This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8004222.stm

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
G20 death was not heart attack G20 death was not heart attack
(10 minutes later)
A new post mortem says Ian Tomlinson died from an abdominal haemorrhage not a heart attack after contact with police during the G20 protests. A police officer has been interviewed under caution for manslaughter after a new post-mortem overturned the cause of Ian Tomlinson's death.
The statement from the City of London Coroners Court overturns the initial assessment that the newspaper seller died of natural causes. The newspaper-seller was struck and pushed over by a police officer during G20 protests on 1 April in the City.
Mr Tomlinson was hit and pushed over by a police officer on 1 April. Now a fresh examination has found he died of abdominal haemorrhage, not a heart attack, as originally thought.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) is investigating Mr Tomlinson's death. Lawyers for the family said the new post-mortem raised the likelihood of a manslaughter charge.
The Coroner's statement said the second post-mortem's conclusions were provisional. In its statement, the Coroner's Court said the inquest had looked at the first post-mortem carried out after Mr Tomlinson collapsed and died on the evening of 1 April.
In its statement, the Coroner's Court said that the inquest had looked at the first post-mortem carried out after Mr Tomlinson collapsed and died on the evening of 1 April. That examination, carried out by Dr Freddy Patel, concluded Mr Tomlinson had diseased heart and liver and a substantial amount of blood in the abdominal cavity.
That examination, carried out by Dr Freddy Patel, concluded that Mr Tomlinson had diseased heart and liver and a substantial amount of blood in the abdominal cavity.
"His provisional interpretation of his findings was that the cause of death was coronary artery disease," said the statement."His provisional interpretation of his findings was that the cause of death was coronary artery disease," said the statement.
"A subsequent post-mortem examination was conducted by another consultant forensic pathologist, Dr Nat Cary, instructed by the IPCC and by solicitors acting for the family of the late Mr Tomlinson."A subsequent post-mortem examination was conducted by another consultant forensic pathologist, Dr Nat Cary, instructed by the IPCC and by solicitors acting for the family of the late Mr Tomlinson.
"Dr Cary's opinion is that the cause of death was abdominal haemorrhage. The cause of the haemorrhage remains to be ascertained."Dr Cary's opinion is that the cause of death was abdominal haemorrhage. The cause of the haemorrhage remains to be ascertained.
"Dr Cary accepts that there is evidence of coronary atherosclerosis but states that in his opinion its nature and extent is unlikely to have contributed to the cause of death.""Dr Cary accepts that there is evidence of coronary atherosclerosis but states that in his opinion its nature and extent is unlikely to have contributed to the cause of death."
The statement concluded that both the opinions remained provisional and subject to further investigations and tests.The statement concluded that both the opinions remained provisional and subject to further investigations and tests.
In a response, the Independent Police Complaints Commission said: "Following the initial results of the second post mortem, a Metropolitan police officer has been interviewed under caution for the offence of manslaughter as part of an ongoing nquiry into the death of Ian Tomlinson."
The IPCC launched a full-scale investigation of the death after video footage revealed the officer's contact with Mr Tomlinson, despite earlier reports to the contrary. The officer involved has been suspended from duty.
Jules Carey of Tuckers, the family's solicitor, said: "The video footage of the unprovoked and vicious assault on Ian by the police officer would easily justify charges of assault being brought against the officer.
"The findings of Dr Nat Cary significantly increase the likelihood that the officer will now face the more serious charge of manslaughter".