This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/524865-eu-astrazeneca-row-covid-vaccine/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| EU asks court to impose huge fine on AstraZeneca over alleged failure to deliver Covid-19 vaccines | EU asks court to impose huge fine on AstraZeneca over alleged failure to deliver Covid-19 vaccines |
| (4 months later) | |
| A lawyer for the EU has asked a court to impose major fines on AstraZeneca over its failure to deliver Covid-19 vaccines. The company maintains that its contract with the bloc did not envision a strict number of doses, however. | A lawyer for the EU has asked a court to impose major fines on AstraZeneca over its failure to deliver Covid-19 vaccines. The company maintains that its contract with the bloc did not envision a strict number of doses, however. |
| The first hearing of the European Union’s case against the British-Swedish drugs manufacturer was held in a Brussels court on Wednesday. The bloc has been engaged in a bitter row with the company over insufficient vaccine supply for months, with the dispute escalating into a legal battle. | The first hearing of the European Union’s case against the British-Swedish drugs manufacturer was held in a Brussels court on Wednesday. The bloc has been engaged in a bitter row with the company over insufficient vaccine supply for months, with the dispute escalating into a legal battle. |
| The two parties have presented the court with divergent views of the situation. The EU’s legal representative, Rafael Jafferali, said the company had expected to deliver the contracted doses by the end of December, but “with a six-month delay, it’s obviously a failure.” | The two parties have presented the court with divergent views of the situation. The EU’s legal representative, Rafael Jafferali, said the company had expected to deliver the contracted doses by the end of December, but “with a six-month delay, it’s obviously a failure.” |
| “AstraZeneca did not even try to respect the contract,” the lawyer stated. | “AstraZeneca did not even try to respect the contract,” the lawyer stated. |
| Jafferali urged the court to fine the company at least €10 million ($12.2 million) per infraction, and to force it to pay €10 ($12.2) for each day of delay per dose. The penalty will apply from July 1, if the court agrees. Depending on AstraZeneca’s ability to deliver the outstanding doses, the total amount of penalties and fines could potentially hit nine-digit figures under such a ruling. | Jafferali urged the court to fine the company at least €10 million ($12.2 million) per infraction, and to force it to pay €10 ($12.2) for each day of delay per dose. The penalty will apply from July 1, if the court agrees. Depending on AstraZeneca’s ability to deliver the outstanding doses, the total amount of penalties and fines could potentially hit nine-digit figures under such a ruling. |
| The attorney representing AstraZeneca, Hakim Boularbah, described the EU’s allegations as “shocking,” and reiterated the company’s position that it had complied with the contract in full. He blamed the delay in deliveries on technical issues. | The attorney representing AstraZeneca, Hakim Boularbah, described the EU’s allegations as “shocking,” and reiterated the company’s position that it had complied with the contract in full. He blamed the delay in deliveries on technical issues. |
| The lawyer stressed that the company had not had any hard obligations that it had then allegedly breached, as its contract with the bloc had been established on a “best reasonable efforts” clause. | The lawyer stressed that the company had not had any hard obligations that it had then allegedly breached, as its contract with the bloc had been established on a “best reasonable efforts” clause. |
| The EU’s main argument in the case is that the drugs manufacturer used its production sites in member states and the UK to supply other customers in violation of the “best reasonable effort” clause. | The EU’s main argument in the case is that the drugs manufacturer used its production sites in member states and the UK to supply other customers in violation of the “best reasonable effort” clause. |
| “This is utterly serious. AstraZeneca did not use all the means at its disposal. There is a double standard in the way it treats the UK and member states,” Charles-Edouard Lambert, another attorney on the EU team, stated. | “This is utterly serious. AstraZeneca did not use all the means at its disposal. There is a double standard in the way it treats the UK and member states,” Charles-Edouard Lambert, another attorney on the EU team, stated. |
| AstraZeneca’s lawyer said the British sites were mentioned in the contract only for informational purposes, however, and no commitment to use them in supplying the bloc had been made. | AstraZeneca’s lawyer said the British sites were mentioned in the contract only for informational purposes, however, and no commitment to use them in supplying the bloc had been made. |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |