gibb suggested there would be no change to this system in light of the pandemic.
In a second interview with BBC Breakfast, he said: “Fines are available. We haven’t suspended the law on that issue from September onwards, but, knowing headteachers as I do, they use that measure absolutely as a very last resort, and in the current climate they will want to be talking to parents to allay their concerns.”
The deputy chief medical officer for England, Dr Jenny Harries, said in an interview with Sky News on Monday that children were more at risk from seasonal flu than coronavirus.The deputy chief medical officer for England, Dr Jenny Harries, said in an interview with Sky News on Monday that children were more at risk from seasonal flu than coronavirus.
Death from the illness would be exceptionally rare and when children do get an infection it was very mild and sometimes asymptomatic, she said. Child deaths from coronavirus were exceptionally rare, and when children did get an infection it was very mild and sometimes asymptomatic, she said.
The shadow education secretary, Kate Green, accused the government of going “missing in action” and being “asleep at the wheel”. She told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “The guidance that’s been given to schools is one-size-fits-all. It doesn’t take account of the fact that a small school, perhaps in very constrained premises, will have to make different arrangements from a large inner-city school.The shadow education secretary, Kate Green, accused the government of going “missing in action” and being “asleep at the wheel”. She told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “The guidance that’s been given to schools is one-size-fits-all. It doesn’t take account of the fact that a small school, perhaps in very constrained premises, will have to make different arrangements from a large inner-city school.
“There hasn’t been information for school leaders, so that they can’t plan what they might have to do if there was a sudden spike in the local infection rate and the guidance that has come out I think has been – it’s been contradictory, it’s been confusing, it came very late, shortly before the summer holidays.”“There hasn’t been information for school leaders, so that they can’t plan what they might have to do if there was a sudden spike in the local infection rate and the guidance that has come out I think has been – it’s been contradictory, it’s been confusing, it came very late, shortly before the summer holidays.”
Many pupils in England have not attended classes since March, when schools were closed except to look after vulnerable children and those of keyworkers. Many pupils in England have not attended classes since March, when schools were closed except to look after vulnerable children and those of key workers.
Schools in Scotland reopened earlier this month, while those in Northern Ireland were welcoming pupils again on Monday. English and Welsh schools will follow suit in September. Schools in Scotland reopened this month, while those in Northern Ireland were welcoming pupils again on Monday. English and Welsh schools will follow suit in September.