This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/uk/518587-university-lecturer-question-marks/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Judge rules university lecturer was ‘unnecessarily aggressive’ by using too much punctuation in texts | Judge rules university lecturer was ‘unnecessarily aggressive’ by using too much punctuation in texts |
| (6 months later) | |
| An employment tribunal judge has ruled that a physics lecturer at the UK’s University of Loughborough, acted in an “unnecessarily aggressive” and “intimidating” way by putting lots of question marks at the end of messages. | An employment tribunal judge has ruled that a physics lecturer at the UK’s University of Loughborough, acted in an “unnecessarily aggressive” and “intimidating” way by putting lots of question marks at the end of messages. |
| Dr. Binoy Sobnack – who still works as a lecturer – was dismissed from his additional role as the warden of a residence hall last year after several student complaints were made about his text messages, the Daily Mail reported. | Dr. Binoy Sobnack – who still works as a lecturer – was dismissed from his additional role as the warden of a residence hall last year after several student complaints were made about his text messages, the Daily Mail reported. |
| Sobnack responded by suing the university, and an employment tribunal has now ruled that the lecturer was unfairly dismissed, awarding him £14,429.22. | Sobnack responded by suing the university, and an employment tribunal has now ruled that the lecturer was unfairly dismissed, awarding him £14,429.22. |
| Judge Richard Adkinson, however, also ruled that Sobnack’s messages could indeed be considered “brusque, blunt and unnecessarily aggressive in tone,” and that so many question marks “cannot sensibly be read as a genuine question.” The judge also pointed out that Sobnack had ignored others who advised him to stop the practice and “watch his tone” in communications with students. | Judge Richard Adkinson, however, also ruled that Sobnack’s messages could indeed be considered “brusque, blunt and unnecessarily aggressive in tone,” and that so many question marks “cannot sensibly be read as a genuine question.” The judge also pointed out that Sobnack had ignored others who advised him to stop the practice and “watch his tone” in communications with students. |
| “The use of multiple exclamation or question marks could well change or influence how a recipient might perceive a text message, and might make an otherwise neutral text appear aggressive, intimidating or suggesting disbelief,” Adkinson ruled, claiming that the question marks “must have been deliberate” and not accidental. | “The use of multiple exclamation or question marks could well change or influence how a recipient might perceive a text message, and might make an otherwise neutral text appear aggressive, intimidating or suggesting disbelief,” Adkinson ruled, claiming that the question marks “must have been deliberate” and not accidental. |
| “He must have wanted to convey a particular sub-text because they have no other linguistic function,” Adkinson added. | “He must have wanted to convey a particular sub-text because they have no other linguistic function,” Adkinson added. |
| Examples of Sobnack’s offending messages included, “Why don’t you listen?????? Stick to what has been decided!” and “Do you have to stay for dinner????” | Examples of Sobnack’s offending messages included, “Why don’t you listen?????? Stick to what has been decided!” and “Do you have to stay for dinner????” |
| Like this story? Share it with a friend! | Like this story? Share it with a friend! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |