This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/524060-supreme-court-abortion-roe-wade/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Supreme Court takes on major Mississippi abortion case that could roll back Roe v. Wade Supreme Court takes on major Mississippi abortion case that could roll back Roe v. Wade
(about 2 months later)
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a major abortion case from Mississippi that could allow states to ban abortions prior to fetal viability. If successful, the state could pave the way for a rollback of abortion rights.The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a major abortion case from Mississippi that could allow states to ban abortions prior to fetal viability. If successful, the state could pave the way for a rollback of abortion rights.
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization this fall. The case, brought by Mississippi officials, asks the court to consider whether the state’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks is constitutional. At present, states may not ban abortions that take place before 22 weeks, considered the earliest date a fetus can survive outside the womb.The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization this fall. The case, brought by Mississippi officials, asks the court to consider whether the state’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks is constitutional. At present, states may not ban abortions that take place before 22 weeks, considered the earliest date a fetus can survive outside the womb.
Lower courts have already decided that the Mississippi law, passed in 2018, clashes with the constitutional right to an abortion set forth in Roe v. Wade in 1973. However, Mississippi is asking the Supreme Court to weigh this right against subsequent rulings that permit states to restrict abortion so long as an “undue burden” isn’t placed on a woman seeking such a procedure. Lower courts have already decided that the Mississippi law, passed in 2018, clashes with the constitutional right to an abortion set forth in Roe v. Wade in 1973. However, Mississippi is asking the Supreme Court to weigh this right against subsequent rulings that permit states to restrict abortion so long as an “undue burden” isn’t placed on a woman seeking such a procedure. 
The filing from Mississippi’s Department of Health also asks the court to weigh these rulings against other precedents that assert a state’s interest in protecting a mother and the unborn child’s lives “from the outset of the pregnancy,” given that modern technology has made fetuses viable from an earlier age.The filing from Mississippi’s Department of Health also asks the court to weigh these rulings against other precedents that assert a state’s interest in protecting a mother and the unborn child’s lives “from the outset of the pregnancy,” given that modern technology has made fetuses viable from an earlier age.
The case will be heard by a court minus its most ardent supporter of abortion rights, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died last September. Her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, is an opponent of abortion, but has never ruled directly on the issue. Since Barrett’s appointment by former President Donald Trump, conservative or conservative-leaning justices make up a 6-3 majority on the bench. Trump appointed three of these conservatives: Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch.The case will be heard by a court minus its most ardent supporter of abortion rights, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died last September. Her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, is an opponent of abortion, but has never ruled directly on the issue. Since Barrett’s appointment by former President Donald Trump, conservative or conservative-leaning justices make up a 6-3 majority on the bench. Trump appointed three of these conservatives: Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh voted in dissent last year to allow Louisiana to impose limits on doctors carrying out abortions, but fellow conservative Justice John Roberts sided with his liberal colleagues to ensure that the restrictions were struck down.Gorsuch and Kavanaugh voted in dissent last year to allow Louisiana to impose limits on doctors carrying out abortions, but fellow conservative Justice John Roberts sided with his liberal colleagues to ensure that the restrictions were struck down.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!Like this story? Share it with a friend!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.