This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/515913-china-africa-daily-government-official/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Twitter labels Chinese newspaper as ‘UK government official’ in apparent bizarre algorithmic blunder | Twitter labels Chinese newspaper as ‘UK government official’ in apparent bizarre algorithmic blunder |
| (7 months later) | |
| As tech giants struggle to rein in or categorize all behavior on their platforms, accidents are bound to happen. Which may have been the case when Twitter labelled a Chinese newspaper as a “United Kingdom Government Official.” | As tech giants struggle to rein in or categorize all behavior on their platforms, accidents are bound to happen. Which may have been the case when Twitter labelled a Chinese newspaper as a “United Kingdom Government Official.” |
| The China Daily is an English-language daily newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Chinese Communist Party, with a global distribution managed by offices in cities like New York City, Washington, D.C., London, and Kathmandu. In December 2012, it also established an African edition, published out of Nairobi, Kenya. | The China Daily is an English-language daily newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Chinese Communist Party, with a global distribution managed by offices in cities like New York City, Washington, D.C., London, and Kathmandu. In December 2012, it also established an African edition, published out of Nairobi, Kenya. |
| After almost a decade in operation, then, it came as quite a shock on Thursday when Twitter decided to label the African arm of the Chinese publication as a “United Kingdom Government Official.” | After almost a decade in operation, then, it came as quite a shock on Thursday when Twitter decided to label the African arm of the Chinese publication as a “United Kingdom Government Official.” |
| None was more shocked than China Daily EU bureau chief Chen Weihua, who took the opportunity to skewer the tech giant for what he dubbed “bias against Chinese accounts.” | None was more shocked than China Daily EU bureau chief Chen Weihua, who took the opportunity to skewer the tech giant for what he dubbed “bias against Chinese accounts.” |
| Other, equally baffled commenters shared their derision and dismay at the algorithmic aberration, with some describing it as a joke and a shame, while others said the gaffe was “Almost an insult.” | Other, equally baffled commenters shared their derision and dismay at the algorithmic aberration, with some describing it as a joke and a shame, while others said the gaffe was “Almost an insult.” |
| Some couldn’t miss the opportunity to throw some shade the UK’s way, amid escalating tensions between London and Beijing and a back-and-forth censoring and deplatforming of each other’s national broadcasters. | Some couldn’t miss the opportunity to throw some shade the UK’s way, amid escalating tensions between London and Beijing and a back-and-forth censoring and deplatforming of each other’s national broadcasters. |
| “They’ve finally figured out how to label an account untrustworthy,” quipped one Twitter user. “Can this be used as evidence to demand a salary payment from the British government?” snickered another. | “They’ve finally figured out how to label an account untrustworthy,” quipped one Twitter user. “Can this be used as evidence to demand a salary payment from the British government?” snickered another. |
| “Oops, that’s what happens when a tech company politicizes everything and poses as the arbiter of truth,” wrote one user, clearly fed up with Silicon Valley censorship. | “Oops, that’s what happens when a tech company politicizes everything and poses as the arbiter of truth,” wrote one user, clearly fed up with Silicon Valley censorship. |
| Twitter instituted a policy targeting state-owned or affiliated accounts in the summer of 2020, ostensibly aimed at making “the experience more transparent,” but they may have inadvertently exposed severe flaws in their own algorithm in the process. | Twitter instituted a policy targeting state-owned or affiliated accounts in the summer of 2020, ostensibly aimed at making “the experience more transparent,” but they may have inadvertently exposed severe flaws in their own algorithm in the process. |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |