This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/523194-who-urges-pharmaceutical-industry-transparency/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
WHO asks Big Pharma for more transparent vaccine data with fewer redactions to boost ‘public trust’ & scientific ‘integrity’ WHO asks Big Pharma for more transparent vaccine data with fewer redactions to boost ‘public trust’ & scientific ‘integrity’
(about 1 month later)
The pharmaceutical industry must provide widespread access to clinical data for new medicines and vaccines, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) have said.The pharmaceutical industry must provide widespread access to clinical data for new medicines and vaccines, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) have said.
“The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed how essential to public trust access to data is,” the organizations said in a joint statement on Friday.“The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed how essential to public trust access to data is,” the organizations said in a joint statement on Friday.
“ICMRA and WHO call on the pharmaceutical industry to commit, within short timelines, and without waiting for legal changes, to provide voluntary unrestricted access to trial results data.”“ICMRA and WHO call on the pharmaceutical industry to commit, within short timelines, and without waiting for legal changes, to provide voluntary unrestricted access to trial results data.”
The organizations said that both positive and negative clinical trial data should be published, without the redaction of confidential information due to the “overriding public health interest” in the fuller information.The organizations said that both positive and negative clinical trial data should be published, without the redaction of confidential information due to the “overriding public health interest” in the fuller information.
The ICMRA and WHO also say greater transparency will help avoid “wrong regulatory decisions,” which may affect patients receiving medicines.The ICMRA and WHO also say greater transparency will help avoid “wrong regulatory decisions,” which may affect patients receiving medicines.
“Lack of public access to negative trials has been identified as a source of bias, which weakens the conclusions of systematic reviews and provides a false sense of reassurance on the safety or efficacy of the medicine,” the statement adds.“Lack of public access to negative trials has been identified as a source of bias, which weakens the conclusions of systematic reviews and provides a false sense of reassurance on the safety or efficacy of the medicine,” the statement adds.
The comments came just one day after the WHO backed the decision by US President Joe Biden's administration this week to temporarily waive patent protections for coronavirus vaccines.The comments came just one day after the WHO backed the decision by US President Joe Biden's administration this week to temporarily waive patent protections for coronavirus vaccines.
The move, which has angered some drug companies, was described by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus as a “monumental moment in the fight against Covid-19.”The move, which has angered some drug companies, was described by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus as a “monumental moment in the fight against Covid-19.”
Supporters of the plans claim that greater transparency by pharmaceutical companies will boost vaccine production, which will help increase the flow of jabs to countries like India that are currently experiencing Covid-19 surges.Supporters of the plans claim that greater transparency by pharmaceutical companies will boost vaccine production, which will help increase the flow of jabs to countries like India that are currently experiencing Covid-19 surges.
Critics of the proposals, meanwhile, have countered that a waiver on intellectual property for vaccines may take years and will not necessarily make jabs more available to areas that most require them or poorer nations.Critics of the proposals, meanwhile, have countered that a waiver on intellectual property for vaccines may take years and will not necessarily make jabs more available to areas that most require them or poorer nations.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!Like this story? Share it with a friend!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.