This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/522175-supreme-court-concealed-handgun-newyork/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| US Supreme Court agrees to hear landmark 2nd Amendment case on carrying handguns in public | US Supreme Court agrees to hear landmark 2nd Amendment case on carrying handguns in public |
| (4 months later) | |
| The highest court in America has agreed to hear an appeal, backed by the National Rifle Association (NRA), against New York State's restrictions on carrying concealed handguns in public for self-defense purposes. | The highest court in America has agreed to hear an appeal, backed by the National Rifle Association (NRA), against New York State's restrictions on carrying concealed handguns in public for self-defense purposes. |
| Two gun owners and the New York affiliate of the NRA are looking to overturn a decision by a lower court, which rejected their challenge to the state's gun regulations. New York is one of just eight US states which currently limit a gun owner's right to carry their weapon in public. | Two gun owners and the New York affiliate of the NRA are looking to overturn a decision by a lower court, which rejected their challenge to the state's gun regulations. New York is one of just eight US states which currently limit a gun owner's right to carry their weapon in public. |
| The plaintiffs argued that those restrictions have violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, insisting instead that New Yorkers should also be able to carry guns outside their homes unhampered. | The plaintiffs argued that those restrictions have violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, insisting instead that New Yorkers should also be able to carry guns outside their homes unhampered. |
| The two men initially went to court after a state firearms licensing officer granted them "concealed carry" permits, but limited it to hunting and target practice only. | The two men initially went to court after a state firearms licensing officer granted them "concealed carry" permits, but limited it to hunting and target practice only. |
| The Supreme Court, which had refused to examine the appeal last June, has now changed its mind, again embedding itself into the heated gun rights debate in America. | The Supreme Court, which had refused to examine the appeal last June, has now changed its mind, again embedding itself into the heated gun rights debate in America. |
| The case, which will likely be heard in autumn, could prove one of the most prominent rulings on the scope of the Second Amendment since the 2008 and 2010 decisions that established a nationwide right to keep a gun at home for self-defense. | The case, which will likely be heard in autumn, could prove one of the most prominent rulings on the scope of the Second Amendment since the 2008 and 2010 decisions that established a nationwide right to keep a gun at home for self-defense. |
| The plaintiffs' hopes of success may be boosted by the fact that there's a 6-3 conservative majority in the Supreme Court, after Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the body in October. Conservatives are generally believed to have a more expansive view of Second Amendment rights. | The plaintiffs' hopes of success may be boosted by the fact that there's a 6-3 conservative majority in the Supreme Court, after Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the body in October. Conservatives are generally believed to have a more expansive view of Second Amendment rights. |
| The Supreme Court should settle this issue once and for all, lawyer Paul Clement, who is representing the challengers, wrote in his reply brief to the court. "Thus, the nation is split, with the Second Amendment alive and well in the vast middle of the nation, and those same rights disregarded near the coasts," he argued. | The Supreme Court should settle this issue once and for all, lawyer Paul Clement, who is representing the challengers, wrote in his reply brief to the court. "Thus, the nation is split, with the Second Amendment alive and well in the vast middle of the nation, and those same rights disregarded near the coasts," he argued. |
| For its part, New York State has urged the justices to reject that argument, pointing out that the restrictions on carrying guns aren't a blanket ban and are aimed at reducing crime as well as promoting public safety. | For its part, New York State has urged the justices to reject that argument, pointing out that the restrictions on carrying guns aren't a blanket ban and are aimed at reducing crime as well as promoting public safety. |
| The announcement that the controversial appeal will be heard by the Supreme Court comes in the wake of a string of deadly mass shootings across the country. Earlier this month, a gunman killed eight employees and then committed suicide at a FedEx facility in Indianapolis, while two similar incidents in Georgia and Colorado killed a combined total of 18 people in March. | The announcement that the controversial appeal will be heard by the Supreme Court comes in the wake of a string of deadly mass shootings across the country. Earlier this month, a gunman killed eight employees and then committed suicide at a FedEx facility in Indianapolis, while two similar incidents in Georgia and Colorado killed a combined total of 18 people in March. |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |