This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7907968.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Auditor asked to review tram row Auditor asked to review tram row
(about 2 hours later)
The auditor general has been asked to look into the row that has delayed work on Edinburgh's new tram network. The auditor general has been urged to look into the row that has delayed work on Edinburgh's new tram network.
Conservative MSP David McLetchie has asked Robert Black to investigate whether contractors were permitted to "simply down tools". SNP MSP Shirley-Anne Somerville and Tory MSP David McLetchie want Robert Black to investigate the tram dispute.
The city's main thoroughfare, Princes Street, has been closed to traffic since Saturday despite the suspension of work to lay new tracks.The city's main thoroughfare, Princes Street, has been closed to traffic since Saturday despite the suspension of work to lay new tracks.
The contractors have asked for extra money to cover "additional costs". The SNP MSP wants Audit Scotland to assess whether the tram project should be allowed to continue.
It cannot be right that contractors can simply down tools David McLetchieConservative MSP Mr McLetchie, who represents Edinburgh Pentlands, said the impasse had wider implications for other public works projects in Scotland. The organisation overseeing the project, Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (Tie), said the contractors' demands could add £50m -£80m to the cost of the project.
Talks continued in Edinburgh on Tuesday to try to resolve the dispute.
Ms Somerville said: "I am today writing to Audit Scotland asking them to re-examine the tram project. No-one in Edinburgh believes it is either on time or on budget and all those opposition parties that voted for this project must be sorely regretting their decision.
"If this project will not be completed for £500m let's find out how much it will cost and put a stop to these escalating bills one way or the other.
"If the final cost is escalating there will be many people looking for an early end to the pain and disruption caused across the city."
Mr McLetchie, who represents Edinburgh Pentlands, said the impasse had wider implications for other public works projects in Scotland.
"What is of particular concern here is not only the prospect of an increase in the project cost, but that the contractors have apparently refused to proceed with the contract while these issues are resolved," he wrote to the auditor general."What is of particular concern here is not only the prospect of an increase in the project cost, but that the contractors have apparently refused to proceed with the contract while these issues are resolved," he wrote to the auditor general.
"This does not seem to be a sensible way to conduct business ... It cannot be right that contractors can simply down tools while such claims are resolved.""This does not seem to be a sensible way to conduct business ... It cannot be right that contractors can simply down tools while such claims are resolved."
The organisation overseeing the project, Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (Tie), has said the contractors' demands could add £50m -£80m to the cost of the project.
Princes Street was due to be closed until November for the work, but retailers have expressed concern that the timetable could slip if the delays continue.
Talks continued in Edinburgh on Tuesday to try to resolve the dispute.