This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/russia/518810-uk-weapon-stockpile-npt-violation/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| By increasing its nuclear weapon stockpile, ‘hypocritical’ UK is violating 50-year-old non-proliferation treaty — Russian senator | By increasing its nuclear weapon stockpile, ‘hypocritical’ UK is violating 50-year-old non-proliferation treaty — Russian senator |
| (6 months later) | |
| Britain's move to grow its stockpile of warheads by 40% is a violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. That's according to Konstantin Kosachev, the vice chairman of Russia's senate. | Britain's move to grow its stockpile of warheads by 40% is a violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. That's according to Konstantin Kosachev, the vice chairman of Russia's senate. |
| Last week, London announced that it would be ending its policy of gradually reducing its number of nuclear missiles. Later, on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, UK Defense Minister Ben Wallace revealed that 10 Downing Street took the decision in response to Russia investing “strongly in ballistic missile defense,” noting that Britain needs to have a credible deterrent. | Last week, London announced that it would be ending its policy of gradually reducing its number of nuclear missiles. Later, on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, UK Defense Minister Ben Wallace revealed that 10 Downing Street took the decision in response to Russia investing “strongly in ballistic missile defense,” noting that Britain needs to have a credible deterrent. |
| “This decision by itself is a clear violation of the non-proliferation treaty and many other agreements that prescribe only the reduction of the number of nuclear warheads,” Kosachev wrote on his Facebook page. “The [British] strategy calls for a 40% increase in the country's nuclear capabilities.” | “This decision by itself is a clear violation of the non-proliferation treaty and many other agreements that prescribe only the reduction of the number of nuclear warheads,” Kosachev wrote on his Facebook page. “The [British] strategy calls for a 40% increase in the country's nuclear capabilities.” |
| The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was agreed in 1968 and came into force in 1970. Among other things, the signatories pledged that they would undertake good-faith efforts to achieve complete disarmament. | The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was agreed in 1968 and came into force in 1970. Among other things, the signatories pledged that they would undertake good-faith efforts to achieve complete disarmament. |
| After last week’s comprehensive spending review, London announced it would be increasing its number of missiles from 195 to 260. Although a significant expansion of the arsenal, the British stockpile will still be smaller than those of Russia, America and France. | After last week’s comprehensive spending review, London announced it would be increasing its number of missiles from 195 to 260. Although a significant expansion of the arsenal, the British stockpile will still be smaller than those of Russia, America and France. |
| “All along, Westerners have been hypocritically arguing that, first, their missile defense systems had nothing to do with strategic nuclear weapons, and second, that these systems were in no way directed against Russia,” Kosachev added. “So when did Britain lie, Mr. Secretary, then or now?” | “All along, Westerners have been hypocritically arguing that, first, their missile defense systems had nothing to do with strategic nuclear weapons, and second, that these systems were in no way directed against Russia,” Kosachev added. “So when did Britain lie, Mr. Secretary, then or now?” |
| The politician was referring to the NATO missile defense system in Europe, which the US-led bloc has repeatedly claimed is not aimed explicitly at Moscow. | The politician was referring to the NATO missile defense system in Europe, which the US-led bloc has repeatedly claimed is not aimed explicitly at Moscow. |
| Following the announcement, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the press that London’s decision “harms international stability and strategic security.” | Following the announcement, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the press that London’s decision “harms international stability and strategic security.” |
| “Yet again, an ephemeral threat from Russia was voiced as justification,” he noted. “Russia is not a threat, but the buildup of warheads is something that endangers peace all over the world.” | “Yet again, an ephemeral threat from Russia was voiced as justification,” he noted. “Russia is not a threat, but the buildup of warheads is something that endangers peace all over the world.” |
| While the US and Russia are part of the New START arrangement, a bilateral treaty with restrictions on nuclear weapons, the UK is not bound by these rules. According to Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, extra weapons in the hands of Washington’s allies affects the Russian-US strategic balance. | While the US and Russia are part of the New START arrangement, a bilateral treaty with restrictions on nuclear weapons, the UK is not bound by these rules. According to Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, extra weapons in the hands of Washington’s allies affects the Russian-US strategic balance. |
| “The decision of the UK leadership emphasizes a long-felt need for involving American nuclear allies in efforts to reduce nuclear weapons,” Zakharova said. | “The decision of the UK leadership emphasizes a long-felt need for involving American nuclear allies in efforts to reduce nuclear weapons,” Zakharova said. |
| Like this story? Share it with a friend! | Like this story? Share it with a friend! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |